Skip to main content
Log in

Some characteristics of a pike Esox lucius L. population in an Irish reservoir

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A study of a stocked upland reservoir trout fishery, using gill nets, revealed the presence of a large stock of pike and poor trout numbers. The overall growth rate of pike was slow. Two year-classes of pike dominated, but the broad age and length frequency ranges, and the high average weight of individuals were indicative of an unexploited stock. Higher than normal water levels during the spawning period and into the summer period in both 1985 and 1986, coincided with the dominant pike year-classes recorded several years later.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bagenal, T. B. & F. W. Tesch, 1978. Age and Growth. In T. Bagenal (ed.), Methods for Assessment of Fish Production in Fresh Waters. Blackwell Scientific Publications Ltd., Oxford: 101–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bracken, J. & W. S. T. Champ, 1971. Age and growth of pike in five Irish limestone lakes. Proc. R. Ir. Acad. 3: 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Y. & P. Radomski, 1993. Water level regulations and fisheries in Rainy Lake and the Namakan Reservoir. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 50: 1934–1945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzmaurice, P., 1983. Some aspects of the biology and management of pike (Esox lucius L.) stocks in Irish fisheries. J. Life Sci. R. Dub. Soc. 4: 161–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, W. E. & C. Kipling, 1967. A study of reproduction, early life, weight-length relationship and growth of pike, Esox lucius L. in Windermere. J. anim. Ecol. 36: 651–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamley, J. M., 1975. Review of gill-net selectivity. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 32: 1943–1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, A., 1956. Pike (Esox lucius L.) in three Irish lakes. Proc. R. Ir. Acad. 27: 51–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly-Quinn, M., D. Tierney, W. Roche & J. J. Bracken, 1996. Distribution and abundance of trout populations in moorland and afforested upland nursery streams in CountyWicklow. Proc. Roy. Ir. Acad. 96B, 3: 127–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M. & P. Fitzmaurice, 1971. Factors affecting the growth of coarse fish. In J.W. Jones & P. H. Tombleson (eds), Proc. Fourth British Coarse Fish Conference: 42–49.

  • Kipling, C. & W. E. Frost, 1970. A study of the mortality, population numbers, year class strengths, production and food consumption of pike Esox lucius L., in Windermere from 1944 to 1962. J. anim. Ecol. 39: 115–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kipling, C. & W. E. Frost, 1972. Certain effects of an annual removal of pike (Esox lucius) from Windermere. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 18: 1122–1127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagler, K. F., 1978. Capture, sampling and examination of fishes. In T. Bagenal (ed.), Methods for Assessment of Fish Production in Fresh Waters. Blackwell Scientific Publications Ltd., Oxford: 7–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Cren, E. D., 1987. Perch (Perca fluviatilis) and Pike (Esox lucius) in Windermere from 1945 to 1985; Studies in Population Dynamics. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 44: 216–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, R. H. K., 1976. Observations on the age, growth, reproduction and food of the pike Esox lucius (L.) in two rivers in southern England. J. Fish. Biol. 8: 179–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moriarty, C., 1963. Food of perch (Perca fluviatilis L.) and trout (Salmo trutta L.) in an Irish Reservoir. Proc. R. Ir. Acad. 63: 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Grady, M. F., 1981. Some direct gill net selectivity tests for brown trout populations. Ir. Fish. Invest. Series A, 22: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Grady, M. F., P. Gargan, C. Byrne, F. Igoe, & J. O'Neill, 1996. A fish stock survey report for Loughs Corrib, Mask and Carra and future management options for this fishery resource. Unpublished report. Central Fisheries Board, Dublin. 98 pp.

  • Otto, C., 1979. The effects on a pike (Esox lucius L.) population of intensive fishing in a South Swedish lake. J. Fish. Biol. 15: 461–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, R. B., C. M. Tomcko & T. D. Kolander, 1994. Indirect and direct estimates of gill-net size selectivity for northern pike. N. Amer. J. Fish. Manag. 14: 170–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raat, A. J. P., 1988. Synopsis of the biological data on the northern pike, Esox lucius Linnaeus, 1758. FAO Fish. Synop., 30 Rev. 2. 178 pp.

  • Rosell, R. S., 1994. Changes in fish populations in Lower Lough Erne: a comparison of 1972–3 and 1991–2 gill net survey data. Biology and Environment: Proc. Roy. Ir. Acad. 94B, 275–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vostradovsky, J., 1990. Fish production and fisheries management in Eastern European reservoirs. In W. L. T. van Densen, B. Steinmetz & R. H. Hughes (Eds), Management of Freshwater Fisheries. E.I.F.A.C. Goteburg. Pudoc. Waginen. 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. J. Bracken.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roche, W., O′Grady, M. & Bracken, J.J. Some characteristics of a pike Esox lucius L. population in an Irish reservoir. Hydrobiologia 392, 217–223 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003645515987

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003645515987

Navigation