Advertisement

Journal of Applied Electrochemistry

, Volume 28, Issue 10, pp 1141–1145 | Cite as

Bubble coverage and bubble resistance using cells with horizontal electrode

  • K. Qian
  • Z. D. Chen
  • J. J. J. Chen
Article

Abstract

The resistivity ratio due to gas bubbles underneath horizontal anodes in electrolytic cells was measured and compared with that in an air–water model of identical geometry. It was found that at equal current density or equivalent gas generation rate, the difference in the bubble resistivity ratio between these two situations can be up to 20%. Consequently, the results obtained from an air–water model cannot be directly applied to an electrolytic cell. Results also showed that within the range of experimental conditions covered, the bubble resistivity ratios obtained for a given anode–cathode distance in both cells are linearly related to the bubble coverage ratio, based on bubbles greater than a certain size as limited by the measurement method.

bubble coverage bubble resistivity electrolytic cells horizontal electrode 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    W. E. Haupin, in ‘Production of Aluminium and Alumina’, 2nd edn (edited by A. R. Burkin), John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1987), pp. 150–58.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    G. J. Houston, M. P. Taylor, D. J. Williams and K. Grjotheim, Predicting bath properties in aluminium smelting electrolysis, in ‘Light Metals’ (Edited by L. G. Boxall), TMS 117th Annual Meeting, Phoenix, AZ (1988), pp. 641–45.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    L. J. J. Jolas and J. Bos, Cathode drop comparison on aluminium Pechiney modern cells, in ‘Light Metals’, (edited by U. Mannweiler), TMS 123 Annual Meeting, San Francisco, (1994), pp. 403–13.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    R. C. Dorward and J. R. Payne, Development of monolithic titanium diboride cathodes for retrofit Hall cell applications, in Topic Report for US Department of Energy, DE AC07-76CS40215 (1983).Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    A. Solheim and J. Thonstad, Model cell studies of gas induced resistance in Hall-Héroult cells, in ‘Light Metals’ (edited by R. E. Miller), TSM 115th Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA (1986), pp. 379–403.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    R. Shekhar and J. W. Evans, Modelling studies of electrolyte flow and bubble behaviour in advanced Hall cells, in ‘Light Metals’ (edited by C. M. Bickert), TMS 119th Annual Meeting, Anaheim, CA (1990), pp. 243–8.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    D. Kasherman and M. Skyllas-Kazacos, J. Appl. Electrochem 18 (1988), pp. 863–8.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    R. Dorin and E. J. Frazer, ibid. 23 (1993), pp. 933–42.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    J. Xue and H. A. Øye, Bubble behaviour-Cell voltage oscillation during aluminium electrolysis and the effects of sound and ultrasound in ‘Light Metals’ (edited by J. W. Evans), TMS 124th Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, (1995), pp. 265–71.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    K. Qian, J. J. J. Chen and N. Matheou, J. Appl. Electrochem. 22 (1997), pp. 434–40.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    D. A. G. Bruggeman, Ann. Phys. 24 (1935), 636–64.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    F. Hine and K. Murakami, J. Electrochem. Soc. 127(2) (1980), 292–7.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    H. Vogt, Electrochim. Acta, 26 (1981) 1311–17.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    P. J. Sides and C. W. Tobias J. Electrochem. Soc. 129(12) (1982) 2715–20.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    R. C. Dorward, J. Appl. Electrochem. 13 (1983) 569–75.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Qian
    • 1
  • Z. D. Chen
    • 1
  • J. J. J. Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemical & Materials EngineeringThe University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations