Skip to main content
Log in

Personal Area Networks: Bluetooth or IEEE 802.11?

  • Published:
International Journal of Wireless Information Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interconnecting all our electronic devices we carry around, such as cellular phones, PDAs, and laptops, with wireless links requires a cheap, low-power radio technology that still delivers good performance. In this context, the Bluetooth wireless technology was developed to meet the requirements introduced by these personal area networks (PANs). However, today we see a widespread deployment of wireless local area network (WLAN) radios (primarily IEEE 802.11b) also in small devices, such as PDAs. This paper will compare the PAN capabilities of a Bluetooth-based system with an IEEE 802.11b-based system. In order to focus the comparison on link and networking functionality, the IEEE 802.11b radio is assumed to be operating at the same power level as the Bluetooth radio (i.e., assuming a 0 dBm radio). Results are obtained by means of simulations in which throughput and delay are measured for multihop and overlaid PANs. Estimations on power usage are also given in the simulations. The results indicate that as the number of PANs increases, the Bluetooth-based PANs basically maintain the same bandwidth per PAN, while the corresponding IEEE 802.11-based PANs suffer significantly from the increased co-channel interference. However, for cases with a few co-channel-interfering PANs (2-3 PANs hosting about 10-15 nodes), the IEEE 802.11b-based PANs offer a higher bandwidth per user than the corresponding Bluetooth PANs, which corresponds to the difference in link bandwidth between the two systems. At high interference levels, the Bluetooth PAN offers a higher capacity than the IEEE 802.11 PAN. The latter also shows unfairness among TCP connections in the PAN at high loads. The energy efficiency, defined as successfully transmitted bits per energy unit, decreases sharply for IEEE 802.11 with increased number of PANs, while Bluetooth maintains a constant level. Packet delays are also shown to be more stable for the Bluetooth PAN than for the IEEE 802.11 PAN as the number of PANs increases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Specification of the Bluetooth System-Core vol. 1 v1.1, www.bluetooth.com

  2. Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANET). URL: http://www.ietf. org/html.charters/manet-charter.html. (2001-10-11). (Work in Progress).

  3. P. Johansson, M. Kazantzidis, R. Kapoor, and M. Gerla, Bluetooth: An enabler for personal area networking, IEEE Network, Vol. 15, No. 5, September 2001.

  4. IEEE 802.15 Coexistence Task Group 2 (TG2) for Wireless Personal Area Networkse. URL: http://www.ieee802.org/15/pub/ TG2.html (2001-10-11). (Work in Progress).

  5. IEEE 802.11e, MAC Enhancements for Quality of Service, URL: http://www.ieee802.org/11/ (2001-10-11). (Work in Progress).

  6. Wireless Ethernet Compatibility Alliance, URL: http://www. weca.net/ (2001-10-11).

  7. M. Frodigh, P. Johansson, and P. Larsson, Wireless ad hoc networking -The art of networking without a network, Ericsson Review, No. 4, 2000.

  8. J. C. Haartsen, Bluetooth: A new radio interface providing ubiquitous connectivity, IEEE VTC, 2000-Spring, pp. 107–111.

  9. A. Capone, R. Kapoor, and M. Gerla, Efficient polling schemes for Bluetooth picocells, ICC, 2001.

  10. S. Zürbes, W. Stahl, K. Matheus, and J. Haartsen, Radio network performance of Bluetooth, Proceedings of International Conference of Communications, New Orleans, June 2000.

  11. T. Salonidis, P. Bhagwat, L. Tassiulas, and R. LaMaire, Distributed topology construction of Bluetooth personal area networks, Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2001, Anchorage, Alaska, USA, April 22–26, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Basagni, I. Chlamtac, and G. V. Záruba, Bluetrees-Scatternet formation and routing in Bluetooth-based ad hoc networks, Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2001, Anchorage, Alaska, USA, April 22–26, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Das, A. Ghose, A. Razdan, H. Saran, and R. Shorey, Enhancing performance of asynchronous data traffic over the Bluetooth wireless ad-hoc network, Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2001, Anchorage, Alaska, USA, April 22–26, 2001.

  14. G. Miklós, A. Rácz, Z. Turányi, A. Valkó, and P. Johansson, Performance aspects of Bluetooth scatternet formation, Poster session Mobihoc 2000, Boston, Massachusetts, August 11, 2000.

  15. N. Johansson, U. Körner, and L. Tassiulas, A distributed scheduling algorithm for a Bluetooth scatternet, Seventeenth International Teletraffic Congress, ITC' 17, Salvador da Bahia, Brazil, September 24–28, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Network simulator (NS-2), www-mash.cs.berkeley.edu/ns/

  17. C. Perkins and E. Royer, Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing, Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, 1999, Proceedings, WMCSA '99, Second IEEE Workshop, 1999, pp. 90–100.

  18. P. T. Brady, A model for generating on-off speech patterns in twoway conversation, Bell System Technical Journal, pp. 2445–2471, Sept. 1969.

  19. Socket Communications Bluetooth Card specifications, http://www.socketcom.com/product/bluetoothcard.htm

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johansson, P., Kapoor, R., Kazantzidis, M. et al. Personal Area Networks: Bluetooth or IEEE 802.11?. International Journal of Wireless Information Networks 9, 89–103 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015351716362

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015351716362

Navigation