## Abstract

In order to accommodate empirically observed violations of the independence axiom of expected utility theory Becker and Sarin (1987) proposed their model of lottery dependent utility in which the utility of an outcome may depend on the lottery being evaluated. Although this dependence is intuitively very appealing and provides a simple functional form of the resulting decision criterion, lottery dependent utility has been nearly completely neglected in the recent literature on decision making under risk. The goal of this paper is to revive the lottery dependent utility model. Therefore, we derive first a sound axiomatic foundation of lottery dependent utility. Secondly, we develop a discontinuous variant of the model which can accommodate boundary effects and may lead to a lexicographic non-expected utility model. Both analyses are accompanied by considering some functional specifications which are in accordance with recent experimental results and may have significant applications in business and management science.

## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

### REFERENCES

- Battalio, R.C., Kagel, J.H. and Jiranyakul, K. (1990), Testing between alternative models of choice under risk: Some initial results,
*Journal of Risk and Uncertainty*3: 25-50.Google Scholar - Becker, J.L. and Sarin, R.K. (1987), Lottery dependent utility,
*Management Science*33: 1367-1382.Google Scholar - Camerer, C.F. (1992), Recent tests of generalized utility theories, in W. Edwards (ed.),
*Utility: Measurement, Theories, and Applications*, pp. 207-251. Dordrecht.Google Scholar - Camerer, C.F. and Ho, H.T. (1994), Violations of the betweenness axiom and nonlinearity in probability,
*Journal of Risk and Uncertainty*8: 167-196.Google Scholar - Chew, S.H. (1989), Axiomatic utility theories with the betweenness property,
*Annals of Operations Research*19: 273-298.Google Scholar - Chew, S.H. and Epstein, L.G. (1989), A unifying approach to axiomatic nonexpected utility theories,
*Journal of Economic Theory*49: 207-240.Google Scholar - Chew, S.H., Epstein, L.G. and Segal, U. (1991), Mixture symmetry and quadratic utility,
*Econometrica*59: 139-163.Google Scholar - Chipman, J.S. (1971), Non-Archimedean behavior under risk: An elementary analysis with application to the theory of assets, in J.S. Chipman, L. Hurwicz, M.K. Richter and H.F. Sonnenschein (eds.),
*Preferences, Utility, and Demand: A Minnesota Symposium*, pp. 289-318. New York.Google Scholar - Cohen, M. (1992), Security level, potential level, expected utility: A three-criteria decision model under risk,
*Theory and Decision*33: 101-134.Google Scholar - Cohen, M. and Jaffray, J.Y. (1988), Preponderence of the certainty effect over probabillity distortion in decision making under risk, in B.R. Munier (ed.),
*Risk, Decision, and Rationality*, pp. 173-187. Dordrecht.Google Scholar - Conlisk, J. (1989), Three variants on the Allais Example,
*American Economic Review*79: 392-407.Google Scholar - Debreu, G. (1964), Continuity properties of Paretian Utility,
*International Economic Review*5: 285-293.Google Scholar - Dekel, E. (1986), An axiomatic characterization of preferences under uncertainty: Weakening the independence axiom,
*Journal of Economic Theory*40: 304-318.Google Scholar - Diecidue, E., Schmidt, U. and Wakker, P.P. (1999), A theory of the gambling effect. Unpublished manuscript, Tilburg University.Google Scholar
- Encarnación, J. (1964), Constraints and the firmt's utility function,
*Review of Economic Studies*31: 113-120.Google Scholar - Essid, S. (1997), Choice under risk with certainty and potential effects: A general axiomatic model,
*Mathematical Social Sciences*34: 223-247.Google Scholar - Ferguson, C. (1965), The theory of multidimensional utility analysis in relation to multiple-goal business behavior: A synthesis,
*Southern Economic Journal 32*: 169-175.Google Scholar - Fishburn, P.C. (1971), A study of lexicographic expected utility,
*Management Science*17: 672-678.Google Scholar - Gigliotti, G. and Sopher, B. (1993), A test of generalized expected utility theory,
*Theory and Decision*35: 75-106.Google Scholar - Gilboa, I. (1988), A combination of expected utility and maxmin decision criteria,
*Journal of Mathematical Psychology*32: 405-420.Google Scholar - Grandmont, J.M. (1972), Continuity properties of von Neumann-Morgenstern utility,
*Journal of Economic Theory*4: 45-57.Google Scholar - Green, J.R. and Jullien, B. (1988), Ordinal independence in nonlinear utility theory,
*Journal of Risk and Uncertainty*1: 355-387.Google Scholar - Gul, F. (1991), A theory of disappointment aversion,
*Econometrica*59: 667-686.Google Scholar - Hadar, J. and Russell, W.R. (1969), Rules for ordering uncertain prospects,
*American Economic Review*59: 25-34.Google Scholar - Harless, D.W. (1992), Predictions about indifference curves inside the unit triangle: A test of variants of expected utility theory,
*Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization*18: 391-414.Google Scholar - Harless, D.W. and Camerer, C.F. (1994), The predictive utility of generalized expected utility theories,
*Econometrica*62: 1251-1289.Google Scholar - Hey, J.D. and Orme, C. (1994), Investigating generalizations of expected utility theory using experimental data,
*Econometrica*62: 1291-1326.Google Scholar - Jaffray, J.Y. (1988), Choice under risk and the security factor: An axiomatic model,
*Theory and Decision*24: 169-200.Google Scholar - Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979), Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk,
*Econometrica*47: 263-291.Google Scholar - Karni, E. and Schmeidler, D. (1991), Utility theory with uncertainty in: W. Hildenbrand and H. Sonnenschein (eds.),
*Handbook of Mathematical Economics*, Vol. IV, pp. 1763-1831. Amsterdam.Google Scholar - Machina, J.M. (1982), Expected utility analysis without the independence axiom,
*Econometrica*50: 277-323.Google Scholar - Neilson, W.S. (1992a), Some mixed results on boundary effects,
*Economics Letters*39: 275-278.Google Scholar - Neilson, W.S. (1992b), A mixed fan hypothesis and its implications for behavior toward risk,
*Journal of Economic Behavior nd Organization*19: 197-211.Google Scholar - Newman, P. and Read, R. (1961), representation problems for preference orderings,
*Journal of Economic Behavior*1: 149-169.Google Scholar - Quiggin, J.P. and Wakker, P. (1994), The axiomatic basis of anticipated utility: A clarification,
*Journal of Economic Theory*64: 486-499.Google Scholar - Puppe, C. (1991),
*Distorted Probabilities and Choice under Risk*. Berlin.Google Scholar - Schmidt, U. (1998), A measurement of the certainty effect,
*Journal of Mathematical Psychology*42: 32-47.Google Scholar - Schmidt, U. (1999), An axiomatization of risk-value models. Unpublished manuscript, University of Kiel.Google Scholar
- Schmidt, U. (2000), Alternatives to expected utility: some formal theories, in: P.J. Hammond, S. Baberá and C. Seidl (eds.),
*Handbook of Utility Theory*, Vol. II. Boston.Google Scholar - Segal, U. (1989), Anticipated utility: A measure representation approach,
*Annals of Operations Research*19: 359-373.Google Scholar - Segal, U. (1993), The measure representation: A correction,
*Journal of Risk and Uncertainty*6: 99-107.Google Scholar - Sugden, R. (2000), Alternatives to expected utility: Foundations and concepts, in: P.J. Hammond, S. Baberá and C. Seidl (eds.),
*Handbook of Utility Theory*, Vol. II. Boston.Google Scholar - Viscusi, W.K. (1989), Prospective reference theory: Toward an explanation of the paradoxes,
*Journal of Risk and Uncertainty*2: 235-264.Google Scholar