Skip to main content
Log in

Considerations for the Use of Sentence Completion Tests

  • Published:
Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Often, sentence completion tests are administered to clients without a clear sense of the clinical questions to be investigated, and, therefore, the appropriate sentence completion instrument to be used. The multitude of forms that have evolved in the last fifty years have made it difficult for clinicians to make informed decisions about which form to use and for what purpose. This article presents ten general guidelines or considerations for the effective use of this popular but sometimes misused psychological assessment method. Practitioners are urged to consider such issues as oral versus written presentation of items, item content in terms of positive or negative stimulus pull, the structure of sentence stems, the original purpose of a given test in regard to intended population and theoretical orientation of the author, and the empirical validity of tests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ames, P.C. & Riggio, R. E. (1995). Use of the Rotter Incomplete Sentences Blank with adolescent populations: Implications for determining maladjustment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64(1), pp. 159–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.T.A. (1957). A typology of tests, projective and otherwise. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21, 207–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daston, P.G. (1968). Word associations and sentence completion techniques. In A.I. Rabin (Ed.), Projective techniques in personality assessment, 264–289. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forer, B.R. (1950). A structured sentence completion test. Journal of Projective Techniques, 14, 15–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibb, H. & Wales, R. (1990). Metaphor or simile: Psychological determinants of the differential use of each sentence form. Metaphor & Symbolic Activity, 5(4), 199–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, P.A. (1965). A review of sentence completion methods in personality assessment. Journal of Projective Techniques & Personality Assessment, 29(1), 12–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holaday, M., Smith, D.A., & Sherry, A. (2000). Sentence Completion Tests: A review of the literature and results of a survey of members of the Society of Personality Assessment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 74(3), 371–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsopple, J.Q. & Miale, F.R. (1954). Sentence completion; a projective method for the study of personality. Springfield, Ill.: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lah, M.I. (1989a). Sentence completion tests. In Newmark, S.C., (Ed.), Major Psychological Instruments, Vol. II. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lah, M.I. (1989b). New validity, normative, and scoring data for the Rotter Incomplete Sentences Blank. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53(3), 607–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, R.C. (1948). The use of the sentence completion test as a projective technique with adolescents. Unpublished; completed as part of Doctoral degree requirements, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, New York University.

  • Loevinger, J. (1998). History of the sentence completion test for ego development. In J. Loevinger (Ed.)Technical Foundations for Measuring Ego Development. London: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marziali, E., Field, N., Classen, C. & Oleniuk, J. (1993). The assessment of ego development in borderline personality disorders. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 38(1), 23–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayers, K.S. (1991). A sentence completion task for use in the assessment of psychotic patients. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 9(2), 19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meltzoff, J. (1951). The effect of mental set and item structure upon response to a projective test. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 177–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabin, A.I. (1968). Adapting and devising projective methods for special purposes. In A. I. Rabin (Ed.), Projective techniques in personality assessment. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabin, A.I. & Zltogorski, Z. (1981). Completion Methods: Word Association, Sentence, and Story Completion. In A.I. Rabin, (Ed.)Assessment with Projective Techniques, A Concise Introduction, New York: Springer, 126–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabin, A.I. & Zltogorski, Z. (1985). The sentence completion method—recent research. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(6), 641–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J.B., & Rafferty, J.E. (1950). Manual for the Rotter Incomplete Sentences Blank: College form. New York: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, J.M., & Levy, S. (1950). The sentence completion test. In L.E. Abt & L. Bellak (Eds.), Projective psychology: Clinical approaches to the total personality (pp. 357–402). New York: Knorf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, M.L. (1999). Self Psychology and Diagnostic Assessment. pp. 86–87. Weiner, I.B., ed. London: Lawerence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, M.W. (1970). Stimulus pull as a determinant of individual differences in sentence completion responses. Journal of Projective Techniques & Personality Assessment, 34(4), 332–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, F.A. (1969). An investigation of methods of presenting incomplete sentence stimuli. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 74(1), 71–74.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rogers, K.E., Bishop, J. & Lane, R.C. Considerations for the Use of Sentence Completion Tests. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy 33, 235–242 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023977704349

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023977704349

Navigation