Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On the history of studies on cladoceran taxonomy and morphology, with emphasis on early work and causes of insufficient knowledge of the diversity of the group

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The long history of cladoceran morphological andtaxonomic studies beginning in the second halfof the 17th century to nowadays is divided into sevensubsequent periods. Each of them is characterized bydomination of specific trends and a noticeableincrease of the number of taxa described. In spite ofthe multitude of studies the taxonomic diversity ofcladocerans, especially at species level, remain to beinsufficiently known. The history of hydrobiology isbriefly reviewed in order to reveal the causes ofthis insufficient knowledge among which historicalfactors and a long domination of an integral approachto studies of continental water bodies are thought tobe most important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alonso, M., 1996. Crustacea Branchiopoda. Fauna Iberica 7, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, Madrid: 486 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, W., 1843. The natural history of the British Entomostraca. No. VI. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 11: 81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, W., 1845. Arrangement of the British Entomostraca, with a list of species, particularly noticing those which have yet been discovered within the bounds of the Club. Hist. Berwickshire Naturalist’ Club 2: 145–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, W., 1850. The natural history of the British Entomostraca. The Ray Soc., London, 364 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behning, A., 1912. Studien über die vergleichende Morphologie sowie über temporale und Lokalvariation der Phyllopodenextermitation. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. und Hydrogr., Biol. Ser 4, 1: 1–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behning, A., 1941. Kladotsera Kavkaza. Tbilisi, 384 pp. (in Russian) (Cladocera of Caucasus).

  • Benzie, J. A. H., 1988a. The systematics of Australian Daphnia (Cladocera: Daphniidae). Species descriptions and keys. Hydrobiologia 166: 95–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benzie, J. A. H., 1988b. The systematics of Australian Daphnia (Cladocera: Daphniidae). Electrophoretic analyses of the Daphnia carinatacomplex. Hydrobiologia 166: 183–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birge, E. A., 1879. Notes on Cladocera. Trans. Wisc. Acad. Sci., Arts and Lett. 4: 77–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birge, E. A., 1893. Notes on Cladocera. III. Trans.Wisc. Acad. Sci., Arts and Lett. 9: 275–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birge, E. A., 1918. The water fleas (Cladocera). In Ward, H. B. & G. C. Whipple (eds), Freshwater Biology, Wiley, New York: 676–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, R.W. & B. Slobodkin, 1987. What is cyclomorphosis? Freshwat. Biol. 18: 373–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boikova, O. S. & N. M. Korovchinsky, 1995. On the intrapopulation polymorphism in Daphnia cristataSars, 1862 (Crustacea, Daphniiformes): A new approach to the cyclomorphosis of the species. Arthropoda Selecta 4: 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brancelj, A., 1990. Alona hercegovinaen.sp. (Cladocera: Chydoridae), a blind caveinhabiting cladoceran from Hercegovina (Yugoslavia). Hydrobiologia 199: 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brancelj, A., 1992. Alona sketisp.n. (Cladocera, Chydoridae), the second cave-inhabiting cladoceran from former Yugoslavia. Hydrobiologia 248: 105–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, V., 1933. Die Cladoceren der Deutschen limnologischen Sunda-Expedition. Arch. Hydrobiol. 11: 631–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, V., 1952. Diaphanosoma hydrocephalusnov.spec. eine eigenartige Sididae aus Vorder-Indien. Zool. Anz. 149: 138–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, V., 1959. Cladoceren und Calanoide Copepoden aus New Guinea. Nova Guinea, n.s. 10: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, J. L., 1957. The systematics of North American Daphnia. Mem. Conn. Acad. Arts Sci. 13: 1–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, J. L., 1966. Cladocera. In Edmondson W. T. (ed.), Freshwater Biology, 2nd edn., Wiley, New York: 587–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burckhardt, G., 1899. Faunistische und systematische Studien über das Zooplankton der grosseren Seen der Schweiz und ihrer Grenzgebiete. Rev. suisse Zool. 7: 353–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, H. G., 1933. On the feeding mechanism of the Branchiopoda. Phil. Trans. r. Soc. London, B 222: 267–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiang, S. C. & N. S. Du, 1979. Freshwater Cladocera. Fauna Sinica, Crustacea. Peking, 297 pp. (in Chinese).

  • Claus, C., 1876. Zur Kenntnis der Organisation und des feineren Baues der Daphniden und verwandter Cladoceren. Z. wiss. Zool., 27: 362–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crittenden, R. N., 1981. Morphological characteristics and dimension of the filter structures from three species of Daphnia(Cladocera). Crustaceana 41: 233–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daday, E. von, 1898. Mikroskopische Susswasserthiere aus Ceylon. Termes. Fuzetek. 21: 1–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daday, E. von, 1905. Untersuchungen über die Susswaser-Mikrofauna Paraguays. Zoologica 44: 1–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daday, E. von, 1910. Untersuchungen über die Susswasser-Mikrofauna Deutsch-Ost-Afrikas. Zoologica 59: 1–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dana, J., 1853. Crustacea. II. Daphnioides. United States Exploring expedition during the years 1838–1842 under the command of Charles Wilkes 14: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGeer, C., 1778. Memoires pour servir à l’histoire des Insectes 7, Stockholm, 470 pp.

  • Dumont, H. J., 1983. Discovery of groundwater-inhabiting Chydoridae (Crustacea: Cladocera), with the description of two new species. Hydrobiologia 106: 97–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwigubsky, J., 1892. Primitiae Faunae Mosquensis, seu Enumeration animalium, quae fronte circa Mosquam vivunt, 2nd edn. Moscow, 135 pp.

  • Edmondson, W. T., 1990. Perspectives in plankton studies. Mem. Ist. ital. Idrobiol. 47: 331–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, S., 1900. Cladoceren aus Patagonien, gessamelt von der schwedischen Expedition nach Patagonien 1899. Zool. Jb., Syst., Geogr. Biol. Tiere 14: 62–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, S., 1908. Cladoceren und Copepoden aus antarktischen und subantarktischen Binnengewassern, gesammelt von der schwedischen antarktischen Expedition 1901–1903. Wiss. Ergeb. Schwedischen Sudpolar-Exped. 5: 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, S., 1934. Studien über die Fangapparate der Branchiopoden nebst einigen phylogenetische Bemerkungen. Zool. Bidr. Uppsala 15: 23–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, S., 1848. Über die in der Umgebung von St. Petersburg Vorkommenden Crustacea aus der Ordnung der Branchiopoden und Entomostraceen. Mem. Acad. Sci. St. Petersb. 6: 159–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, S., 1850. Erganzungen, Berichtungen und Fortsetzung zu der Abhandlung über die in der Umgebung von St. Petersburg Vorcommenden Crustaceen etc. Mem. Acad. Sci. St. Petersb. 7: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flössner, D., 1972. Kiemen-und Blattfusser. Branchiopoda. Fishlause. Branchiura. Die Tiervelt Deutschlands 60, Jena, 501 pp.

  • Forbes, S. A., 1887. The lake as microcosm. Bull. Sci. Ass. Peoria.

  • Forel, F. A., 1892–1904. Le Leman. Monographie Limnologique I–III: 540 pp., 650 pp., 306 pp.

