EDTA and Pb—EDTA accumulation in Brassica juncea grown in Pb—amended soil
- 591 Downloads
Previous studies have shown that EDTA is necessary to solubilize soil Pb and facilitate its transport from the soil to the above ground plant tissues. These studies have also suggested that Pb is accumulated in the plant tissue with transpiration as the driving force. We conducted further studies to evaluate the relationship between EDTA soil treatment, plant transpiration, and plant accumulation of Pb and EDTA.
Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) plants were grown in soils containing Pb at three different concentrations (1.5, 3.0 and 4.8 mmol/kg) for 5 weeks before being treated with EDTA concentrations ranging from 0 to 10 mmol/kg. Plant shoots and xylem sap were collected and analyzed for Pb and EDTA content using ICP and HPLC, respectively. Water loss was measured for 7 days following EDTA application. Transpiration was not affected at <5 mmol/kg EDTA but, at 10 mmol/kg EDTA transpiration decreased by 80%, whereas accumulation of Pb and EDTA increased. In the Sassafras soil, Pb and EDTA accumulation in the plant shoots continued to increase as the applied EDTA concentration increased, except at the highest level (10 mmol/kg). In soil amended with 4.8 mmol/kg Pb and 10 mmol/kg EDTA, the concentrations of EDTA and Pb in shoots decreased and visible signs of phytotoxicity were observed. The results presented herein support recent studies in hydroponic systems showing that EDTA and Pb are taken up by the plant and suggest that Pb is translocated in the plant as the Pb-EDTA complex. The results also show that the maximum Pb accumulation by plants occurs by maximizing the concentration of the Pb-EDTA complex based on the EDTA extractable soil Pb.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Barber S A and Elgawhary SM 1974 Plant nutrient absorption from three sources in the soil. 10th Trans. Int. Congr. Soil Sci. 4, 217–223.Google Scholar
- Chaney R L, Bell P F and Coulombe B A 1989 Screening strategies for improved nutrient uptake and utilization by plants. HortScience 24, 565–572.Google Scholar
- Hodgson J F 1968 Theoretical approach for the contribution of chelates to the movement of iron to roots. 9th Trans. Int. Congr. Soil Sci. Adelaide, Australia; Vol. 1, pp 229–241.Google Scholar
- Huang J W, Chen J and Cunningham S D 1997 Phytoextraction of lead from contaminated soils. In Phytoremediation of Soil and Water Contaminants, Vol. 664, pp 283–298. Eds. E I Kruger, T A Anderson and J R Coats, American Chemical Society.Google Scholar
- Jones J B and Case V W 1990 Sampling, handling and analyzing plant tissue samples. In Soil Testing and Plant Analysis, 3rd Edn, pp 389–427. SSSA Book Series No. 3. Ed. R L Westerman, Soil Science Society of America Inc., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
- Lindsay W L 1979 Chemical Equilibria in Soils. Wiley. New York, 449 pp.Google Scholar
- Marschner H, Romheld V and Kissel M 1986 Different strategies in higher plants on mobilizing and uptake of iron. J Plant Nutr. 9, 695–713.Google Scholar
- McBride M B 1994 In Environmental Chemistry of Soils. Oxford University Press, New York, N Y, 406 pp.Google Scholar
- Norvell W A 1991 Reactions of metal chelates in soils and nutrient solutions. In Micronutrients in Agriculture, 2nd Edn. pp 187–227. SSSA Book Series No. 4. Ed. J J Mortvedt. Soil Science Society of America Inc., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
- Patel P M, Wallace A and Romney E M 1977 Effect of chelating agents on phytotoxicity of lead and lead transport. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 8, 733–740.Google Scholar
- US Department of Energy 1994 'Phytoremediation Research Needs,' U S Department of Energy.Google Scholar
- US EPA 1986 Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/ Chemical Methods, SW-846, 3rd Edn. U S Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Wallace A and Wallace G 1992 Some of the problems concerning iron nutrition of plants after four decades of synthetic chelating agents. J. Plant Nutr. 15, 1487–1508.Google Scholar