Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 99–108 | Cite as

Ethical, Legal and Economic Aspects of Employer Monitoring of Employee Electronic Mail

  • Thomas J. Hodson
  • Fred Englander
  • Valerie Englander
Article

Abstract

This paper examines ethical, legal and economic dimensions of the decision facing employers regarding whether it is appropriate to monitor the electronic mail (e-mail) communications of its employees. We review the question of whether such monitoring is lawful. Recent e-mail monitoring cases are viewed as a progression from cases involving more established technologies (i.e., phone calls, internal memoranda, faxes and voice mail).

The central focus of the paper is on the extent to which employer monitoring of employee e-mail presents a structure of costs and benefits to the employer which are unlikely to make such a practice profitable or practical to the employer. The practice of employer monitoring to detect illicit employee behavior (e.g., fraud, harassment of fellow employees, industrial espionage) is considered.

It is argued that not only does such monitoring behavior fall short of the standard imposed by Kant's categorical imperative for ethical behavior, monitoring also fails to meet Aristotle's ethical standard of practical wisdom. Other ethical aspects of employer monitoring are considered.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aiello, J. R.: 1993, ‘Computer-based Monitoring: Electronic Surveillance and Its Effects’ Journal of Applied Social Psychology 23, 499–507.Google Scholar
  2. Bourke v. Nissan Motor Corporation In U.S.A., BO 68705 (Cal. Ct. App.) 1993.Google Scholar
  3. Chalykoff, J. and T. A. Kochan: 1989, ‘Computer-Aided Monitoring: Its Influence on Employee Satisfaction and Turnover’ Personnel Psychology 40, 807–834.Google Scholar
  4. Dworkin, R.: 1977, Taking Rights Seriously (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  5. Etzioni, A.: 1997, ‘Some Privacy, Please, for E-Mail’ New York Times (November 23), BU12.Google Scholar
  6. Finnis, J.: 1980, Natural Law and Natural Rights (Oxford University Press, New York City).Google Scholar
  7. Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510–2521, 2701–2710, 3117, 3121–3126 (1994).Google Scholar
  8. Franklin v. Gwinnett County Public Schools, 911 F.2d 617 (11th Cir.1990).Google Scholar
  9. Greenberg, J. and R. A. Baron: Behavior in Organizations: Understanding and Managing the Human Side of Work (Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ), pp. 493–495.Google Scholar
  10. Harmon, A.: 1997, ‘On the Office PC, Bosses Opt for All Work, and No Play’ New York Times (September 22), A1, D11.Google Scholar
  11. Irving, R. H., C. A. Higgins and F. R. Safayeni: 1986, ‘Computerized Performance Monitoring Systems: Use and Abuse’ Communications of the ACM 29, 794–801.Google Scholar
  12. Marpet, M.: 1997, personal communication.Google Scholar
  13. Perkins, R. M.: 1969, Perkins on Criminal Law, 2d ed., (The Foundation Press, Mineola, NY).Google Scholar
  14. Rawls, J.: 1971, A Theory of Justice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  15. Shoars v. Epson America, Inc., No. BO73243 (Cal. Cp. App.), review denied, No. SO40065, 1994 Cal. LEXIS 3670 (Cal. June 29, 1994).Google Scholar
  16. Smythe v. Pillsbury, 64 U.S.L.W., 2564 (1996).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas J. Hodson
    • 1
  • Fred Englander
    • 2
  • Valerie Englander
    • 3
  1. 1.U.S. Army Corps of EngineersUSA
  2. 2.Economics DepartmentFairleigh Dickinson UniversityMadison
  3. 3.Economics DepartmentSt. John's UniversityStaten Island

Personalised recommendations