  • Frey, D. G., 1959. The taxonomic and phylogenetic significance of the head pores of the Chydoridae (Cladocera). Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. 44: 27–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, D. G., 1973. Comparative morphology and biology of three species of Eurycercus(Chydoridae, Cladocera), with a description of Eurycercus macrocanthussp.nov. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. 58: 221–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, D. G., 1980. The non-swimming chydorid Cladocera of wet forests, with descriptions of a new genus and two new species. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. 65: 613–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, D.G., 1982a. Questions concerning cosmopolitanisminCladocera. Arch. Hydrobiol. 93: 484–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, D. G., 1982b. G. O. Sars and the Norwegian Cladocera: continuing frustration. Hydrobiologia 96: 267–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, D.G., 1987. The taxonomy and biogeography of the Cladocera. Hydrobiologia 145: 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, D. G., 1991. The species of Pleuroxusand of three related genera (Anomopoda, Chydoridae) in Southern Australia and New Zealand. Rec. Aust. Mus. 43: 291–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, D. G., 1995. Changing attitudes toward chydorid anomopods since 1769. Hydrobiologia 307: 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, G., 1963. The functional morphology and feeding mechanism of the Chydorid Cladoceran Eurycercus lamellatus(O. F. Müller). Trans. r. Soc. Edinb. 65: 335–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, G., 1968. Evolution and adaptive radiation in the Chydoridae (Crustacea: Cladocera): a study in comparative functional morphology and ecology. Phil. Trans. r. Soc. London, B, 254: 221–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, G., 1974. Evolution and adaptive radiation in the Macrothricidae (Crustacea: Cladocera): a study in comparative functional morphology and ecology. Phil. Trans. r. Soc. London, B, 269: 137–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, G., 1987a. Morphology and the classification of the so-called Cladocera. Hydrobiologia 145: 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, G., 1987b. A new classification of the branchiopod Crustacea. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 91: 357–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, G., 1991. Functional morphology and adaptive radiation of Daphniidae (Branchiopoda: Anomopoda). Phil. Trans. r. Soc. London, B, 331: 1–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, G. & J. C. Paggi, 1972. A new Cladoceran genus of the family Macrothricidae from Argentina. Crustaceana 23: 255–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gajewskaya, N. S., 1948. Trofologitcheskoye napravlenie v gidrobiologii, ego objekt, nekotorye osnovnye problemy i zadachi. Pamjati akademika A. S. Zernova, Moscow–Leningrad, 27–47. (in Russian) (Trophologic direction in hydrobiology, its main problems and tasks).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, H., 1928. Recherches sur la faune des eaux continentales de l’Algérie et de la Tunicie. Alger, 419 pp.

  • Gauthier, H., 1951. Contribution à l’étude de la faune des eaux douces au Sénégal (Entomostracés). Alger, 169 pp.

  • Geller, W. & R. Müller, 1981. The filtration apparatus of Cladocera: filter mesh sizes and their implication on food selectivity. Oecologia 49: 316–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geodakyan, V. A. & N. N. Smirnov, 1968. Polovoy dimorphism i evolutsia nizshih rakoobraznyh. Problemy evolutsii 1: 30–36. (in Russian) (Sexual dimorphism and problems of Entomostraca evolution).

    Google Scholar 

  • Geoffroy, E. L., 1764. Histoire abregée des Insectes, dans lequelle ces Animaux sont rangé suivant un ordere méthodique 2, Paris, 651 pp.

  • Ghilarov, A. M., 1981. Metodologitcheskye problemy sovremennoi ekologii. Smena vedushih koncepcyi. Priroda 9: 96–103. (in Russian) (Methodological problems of modern ecology. Change of leading conceptions).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghilarov, A. M., 1988. Sootnoshenie organicizma i redukcionizma kak osnovnyh metodologicheskyh podhodov v ekologii. J. obschey biol. 49: 202–217. (in Russian) (Correlation of organicism and reductionism as the main methodological approaches in ecology).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goedardo, J., 1662. Metamorphosis Naturalis. Metamorphosis et Historia Naturalis Insectorum. Cum commentariis D. Joannus de Mey ecclesiastis Medioburgensis ac Doct. Med. & duplici ejusdem appendice, una de hemerobiis, altera de natura comentarum, & vanis ex iis divinationibus. Medioburgi.

  • Goulden, C. E., 1968. The systematics and evolution of the Moinidae. Trans. Am. Phil. Soc., Philadelphia, N.S. 58: 1–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulden, C. E. & D. G. Frey, 1963. The occurrence and significance of lateral head pores in the genus Bosmina(Cladocera). Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. 48: 513–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurney, R., 1927. Some Australian freshwater Entomostraca reared from dried mud. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond.: 59–71.

  • Havel, J. E., 1987. Predator-induced defences: a review. In Kerfoot, W. C. & A. Sih (eds), Predation: Direct and Indirect Impacts on Aquatic Communities, Hanover, N.H.: 263–278.

  • Hebert, P. D. N., 1987. Genotypic characteristics of the Cladocera. Hydrobiologia 145: 183–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebert, P. D. N. & D. Taylor, 1997. The future of cladoceran genetics: methodologies and targets. Hydrobiologia 360: 295–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellich, B., 1877. Die Cladoceren Bohmens. Die Arbeiten der Zoologischen Abtheilung der Landesdurchforschung von Böhmens. Arch. naturw. Land. Bohmen. Prag. 3, Sect. 4: 1–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbst, H.-V., 1962. Blattfusskrebse (Phyllopoden: Echte Blattfüsser und Wasserflöhe). Stuttgart, 130 pp.

  • Herrick, C. L., 1879. Microscopic Entomostraca of Minnesota. 7th Annu. Rep. min. geol. nat. Hist. Surv.: 81–123.

  • Herrick, C. L., 1884. A final report on the Crustacea of Minnesota included in the orders Cladocera and Copepoda. 12th Annu. Rep. min. geol. nat. Hist. Surv.: 1–191.

  • Hessen, D. O., 1985. Filtering structures and particle size selection in coexisting Cladocera. Oecologia 66: 368–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, G. E., 1967. Treatise on Limnology 2, N.Y., 1115 pp.

  • Huxley, J. S. (ed.), 1940. The New Systematics. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 583 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, A. I., 1967. Faunistika i zoogeographia sushy. Razvytie biologii v SSSR, Nauka, Moscow: 165–174. (in Russian) (Terrestrial faunistics and zoogeography).

    Google Scholar 

  • Joblot, C., 1754. Observations d’Histoire naturelle, faites avec le Microscope 1, Paris.

  • Johnson, D. S., 1952. The British species of the genus Daphnia (Crustacea, Cladocera). Proc. Zool. Soc. London 122: 435–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurine, L., 1820. Histoire des Monoclesqui se trouvent aus environs de Genève. Genève et Paris, 258 pp.

  • Keilhack, L., 1909. Phyllopoda. In Brauers, A. (ed.), Die Susswasserfauna Deutschlands 10, Jena, 112 pp.

  • King, R. L., 1853. On Australian Entomostraca. Pap. Proc. r. Soc. Tasmania 2: 253–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiselev, I. A., 1969. Plankton morey i kontinentalnyh vodoyemov 1, Nauka, Leningrad: 657 pp. (in Russian) (The plankton of marine and continental waters).

    Google Scholar 

  • Klocke, E., 1894. Zur Cladocerenfauna Westfalens (Verzeichnis der Litteratur über Cladoceren von 1669–1894). Westfal. Prov.–Ver. Wiss. und Kunst 22: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korinek, V., 1971. Comparative studies of head pores in the genus BosminaBaird (Crustacea, Cladocera). Vest. cs. spolec. zool. 35: 275–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korovchinsky, N. M., 1991. Naskolko nam izvesten vidovoy sostav zooplanktona ‘horosho izutchennogo’ ozera? Bull. MOIP, ser.biol., 96: 17–29. (in Russian) (How well do we know the species composition of zooplankton of ‘well studied’ lake?).

    Google Scholar 

  • Korovchinsky, N. M., 1992. Sididae and Holopediidae. Guides to the identification of the microinvertebrates of the continental waters of the World 3, SPB Acad. Publ., The Hague, 82 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korovchinsky, N. M., 1996. How many species of Cladocera are there? Hydrobiologia 321: 191–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozhow, M. M., 1962. Biologia ozera Baikal. Nauka, Moscow, 315 pp. (in Russian) (Biology of Lake Baikal).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, D. A. & S. I. Dodson, 1981. Embriological induction and predation ecology in Daphnia pulex. Limnol. Oceanogr. 26: 219–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurz, W., 1875. Dodekas neuer Cladoceren nebst einer kurzen Übersicht der Cladocerenfauna Böhmens. Sitzunsber. math.-naturw. Akad. Wiss. 70: 7–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, K., 1900. Zhizn presnyh vod. St. Peterburg, 880 pp. (in Russian) (The life of freswaters).

