Abstract
Gaining insights into students' attitudes and beliefs is a crucial step in understanding how the learning environment for mathematics is affected by the introduction of computers and other technology. We review research into the impact of technology on the teaching and learning of mathematics, although systematic evaluations are sparse. We discuss the relationship between affective variables and performance and having constructed appropriate measures of attitude, we present results from an extensive initial study. The study disentangles affects relating to mathematics and to computing and in doing so identifies attributes which are important where mathematics and computing interact. We report on the application of six Galbraith–Haines scales to 156 students, we discuss the implications of confidence, motivation, engagement and interaction with the technology in the learning environment and we demonstrate that the computing and mathematics attitude scales capture distinctive properties of student behaviour in this respect.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Anderson, J. R.: 1983, The architecture of cognition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Anderson, J. R.: 1995, Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications, (4th. ed.), New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Chi, M. T. H., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P. and Glaser, R.: 1989, ‘Self explanations: how students study and use examples in learning to solve problems’, Cognitive Science 13, 145-182.
Fennema, E. and Peterson, P. L.: 1985, ‘Autonomous learning behaviour: Apossible explanation of gender-related differences in mathematics’, in L. C. Wilkinson and C. B. Marrett (eds.), Gender-Related Differences in Classroom Interactions, pp. 17-35, New York: Academic Press.
Fennema, E. and Sherman, J.: 1976, ‘Sex-related differences in mathematics achievement and related factors: A further study’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 9, 189-203.
Fey, J. T.: 1989, ‘Technology and Mathematics Education: A survey of recent developments and important problems’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 20, 237-272.
Galbraith, P. L. and Haines, C. R.: 1996, ‘Student perceptions of computing, mathematics, and their interaction’, in: C. Keitel, U. Gellert, E. Jablonka and M. Mü ller (eds.), Mathematics (Education) and Common Sense, Proceedings of CIEAEM47 Berlin 23-29 July 1995, pp. 290-296.
Hart, L. E.: 1989, ‘Describing the Affective Domain: Saying what we mean’, in D. B. McLeod and V. M. Adams (eds.), Affect and Mathematical Problem Solving: A New Perspective, pp. 37-48, New York: Springer-Verlag.
Kaput, J. J. and Thompson, P. W.: 1992, ‘Technology and Mathematics Education’, in D. A. Grouws (ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, pp. 515-556, New York: Macmillan.
Kaput, J. J.: 1994, ‘Technology in Mathematics Education Research: The first 25 years in the JRME’, Journal of Research into Mathematics Education 25(6), 676-684.
LeFavre, J. and Dixon, P.: 1986, ‘Do written instructions need examples?’ Cognition and Instruction 3, 1-30.
Lester, F. K., Garofalo, J. and Kroll, D. L.: 1989, ‘Self confidence, interest, beliefs, and metacognition: key influences on problem-solving behaviour’, in D. B. McLeod and V. M. Adams (eds.), Affect and Mathematical Problem Solving: A New Perspective, pp. 75-88, New York: SpringerVerlag.
Linacre, J. M.: 1990, ‘Modelling rating scales’. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA., USA, 16-20 April, 1990, [ED 318 803]
Mackie, D. M.: 1992, An evaluation of computer-assisted learning in mathematics, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 23(5), 731-737.
Mandler, G.: 1989, ‘Affect and learning: causes and consequences of emotional interactions’, in D. B. McLeod and V. M. Adams (eds.), Affect and Mathematical Problem Solving: A New Perspective, pp. 3-19, New York: SpringerVerlag.
Marshall, S. P.: 1989, ‘Affect in schema knowledge: source and impact’, in D. B. McLeod and V. M. Adams (eds.), Affect and Mathematical Problem Solving: A New Perspective, pp. 49-58, New York: Springer-Verlag.
Meyer, M. R.: 1985, ‘The prediction of mathematics achievement and participation for females and males: a longitudinal study of affective variables’, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
McLeod, D. B.: 1985, ‘Affective issues in research on teaching mathematical problem solving’, in E. A. Silver (eds.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem-solving:Multiple research perspectives, pp. 267-279, Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
McLeod, D. B.: 1989a, ‘Beliefs, attitudes and emotions: new views of affect in mathematics education’, in D. B. McLeod and V. M. Adams (eds.), Affect and Mathematical Problem Solving: A New Perspective, pp. 245-258, New York: SpringerVerlag.
McLeod, D. B.: 1989b, ‘The role of affect in mathematical problem solving’, in D. B. McLeod and V. M. Adams (eds.), Affect and Mathematical Problem Solving: A New Perspective, pp. 20-36, New York: Springer-Verlag.
Pemberton, M. R.: 1995, Introduction to Maple. Department of Mathematics, University of Queensland.
Pemberton, M. R.: 1996, ‘The Impact of Maple on Science and Engineering Students’. Proceedings of the Second Biennial Australian Engineering Mathematics Conference, 511-519.
Reder, L. M. and Anderson, J. R.: 1980, ‘A comparison of texts and their summaries: Memorial consequences’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 19, 121- 134.
Reder, L. M., Charney, D. H. and Morgan, K. I.: 1986, ‘The role of elaborations in learning a skill from an instructional text’, Memory and Cognition 14, 64-78.
Reif, F.: 1987, ‘Interpretation of scientific or mathematical concepts: Cognitive issues and instrumental implications’, Cognitive Science 11, 395-416.
Schoenfeld, A. H.: 1989, ‘Explorations of students' mathematical beliefs and behaviour’, Journal of Educational Psychology 71(2), 242-249.
Swing, J. and Peterson, P.: 1988, ‘Elaborative and Integrative Thought Processes in Mathematics Learning’, Journal of Educational Psychology 80(1), 54-66.
Tall, D. and Razali, M. R.: 1993, ‘Diagnosing students' difficulties in learning mathematics’, International Journal for Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 24(2), 209-222.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Galbraith, P., Haines, C. Disentangling the Nexus: Attitudes to Mathematics and Technology in a Computer Learning Environment. Educational Studies in Mathematics 36, 275–290 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003198120666
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003198120666