Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of designed ligands by a multiple screening method: Application to glycogen phosphorylase inhibitors constructed with a variety of approaches

  • Published:
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Glycogen phosphorylase (GP) is an important enzyme that regulates blood glucose level and a key therapeutic target for the treatment of type II diabetes. In this study, a number of potential GP inhibitors are designed with a variety of computational approaches. They include the applications of MCSS, LUDI and CoMFA to identify additional fragments that can be attached to existing lead molecules; the use of 2D and 3D similarity-based QSAR models (HQSAR and SMGNN) and of the LUDI program to identify novel molecules that may bind to the glucose binding site. The designed ligands are evaluated by a multiple screening method, which is a combination of commercial and in-house ligand-receptor binding affinity prediction programs used in a previous study (So and Karplus, J. Comp.-Aid. Mol. Des., 13 (1999), 243–258). Each method is used at an appropriate point in the screening, as determined by both the accuracy of the calculations and the computational cost. A comparison of the strengths and weaknesses of the ligand design approaches is made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Watson, K.A., Mitchell, E.P., Johnson, L.N., Son, J.C., Bichard, C.J., Orchard, M.G., Fleet, G.W., Oikonomakos, N.G., Leonidas, D.D. and Kontou, M., Biochemistry, 33 (1994) 5745.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Watson, K.A., Mitchell, E.P., Johnson, L.N., Cruciani, G., Son, J.C., Bichard, C.J.F., Fleet, G.W.J., Oikonomakos, N.G., Kontou, M. and Zographos, S.E., Acta Cryst., D51 (1995) 458.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kuntz, I.D., Science, 257 (1992) 1078.

    Google Scholar 

  4. van Gunsteren, W.F., King, P.M. and Mark, A.E., Q. Rev. of Biophy., 27 (1994) 435.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Good, A.C. and Mason, J.S., In Lipkowitz, K.B. and Boyd, D.B. (eds), Reviews in Computational Chemistry, 1996, VCH Publishers, New York, NY, p. 67.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grigorov, M., Weber, J., Tronchet, J.M., Jefford, C.W., Mihous, W.K. and Maric, D., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 37 (1997) 124.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kaminski, J.J., Rane, D.F., Snow, M.E., Weber, L., Rothofsky, M.L., Anderson, S.D. and Lin, S.L., J. Med. Chem., 40 (1997) 4103.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dammkoehler, R.A., Karasek, S.F., Shands, E.F.B. and Marshall, G.R., J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des., 3 (1989) 3.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Langlois, M., Bremont, B., Rousselle, D. and Gaudy, F., Eur. J. Pharmacol., 244 (1993) 77.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shoichet, B.K., Stroud, R.M., Santi, D.V., Kuntz, I.D. and Perry, K.M., Science, 259 (1993) 1445.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gschwend, D.A., Sirawaraporn, W., Santi, D.V. and Kuntz, I.D., Prot. Struct. Funct. Genet., 29 (1997) 59.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Böhm, H.-J., J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des., 6 (1992) 593.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Böhm, H.-J., J. Comput. Aid Mol. Des., 8 (1994) 243.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Miranker, A. and Karplus, M., Prot. Struct. Funct. Genet., 11 (1991) 29.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Caflisch, A., Miranker, A. and Karplus, M., J. Med. Chem., 36 (1993) 2142.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Joseph-McCarthy, D., Hogle, J.M. and Karplus, M., Prot. Struct. Funct. Genet., 29 (1997) 32.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Eisen, M.B., Wiley, D.C., Karplus, M. and Hubbard, R.E., Prot. Struct. Funct. Genet., 19 (1994) 199.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Miranker, A. and Karplus, M., Prot. Struct. Funct. Genet., 23 (1995) 472.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rotstein, S.H. and Murcko, M.A., J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des., 7 (1993) 23.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gillet, V., Johnson, A.P., Mata, P., Sike, S. and Williams, P., J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des., 7 (1993) 127.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gillet, V.J., Newell, W., Mata, P., Myatt, G., Sike, S., Zsoldos, Z. and Johnson, A.P., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 34 (1994) 207.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gerber, P.R. and Müller, K., J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des., 9 (1995) 251.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Moon, J.B. and Howe, W.J., Prot. Struct. Funct. Genet., 11 (1991) 314.

    Google Scholar 

  24. DeWitte, R.S. and Shakhnovich, E.I., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 118 (1996) 11733.

    Google Scholar 

  25. DeWitte, R.S., Ishchenko, A.V. and Shakhnovich, E.I., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 119 (1997) 4608.

    Google Scholar 

  26. MCSS Version 2.1, Evensen, E.R., Joseph-McCarthy, D. and Karplus, M. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.

  27. Cramer, R.D., III, Patterson, D.E. and Bunce, J.D., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 110 (1988) 5959.