  • Latreille, P. A., 1802. Histoire naturelle generale et particulaire de Crustacés et Insectes 4, Paris, 348 pp.

  • Leach, W. E., 1816. Annulosa. Supplement to the 4th edition of Encyclopedia Britannica, 406.

  • Leydig, F., 1860. Naturgeschichte der Daphniden. Tubingen, 252 pp.

  • Lilljeborg, W., 1853. Om de ihom Skane forekomande Crustaceer of ordningarne Cladocera, Ostracoda ech Copepoda. Lund, 222 pp.

  • Lilljeborg, W., 1901. Cladocera sueciae oder Beitrage sur Kenntnis der in Schweden lebenden Krebstiere von der Ordnung der Branchiopoden und der Unterordnung der Cladoceren. Nova acta Req. soc. sci. Upsal., ser. 3, 19: 1–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnaeus, K., 1744. Systema Naturae, sive Regna tria Naturae systematicae proposita per Classes, Ordines, Genera et Species, etc. Lugduni.

  • Loven, S., 1836. Evadne Nordmanniet hittils okandt Entomostracon. Kong. Vet.–Acad. Handl. for ar 1835: 1–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, L., 1870. Bidrag til cladocernes morphologie og systematic. Naturv. Tids. 3: 129–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manuilova, E. F., 1964. Vetvystousye rachki fauny SSSR. Opredeliteli po faune SSSR 88, Moscow–Leningrad, 327 pp. (in Russian) (Cladocera of the USSR).

  • Margaritora, F. G., 1985. Cladocera. Fauna d’Italia 23, Bologna: 399 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E., 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. The Belknap Press, Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, 797 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E., E. G. Linsley & R. L. Usinger, 1953. Methods and Principles of Systematic Zoology. N. Y., Toronto, London, 352 pp.

  • Milne-Edwards, A., 1840. Histoire naturelle des Crustacés, comprenant l’anatomie, la physiologie et la classification de ces animaux 3, Paris, 638 pp.

  • Mordukhai-Boltovskoi, F. D., 1968. On the taxonomy of the Polyphemidae. Crustaceana 14: 197–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mordukhai-Boltovskoi, F. D. & I. K. Rivier, 1987. Hishnye vetvystousye Podonidae, Polyphemidae, Cercopagidae i Leptodoridae fauny mira. Nauka, Leningrad, 180 pp. (in Russian) (The carnivorous Cladocera of the families Podonidae, Polyphemidae, Cercopagidae and Leptodoridae of the world fauna).

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, O. F., 1776. Zoologiae Danicae prodromus seu Animalium Daniae et Norvegiae indigenarum characteres, nomina, et synonyma imprimis popularium. Havniae, 282 pp.

  • Müller, O. F., 1785. Entomostraca seu insecta testacea quae in aquis Daniae et Norvegiae reperit. Lipsiae et Havniae, 135 pp.

  • Müller, P. E., 1867. Danmarks Cladocera. Natur. Tids. 3: 53–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negrea, S., 1983. Cladocera. Fauna Republici Socialiste Romania 4, 12. Bucuresti, 399 pp.

  • Ocioszynska-Bankierova, J., 1933a. Über den Bau der Mandibeln bei Daphnia magnaStraus. Ann. Mus. Zool. Pol. 7: 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ocioszynska-Bankierova, J., 1933b. Über den Bau der Endkrallen bei der Cladoceren-Gattung Daphniaund die damit in Verbindung stehenden systematischen Probleme. Ann. Mus. Zool. Pol. 9: 382–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivier, S. R., 1962. Los Cladoceros Argentinos. Revista Mus. La Plata, Zool. 7: 173–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parenzan, P., 1932. Cladocera, sistamatica e corologia dei Cladoceri Limnicoli italiani ed appendice sui Cladoceri in generale. Minist. agricol. forest. Lab. idrobiol. pesca. Mem. sci. 8, ser. B: 1–340.

