Advertisement

The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 161–164 | Cite as

Is ‘diaphragmatic’ attenuation a misnomer?

  • Shia H. Elson
  • W. Scott Clark
  • Byron R. Williams
Article

Abstract

The most common artifact on thallium scans in our laboratory has been posterior myocardial attenuation, mostly in males. In the past this has been thought due to the position of the diaphragm. Methods: To evaluate this concept, matching chest x-rays were examined and measured. Eleven examples of posterior myocardial attenuation were consecutively pulled from our files and compared to eleven consecutive controls. Results: It was found that the diaphragm did not differ significantly. The ratio of the PA diameter of the chest to chest width was significantly (p < 0.03) less than controls. Conclusions: It is suggested that a male with a flat, wide chest is more prone to posterior myocardial attenuation. If a posterior defect is present in this type of patient it is suggested he be further evaluated to rule out artifact.

diaphragmatic attenuation posterior myocardial attenuation thallium scan 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Tamaki N, Yonekura Y, Mukai T et al. Stress Thallium-201 transaxial emission computed tomography: quantitative versus qualitative analysis for evaluation of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984: 1213-21.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Segall G, Davis M. Prone versus supine thallium myocardial SPECT: a method to decrease artifactual inferior wall defects. J Nucl Med 1989; 30: 548-55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Garcia E, Van Train K, Maddahi J et al. Quantification of rotational thallium-201 myocardial tomography. J Nucl Med 1985; 26: 17-26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kirsch CM, Doliwa R, Buell U, Roedler D. Detection of severe coronary heart disease with TI-201: comparison of resting single photon emission tomography with invasive arteriography. J Nucl Med 1983; 24: 761-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Johnstone D, Wackers F, Berger H et al. Effect of patient positioning on left lateral thallium-201 myocardial images. J Nucl Med 1979; 20: 183-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Esquerré JP, Coca F, Martinez S, Guiraud R. Prone decubitus: a solution to inferior wall attenuation in thallium-201 myocardial tomography. J Nucl Med 1989; 30: 398-401.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wackers F, Sokole E, Samson G, van der Schoot J. Atlas of 201TI myocardial scintigraphy. Clin Nucl Med 1977; 2: 64-74.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gordon D, Pfisterer M, Williams R, Walaski S, Ashburn W. The effect of diaphragmatic attenuation on 201TI images. Clin Nucl Med 1979; 4: 150-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kiat H, Van Train K, Friedman J et al. Quantitative stress-redistribution thallium-201 SPECT using prone imaging: methodologic development and validation. J Nucl Med 1992; 33: 1509-15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Friedman J, Van Train K, Maddahi J et al. ‘Upward Creep’ of the heart: a frequent source of false-positive reversible defects during thallium-201 stress-redistribution SPECT. J Nucl Med 1989; 30: 1718-22.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shia H. Elson
    • 1
  • W. Scott Clark
    • 1
  • Byron R. Williams
    • 1
  1. 1.Emory University School of MedicineAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations