Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The importance of intraspecific competition in a Littorina littorea population in the Wadden Sea

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two field experiments were carried out totest whether effects of intraspecific competition ina Littorina littorea population can be detectedin a short-term investigation. Different size classesof L. littorea showed no significant differencein preferences when offered four kinds of eitherpossible food or substrata (Fucus vesiculosus,Ulva lactuca, Carcinus maenas, brick).Large and medium winkles preferred Fucusvesiculosus, followed by Ulva lactuca. Deadshore crabs (Carcinus maenas) were the leastpreferred objects for all size classes. On the firstday of the experiment bricks were more attractive tosmall littorines than to larger ones. Considering allfour days, the same ranking occurred for all sizeclasses: Fucus vesiculosus > Ulvalactuca > brick > Carcinus maenas. The reactionofjuveniles to increased densities was examined using anin situ caging experiment on a mussel bed. Meshsize of the cages allowed adult densities to beincreased while juveniles could escape by passingthrough the meshes. However, there was no significantemigration of small winkles even from cages with 10 to20 times natural density of large individuals. Ofgreater importance was the original number of winklesat the site. The available resources on the musselbeds appear to be sufficient to maintain a highpopulation density. Intraspecific competition does notseem to play a major role in this L. littorea-population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayala, F. J., 1970. Competition, coexistance and evolution. In Hecht, M. K. & W. C. Steere (eds), Essays in Evolution and Genetics in Honor of Theodosius Dobzhansky. Amsterdam: 121–158.

  • Bakker, K., 1959. Feeding habits and zonation in some intertidal snails. Arch. Néerl. Zool. 13: 230–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, K. M. & A. R. O. Chapman, 1990. Feeding preferences of periwinkles among four species of Fucus. Mar. Biol. 106: 113–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkmann, J. J., 1956. On the distribution and ecology of Littorina obtusata(L.) and its subspecific units. Arch. Néerl. Zool. 11: 22–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, R. S. K., 1986. Daily activity rhythms in the intertidal gastropod Hydrobia ulvae(Pennant). Estuar. coast. Shelf Sci. 22: 325–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branch, G. M. & M. L. Branch, 1981. Experimental analysis of intraspecific competition in an intertidal gastropod, Littorina unifasciata. Aust. J. mar. Freshwat. Res. 32: 573–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castenholz, R. W. 1961. The effect of grazing on marine littoral diatom populations. Ecology 42: 783–794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colgan, N., 1910. Notes on the adaptability of certain littoral mollusca. Irish Nat. 19: 127–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creese, R. G. & A. J. Underwood, 1982. Analysis of inter-and intraspecific competition amongst limpets with different methods of feeding. Oecologia (Berlin) 53: 337–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dernedde, T., 1992. Untersuchungen zur Ernäahrung der Möwen im Königshafen auf Sylt. Master thesis, University of Kiel, Germany, 92 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dethlefs, B., 1995. Reproduktion der Strandschnecke Littorina littorea (L.) im Wattenmeer bei Sylt. Master thesis, University of Hamburg, Germany, 68 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörjes, J., 1980. Auswirkungen des kalten Winters 1978/79 auf das marine Makrobenthos. Natur und Museum 110: 109–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, W. J. & R. G. Creese, 1985. Competitive interactions between co-occurring herbivorous gastropods. Mar. Biol. 86: 183–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraenkel, G., 1960. Lethal high temperatures for three marine invertebrates: Limulus polyphemus, Littorina littoreaand Pagurus longicarpus. Oikos 11: 171–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frid, C. L. J. & R. James, 1988. Interactions between two species of saltmarsh gastropods, Hydrobia ulvaeand Littorina littorea. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 43: 173–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geller, J. B., 1991. Gastropod grazers and algal colonization on a rocky shore in northern California: The importance of the body size of grazers. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 150: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowanloch, J. N. & F. R. Hayes, 1926. The physical factors, behaviour and intertidal life of Littorina. Contr. Canad. Biol. Fish. 3: 134–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyomarc‘hCousin, C., 1975. Etude de la croissance d’un gastéropode prosobranche gonochorique: Littorina littoreaL. Cah. Biol. Mar. 16: 483–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, F. R., 1929. Development, growth and behaviour of Littorina. Contr. Canad. Biol. Fish. 4: 415–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertzler, I., 1995. Nahrungsökologische Bedeutung von Miesmuschelbäanken für Vögel (Laro-Limikolen) im Nordfriesischen Wattenmeer. Master thesis, University of Göttingen, Germany, 119 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, G. E., 1959. Hommage to Santa Rosalia, or why are there so many kinds of animals. Am. Nat. 93: 145–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hylleberg, J. & J. Tang Christensen, 1978. Factors affecting the intra-specific competition and size distribution of the periwinkle Littorina littorea(L.). Natura jütl. 20: 193–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibing, J. & H. Theede, 1975. Zur Gefrierresistenz litoraler Mollusken von der deutschen Nordseeküste. Kieler Meeresforschungen 31: 44–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imrie, D.W., S. J. Hawkins & C. R. McCrohan, 1989. The olfactory-gustatory basis of food preference in the herbivorous prosobranch, dLittorina littorea(Linnaeus). J. Moll. Stud. 55: 217–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janke, K., 1990. Biological interactions and their role in community structure in the rocky intertidal of Helgoland (German Bight, North Sea). Helgoländer Meeresunters. 44: 219–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubchenco, J., 1978. Plant species diversity in a marine intertidal community: importance of herbivore food preference and algal competitive abilities. Am. Nat. 112: 23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayes, P. A., 1962. Comparative investigations of the euryhaline character of Littorinaand the possible relationship to intertidal zonation. Nature 195: 1269–1270.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuaid, C. D., 1996. Biology of the gastropod family Littorinidae. II Role in the ecology of intertidal and shallow marine ecosystems. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review 34: 263–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menge, B. A., 1976. Organization of the New England rocky intertidal community: role of predation, competition, and environmental heterogeneity. Ecol. Monogr. 46: 35–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menge, B. A. & J. P. Sutherland, 1976. Species diversity gradients: synthesis of the roles of predation, competition and temporal heterogeneity. Am. Nat. 110: 351–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, H. B., 1937. The biology of Littorina littorea. Part I. Growth of the shell and tissues, spawning, length of life and mortality. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 21: 721–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, D. J. & L. C. Johnson, 1980. Physical and temporal factors influencing the freezing tolerance of the marine snail Littorina littorea(L.). Biol. Bull. 158: 220–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, T. A., S. J. Hawkins, N. L. Manley, G. A. Williams & D. C. Watson, 1990. Scraping a living: a review of littorinid grazing. Hydrobiologia 193: 117–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardo, L. P., 1984. Dichteabhängige Wanderungen in einer Population von Arenicola marina(L.) im Gezeitenbereich der Nordsee. Master thesis, University of Bochum, Germany, 57 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C. H., 1982. The importance of intra-and interspecific competition in the population biology of two infaunal suspension-feeding bivalves, Protothaca stamineaand Chione undellata. Ecol. Monogr. 52: 437–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petraitis, P. S., 1983. Grazing patterns of the periwinkle and their effect on sessile intertidal organisms. Ecology 64: 522–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reise, K., 1977. Predator exclusion experiments in an intertidal mud flat. Helgoländer wiss. Meeresunters. 30: 263–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reise, K., 1978. Experiments on epibenthic predation in theWadden Sea. Helgoländer wiss. Meeresunters. 31: 55–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reise, K., 1985. Tidal Flat Ecology. Springer, Berlin, 191 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reise, K. & C. Gätje 1994. Königshafen: The natural history of an intertidal bay in the Wadden Sea–An introduction. Helgoländer Meeresunters. 48: 141–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reise, K., E. Herre & M. Sturm, 1994. Biomass and abundance of macrofauna in intertidal sediments of Königshafen in the northern Wadden Sea. Helgoländer Meeresunters 48: 201–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer, W., 1950. Über Nahrung und Wanderung im Biotop bei der Strandschnecke Littorina littorea. Arch. Moll. 79: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, B. & K. Reise, 1981. Significant predation on micro-and macrobenthos by the crab Carcinus maenas, L. in the Wadden Sea. Kieler Meeresforsch., Sonderh. 5: 490–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherell, R. M., 1981. Intraspecific competition in the periwinkle, Littorina littorea. Biol. Bull. 161: 131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. E. & G. E. Newell, 1955. The dynamics of the zonation of the common periwinkle (Littorina littorea(L.)) on a stony beach. J. anim. Ecol. 24: 35–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiven, A. E. & E. J. Kuenzler, 1979. The response of two salt-marsh molluscs, Littorina irrorataand Geukensia demissa, to field manipulations of density and Spartinalitter. Ecol. Monogr. 49: 151–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, A. J., 1978. An experimental evaluation of competition between three species of intertidal prosobranch gastropods. Oecologia (Berlin) 33: 185–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D. C. & T. A. Norton, 1985. Dietary preferences of the common periwinkle Littorina littorea(L.). J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 88: 193–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welden, C. W. & W. L. Slauson, 1986. The intensity of competition versus its importance: an overlooked distinction and some implications. The Quarterly Review of Biology 61: 23–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werding, B., 1969. Morphologie, Entwicklung und Ökologie digener Trematoden-Larven der Strandschnecke Littorina littorea. Mar. Biol. 3: 306–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelmsen, U. & K. Reise, 1994. Grazing on green algae by the periwinkle Littorina littoreain the Wadden Sea. Helgoländer Meeresunters. 48: 233–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E. E., 1964. The growth and distribution af Littorina littorea(L.) on a rocky shore in Wales. J. anim. Ecol. 33: 413–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlenberg, E., 1937. Die Wattenmeer-Lebensgemeinschaften im Königshafen von Sylt. Helgoländer wiss. Meeresunters 1: 1–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegelmeier, E., 1964. Einwirkungen des kaltenWinters 1962/63 auf das Makrobenthos im Ostteil der Deutschen Bucht. Helgoländer wiss. Meeresunters 10: 267–282.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Zoological Institute, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University, J.S.-Bach-Str. 11–12, D-17489, Greifswald, Germany

    Christiane Fenske

Authors
  1. Christiane Fenske
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fenske, C. The importance of intraspecific competition in a Littorina littorea population in the Wadden Sea. Hydrobiologia 355, 29–39 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003079507242

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003079507242

Search

Navigation