  • Pennak, R.W., 1978. Fresh-water Invertebrates of the United States. 2nd edn., N.Y., 803 pp.

  • Plavilshikov, N. N., 1941. Ocherki po istorii zoologii. Moscow, 296 pp. (in Russian) (Essays on the history of zoology).

  • Rammner, W., 1927. Zur Lokalvariation von Scapholeberis mucronataund deren Abhangigkeit von der Gewassergrosse. Zool. Anz. 72: 218–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rammner, W., 1937. Beitrag zur Cladocerenfauna von Java. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. Hydrogr. 35: 35–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard, J., 1894. Entomostracés recueillis dans lac Toba (Sumatra). Ann. Mus. civ. Stor. Natur. 14: 565–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard, J., 895. Révision des Cladocerés. I. Ann. Sci. Nat. Zool., ser.7, 18: 279–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard, J., 1896. Révision des Cladocerés. II. Ann. Sci. Nat. Zool., ser. 8, 2: 187–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Røen, U., 1962. Studies on freshwater Entomostraca in Greenland. Medd. Gronland 170: 1–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rühe, F., 1912. Monographie des Genus Bosmina. A. Bosmina coregoni im Baltischen See Gebiet. Zoologica 63: 1–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rühe, F., 1913. Biologie und Verbreitung der Bosminen und deren Beziehungen zur Eiszeit. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. Hydrogr. 6: 77–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruth, P., 1977. The changing scene in aquatic ecology. Acad. Natur. Sci. Phil. Spec. Publ. 12: 205–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabrosky, C. W., 1950. Taxonomy and ecology. Ecology 31: 151–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sars, G. O., 1861. Om de omegnen af Christiania forekommende cladocerer. Forh. Vidensk Selsk. Krist. 1861: 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sars, G. O., 1862. Hr. studios. medic. G. O. Sars fortsatte sit foredrag over de afham i omegnen af Christiania iagttagne Crustacea cladocera. Forh. Vidensk Selsk. Krist. 1861: 250–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sars, G. O., 1865. Norges Ferskvandskrebsdyr. Forste afnir Branchiopoda. 1. Cladocera Ctenopoda (Sididae & Holopediidae). Efter det Acad. Collegium, Christiania, 79 pp.

  • Sars, G. O., 1885. On some Australian Cladocera raised from dried mud. Forh. Vidensk Selsk. Christiania: 1–46.

  • Sars, G. O., 1888. Additional notes on Australian Cladocera raised from dried mud. Forh. Vidensk Selsk. Christiania: 1–74.

  • Sars, G. O., 1890. Oversight af Norges Crustaceer med forelobige Bemaerkninger over de nye eller mindre bekjendte Arter. II. Branchiopoda-Ostracoda-Cirripedia. Forh. Vidensk Selsk. Christiania: 1–80.

  • Sars, G. O., 1901. Contributions to the knowledge of the freshwater Entomostraca of South America, as shown by artificial hatching from the dried material. Arch. math. og naturv. 23: 1–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sars, G. O., 1916. The freshwater Entomostraca of Cape Province (Union of South Africa). Part I. Cladocera. Ann. South Africa Mus. 15: 303–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sars, G. O., 1993. On the freshwater Crustaceans occurring in the vicinity of Christiania. Bergen, 197 pp.

  • Schaeffer, J. C., 1763. Die grunen Armpolypen, Die geschwangen und ungeschwanzten, zackigen Wasserflöhe und eine besondere Art kleiner Wasseraale. Zweyte Auflage, Regensburg.

  • Schoedler, J. E., 1858. Der Branchiopoden in der Umgegend von Berlin. Jahresber. Louisentst. Realschule. Berlin: 1–28.

