Theory and Decision

, Volume 46, Issue 3, pp 213–252 | Cite as

Money Does Not Induce Risk Neutral Behavior, but Binary Lotteries Do even Worse

  • Reinhard Selten
  • Abdolkarim Sadrieh
  • Klaus Abbink
Article

Abstract

If payoffs are tickets for binary lotteries, which involve only two money prizes, then rationality requires expected value maximization in tickets. This payoff scheme was increasingly used to induce risk neutrality in experiments. The experiment presented here involved lottery choice and evaluation tasks. One subject group was paid in binary lottery tickets, another directly in money. Significantly greater deviations from risk neutral behavior are observed with binary lottery payoffs. This discrepancy increases when subjects have easy access to the alternatives' expected values and mean absolute deviations. Behavioral regularities are observed at least as often as with direct money payoffs.

Binary lottery payoffs Choices under risk Risk preferences Design of experiments Experimental economics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Abbink, K. and Sadrieh, A. (1995), RatImage – Research Assistance Toolbox for Computer-Aided Human Behavior Experiments, SFB Discussion Paper B-325, University of Bonn.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, G.M., DeGroot, M.H. and Marschak, J. (1964), Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method, Behavioral Science, 9: 226–232.Google Scholar
  3. Berg, cJ.E., Daley, L.E, Dickhaut, J.W. and O'Brien, J.R. (1986), Controlling preferences for lotteries on units of experimental exchange, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101: 281–306.Google Scholar
  4. Camerer, C. (1995), Choice under risk and uncertainty, in J.H. Kagel and A.E. Roth (eds.), Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 617–673.Google Scholar
  5. Cooper, R., DeJong, D.V., Forsythe, R. and Ross, T.W. (1990), Selection criteria in coordination games: some experimental results, American Economic Review80: 218–233.Google Scholar
  6. Cooper, R., DeJong, D.V., Forsythe, R. and Ross, T.W. (1993), Forward induction in the battle-of-sexes games, American Economic Review83: 1303–1316.Google Scholar
  7. Cox, J.C. and Oaxaca, R.L. (1995) Inducing risk-neutral preferences: further analysis of the data, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty11: 65–79.Google Scholar
  8. Cox, J.C., Smith, V.L. and Walker, J.M. (1985), Experimental development of sealed-bid auction theory; calibrating controls for risk aversion, American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings75: 160–165.Google Scholar
  9. Cox, J.C., Smith, V.L. and Walker, J.M. (1988), Theory and individual behavior of first-price auction, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty1: 61–99.Google Scholar
  10. Hoggatt, A.C., Selten, R., Crockett, D., Gill, S. and Moore, J. (1978), Bargaining experimentswith incomplete information, in H. Sauermann (ed.), Contributions to Experimental Economics, Vol. 7, J.C.B. Mohr, Tübingen, 127–178.Google Scholar
  11. Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (eds.) (1982), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics And Biases. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Lichtenstein, S. and Slovic, P. (1971), Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions, Journal of Experimental Psychology89: 46–55.Google Scholar
  13. Millner, E.L. and Pratt, M.E. (1992), A test of risk inducement: is the inducement of risk-neutrality neutral?Working Paper, Virginia Commonwealth University.Google Scholar
  14. Prasnikar, V. (1993), Binary lottery payoffs: do they control risk aversion? Discussion Paper No. 1059 – Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Sciences, Northwestern University, Evaston, Illinois.Google Scholar
  15. Rietz, T.A. (1993), Implementing and testing risk preference induction mechanisms in experimental sealed bid auctions, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty7: 199–213.Google Scholar
  16. Roth, A.E. and Malouf, M.W.K. (1979), Game-theoretic models and the role of information in bargaining, Psychological Review86: 574–594.Google Scholar
  17. Smith, A.B.C. (1961), Consistency in statistical inference and decision, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society23: 1–25.Google Scholar
  18. von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. (1944), Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Walker, J.M., Smith, V.L. and Cox, J.C. (1990), Inducing risk neutral preferences: An examination in a controlled market environment, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty3: 5–24.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Reinhard Selten
    • 1
  • Abdolkarim Sadrieh
    • 1
  • Klaus Abbink
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratorium für experimentelle WirtschaftsforschungBonn

Personalised recommendations