    Google Scholar 

  28. OLIGO Version 0.1, developed by Evenson, E.R. and Karplus M. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.

  29. Muegge, I. and Martin, Y.C., J. Med. Chem., 42 (1999) 791.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Åqvist, J., Medina, C. and Samuelsson, J.E., Prot. Eng., 7 (1994) 385.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Charifson, P.S., Corkery, J.J., Murcko, M.A. and Walters, W.P., J. Med. Chem., 42 (1999) 5100.

    Google Scholar 

  32. So, S.-S. and Karplus, M., J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des., 13 (1999) 243.

    Google Scholar 

  33. HQSAR Version 1.0 Tripos, Inc., St. Louis, MO.

  34. So, S.-S. and Karplus, M., J. Med. Chem., 40 (1997) 4347.

    Google Scholar 

  35. So, S.-S. and Karplus, M., J. Med. Chem., 40 (1997) 4360.

    Google Scholar 

  36. So, S.-S. and Karplus, M., J. Med. Chem., 39 (1996) 1521.

    Google Scholar 

  37. So, S.-S. and Karplus, M., J. Med. Chem., 39 (1996) 5246.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hahn, M., J. Med. Chem., 38 (1995) 2080.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hahn, M. and Rogers, D., J. Med. Chem., 38 (1995) 2091.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Andrea, T.A. and Kalayeh, H., J. Med. Chem., 34 (1991) 2824.

    Google Scholar 

  41. So, S.-S. and Richards, W.G., J. Med. Chem., 35 (1992) 3201.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Neria, E., Fischer, S. and Karplus, M., J. Chem. Phys., 105 (1996) 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Caflisch, A. and Karplus, M., Perspect. Drug Discov. Des., 3 (1995) 51.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Böhm, H.-J., J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des., 6 (1992) 61.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Böhm, H.-J., J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des., 8 (1994) 623.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Fisanick, W., Lipkus, A.H. and Rusinko, A.I., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 1994 (1994) 130.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Sadowski, J. and Gasteiger, J., Chem. Rev., 7 (1993) 2567.

    Google Scholar 

  48. INSIGHT Version 95.0 Molecular Simulations Inc., San Diego, CA.

  49. Cerius2 Version 3.0 Molecular Simulations Inc, San Diego, CA.

  50. Schaefer, M. and Karplus, M., J. Phys. Chem., 100 (1996) 1578.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Elber, R. and Karplus, M., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 112 (1990) 9161.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Caflisch, A., J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des., 10 (1996) 372.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Majeux, N., Scarsi, M., Apostolakis, J., Ehrhardt, C. and Caflisch, A., Prot. Struct. Funct. Genet., 37 (1999) 88.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Caflisch, A. and Karplus, M., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 91 (1994) 1746.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Grootenhuis, P.D.J. and Karplus, M., J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des., 10 (1996) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Leclerc, F. and Karplus, M., Theor. Chem. Acc., 101 (1999) 131.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Caflisch, A., Schramm, H.J. and Karplus, M., J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des., 14 (2000) 161.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Stultz, C.M. and Karplus, M., Prot. Struct. Funct. Genet., 40 (2000) 258.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Ajay, Walters, P. and Murcko, M.A., J. Med. Chem., 41 (1998) 3314.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Sadowski, J. and Kubinyi, H., J. Med. Chem., (1998).

  61. Brown, R.D. and Martin, Y.C., J. Med. Chem., 40 (1997) 2304.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Agrafiotis, D.K., J. Chem. Info. Comput. Sci., 37 (1997) 841.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Verlinde, C.L.M.J. and Hol, W.G.J., Structure, 2 (1994) 577.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Lipinski, C.A., Lombardo, F., Dominy, B.W. and Feeney, P.J., Adv. Drug Delivery Rev., 23 (1997) 3.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Wessel, M.D., Jurs, P.C., Tolan, J.W. and Muskal, S.M., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 38 (1998) 726.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Palm, K., Kuthman, K., Ungell, A.L., Strandlund, G., Beigi, F., Lundahl, P. and Artursson, P., J. Med. Chem., 41 (1998) 5382.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Lewis, D.F., Dickins, M., Lake, B.G., Eddershaw, P.J., Tarbit, M.H. and Goldfarb, P.S., Toxicology, 133 (1999) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  68. de Groot, M.J., Ackland, M.J., Horne, V.A., Alex, A.A. and Jones, B.C., J. Med. Chem., 42 (1999) 4062.

    Google Scholar 

  69. de Groot, M.J., Ackland, M.J., Horne, V.A., Alex, A.A. and Jones, B.C., J. Med. Chem., 42 (1999) 1515.

    Google Scholar 

  70. GastricPlus Version 1.3.3 Simulations Plus, Inc., Lancaster, CA.

  71. Richard, A.M., Mutat. Res., 400 (1998) 493.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

So, SS., Karplus, M. Evaluation of designed ligands by a multiple screening method: Application to glycogen phosphorylase inhibitors constructed with a variety of approaches. J Comput Aided Mol Des 15, 613–647 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011945119287

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011945119287

Navigation