  • Schoedler, J. E., 1877. Über die Cladoceren Australiens. Sitz. Gesell. naturf. Berlin, Jahr. 1877: 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scourfield, D. J., 1942. The ‘pulex’ forms of Daphniaand their separation into two distinct series represented by D. pulex(DeGeer) and D. obtusaKurz. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 9: 202–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smirnov, N. N., 1969. Morpho-functional grounds of mode of life of Cladocera. III. Oligomerization in Cladocera. Hydrobiologia 34: 235–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smirnov, N. N., 1971a. Chydoridae faunymira. Fauna SSSR, Racoobraznye 1, 2, Nauka, Leningrad, 531 pp. (inRussian) (Chydoridae of the world fauna).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smirnov, N. N., 1971b. Morfo-funkcionalnye osnovy obraza zhizni vetvistousyh rakoobraznyh. IV. Zakon gomologitcheskyh rjadov u Cladocera calyptomera. J. obschey biol. 32: 82–86. (in Russian) (Morpho-functional grounds of Cladoceran life. IV. The law of homological rows in Cladocera caliptomera).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smirnov, N. N., 1976. Macrothricidae i Moinidae fauny mira. Fauna SSSR, Rakoobraznye 1, 3, Nauka, Leningrad, 327 pp. (in Russian) (Macrothrycidae and Moinidae of the world fauna).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smirnov, N. N., 1992. Macrothricidae of the world. Guides to the identification of microinvertebrates of the continental waters of the World 1. SPB Acad. Publ., The Hague, 143 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smirnov, N. N., 1995. Check-list of the Australian Cladocera (Crustacea). Arthropoda Selecta 4: 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smirnov, N. N. & B. V. Timms, 1983. Revision of the Australian Cladocera (Crustacea). Rec. Austral. Mus. 1: 1–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sramek-Husek, R., M. Straskraba & J. Brtek, 1962. Lupenonozci-Branchiopoda. Fauna CSSR 16, Praha, 470 pp.

  • Starobogatov, Ya. I., 1986. Systema rakoobraznyh. Zoologitchesky J. 65: 1769–1781.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stingelin, T., 1900. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Süsswasserfauna von Celebes. Entomostraca. Rev. Suisse Zool. 8: 193–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stingelin, T., 1905. Untersuchungen über die Cladocerenfauna von Hinterindien, Sumatra und Java, nebst einem Beitrage zur Cladoceren Kenntnis der Hawaii-Inseln. Zool. Jahrb., Syst., Geogr. und Biol. der Tiere 21: 327–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storch, O., 1926. Cladocera. Wasserflöhe. Biol der Tiere Deutschlands 15: 23–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storch, O., 1929. Analyse der Fangapparate niederer Krebse auf Grund von Mikro-Zeitlupenaufnahmen. I. Mitteilung der Fangapparat von Sida crystallinaO.F.M. Biol. General. Wien 5: 1–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, E., 1820. Mémoire sur les Daphniade la classe des Crustacés. Mem. Mus. Hist. Nat. Paris 6: 149–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swammerdam, J., 1669 (1685). Histoire générale des Insectes. Ou l’on expose clairement la manière lente & presq’insensible de l’accroissement de leurs membres, & ou l’on découvre évidemment l’erreur ou l’on tombe d’ordinaire au sujet de leur prétendue transformation. Autrecht. Chez Jean Ribbius (The original version of this in Latin was published in 1669).

  • Thienemann, A., 1926. Limnologie. Eine Einfuhrung in die biologischen Probleme der Süsswasserforschung. Jedermanns-Bucherei, Abt. Biologie, Breslau: 1–108.

  • Ueno, M., 1937. Order Branchiopoda (Class Crustacea). Fauna Nipponica 9, Tokyo, 135 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ueno, M., 1938. Notes on the Cladocera of Dalai-nor and its neighbouring waters. Annot. zool. jap. 17: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ueno, M., 1939. Manchurian fresh-water Cladocera. Annot. zool. jap. 18: 219–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ueno, M., 1966. Notes on some Cladocera from Iran. Japan. J. Limnol. 26: 146–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasiljeva, G. L. & N. N. Smirnov, 1969. Chydoridy Baikala. Zool. J. 48: 184–196 (in Russian) (Chydorida of Lake Baikal).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagler, E., 1927. Crustacea: Branchiopoda, Phyllopoda-Kiemenfussler. In Kukenthal, W., Handbuch der Zoologie 3: 305–398.

