Abstract
We use exact methods to derive an interface model from an underlying microscopic model, i.e., the Ising model on a square lattice. At the wetting transition in the two-dimensional Ising model, the long Peierls contour (or interface) gets depinned from the substrate. Using exact transfer-matrix methods, we find that on sufficiently large length scales (i.e., length scales sufficiently larger than the bulk correlation length) the distribution of the long contour is given by a unique probability measure corresponding to a continuous “interface model.” The interface binding “potential” is a Dirac delta function with support on the substrate and, therefore, a distribution rather than a function. More precisely, critical wetting in the two-dimensional Ising model, viewed on length scales sufficiently larger than the bulk correlation length, is described by a reflected Brownian motion with a Dirac δ perturbation on the substrate so that exactly at the wetting transition the substrate is a perfectly reflecting surface; otherwise there exists a δ perturbation. A lattice solid-on-solid model was found to give identical results (albeit with modified parameters) on length scales sufficiently larger than the lattice spacing, thus demonstrating the universality of the continuous interface model.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
J. W. Cahn, J. Chem. Phys. 66:3667 (1977).
H. Nakanishi and M. E. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49: 1565 (1982).
D. B. Abraham, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44: 1165 (1980).
R. Lipowsky, D. M. Kroll, and R. K. P. Zia, Phys. Rev. B 27: 4499 (1983).
E. Brézin, B. Halperin, and S. Leibler, J. Phys. (Paris) 44:775 (1983).
D. S. Fisher and D. A. Huse, Phys. Rev. B 32: 247 (1985).
R. Lipowsky and M. E. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57: 2411 (1986); Phys. Rev. B 36:2126 (1987).
M. E. Fisher and A. J. Jin, Phys. Rev. B 44:1430 (1991); Phys. Rev. Lett. 69:792 (1992); A. J. Jin and M. E. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B 47:7365 (1993); Phys. Rev. B 48:2642 (1993).
C. J. Boulter and J. O. Indekeu, Phys. Rev. E 56: 5734 (1997).
Further developments of this approach include the incorporation of order-parameter fluctuations close to the substrate through the introduction of a second (lower) “interfacelike” degree of freedom, y < ( x ), which is coupled to the (upper) wetting interface, y > ( x ) > y < ( x ) ⩾ 0, leading to an effective two-interface Hamiltonian, \(H\) eff[y <, y >]. See C. J. Boulter and A. O. Parry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74:3403 (1995); A. O. Parry and C. J. Boulter, Physica A 218:77 (1995); C. J. Boulter and A. O. Parry, Physica A 218:109 (1995).
C. J. Boulter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79:1897 (1997).
P. J. Upton, Phys. Rev. E 60:R3475 (1999).
D. B. Abraham and E. R. Smith, Phys. Rev. B 26:1480 (1982); J. Statist. Phys. 43:621 (1986).
See, e.g., I. Karatzas and S. E. Shreve, Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1988).
D. B. Abraham, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47:545 (1981).
M. P. A. Fisher, D. S. Fisher, and J. D. Weeks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48:368 (1982).
S. Albeverio, Ph. Blanchard, and Z. M. Ma, in International Series of Numerical Mathematics (Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 1991), Vol. 102, p. 1.
S. Albeverio, G. W. Johnson, and Z. M. Ma, Acta Appl. Math. 42:267 (1996).
B. Simon, in Proceedings Mathematical Quantum Theory II: Schrödinger Operators, J. Feldman, R. Froese, and L. M. Rosen, eds. (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1995).
T. W. Burkhardt, Phys. Rev. B 40:6987 (1989).
D. B. Abraham, N. M. Švrakić, and P. J. Upton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68:423 (1992).
M. E. Fisher, private communication (University of Maryland at College Park).
See also D. B. Abraham and J. De Coninck, J. Phys. A 16:L333 (1983).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Upton, P.J. The Exact Interface Model for Wetting in the Two-Dimensional Ising Model. International Journal of Thermophysics 23, 1–13 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013965806342
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013965806342