  • Wagler, E., 1937. Crustacea. Die Tierwelt Mitteleuropas II, 2a: 224 pp.

  • Weismann, A., 1877. Beitrage zur naturgeschichte der Daphnoiden. Teil II, III und IV. Z. wiss. Zool. 28: 93–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weismann, A., 1880. Beitrage zur naturgeschichte der Daphnoiden. Abhandl. VI und VII. Z. wiss. Zool. 33: 55–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, P. S., 1935. Limnology. New York, London, 471 pp.

  • Werner, F., 1924. Variation analytische Untersuchungen an Chydoriden. Versuch einer quantitativen Morphologie der CladocerenSchale. Z. Morph. Okol. Tiere 2: 58–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesenberg-Lund, C., 1926. Contributions to the biology and morphology of the genus Daphnia. Kgl. Danske vid. selskab. Skr., ser. 8, 11: 91–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesenberg-Lund, C., 1939. Biologie der Süsswassertiere (Wirbellose Tiere), ubersetz von O. Storch. Wien: 1–817.

  • Winberg, G. G., 1967. Osobennosty vodnyh ekologitcheskyh system. J. obschey biol. 28: 538–545. (in Russian) (The peculiarities of aquatic ecological systems).

    Google Scholar 

  • Winberg, G. G., 1975. Gidrobiologia. Istoria biologii s nachala XX veka do nashyh dney. Nauka, Moscow: 231–248. (in Russian) (Hydrobiology–The history of biology from the beginning of the 20th century to nowadays).

    Google Scholar 

  • Winberg, G.G., 1988. Konceptualnye osnovy, perspektivnye zadachi i voprosy kadrovogo obespechenyja gidrobiologitcheskyh issledovanyi. Gidrobiol. J. 24: 3–30. (In Russian) (Conceptual grounds, perspective tasks and questions of selection of personel for hydrobiological studies).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, H. G. & M. A. Mort, 1986. Inter-specific hybrydization underlies phenotypic variability in Daphniapopulations. Oecologia 68: 507–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woltereck, R., 1920. Variation und Artbildung. Analytische und experimentelle Untersuchungen an pelagischen Daphniden und anderen Cladoceren. Erster Teil. Morphologische, entwicklungs geschichtliche und physiologische Variations-Analyse. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. Hydrogr. 9: 1–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woltereck, R., 1932. Races, Associations and Stratification of pelagic Daphnids in some lakes of Wisconsin and other regions of the United States and Canada. Trans.Wisconsin Acad. Sci., Arts and Letters 27: 487–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaddach, E. G., 1855. Holopedium gibberum, ein neues Crustaceum aus der Familie der Branchiopoden. Arch. Naturgesch. 21: 159–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaharias, O., 1891. Die Tier-und Pflanzenwelt des Süsswassers. Leipzig.

  • Zavadsky, K. M., 1968. Vid i vidoobrazovanie. Nauka, Leningrad: 400 pp. (in Russian) (Species and speciation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zernov, S. A., 1921. Opyt synhronycheskoy tablitsy po razvytiju gidrobiologii, ihtiologii i drugih blizhaishyh nauk. Russ. hydrobiol. J. 1: 1–7. (in Russian) (Synchronous table on development of hydrobiology, ichthyology and related sciences).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zernov, S. A., 1949. Obschaja gidrobiologia. Moscow-Leningrad: 587 pp. (in Russian) (General hydrobiology).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. A. N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution of Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Prospect 33, 117071, Moscow, Russia

    N. M. Korovchinsky

Authors
  1. N. M. Korovchinsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Korovchinsky, N.M. On the history of studies on cladoceran taxonomy and morphology, with emphasis on early work and causes of insufficient knowledge of the diversity of the group. Hydrobiologia 360, 1–11 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003156802800

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003156802800

Search

Navigation