Abstract
Cognitive psychology has identified and studied extensively a number of cognitive anomalies that may be important for the assessment of the economic status of individuals and households. In particular the use of brackets to elicit information about income and assets in surveys of households can interact with acquiescence bias and anchoring to cause bias in the estimates of the distributions of income and assets. This paper uses data from the Health and Retirement Study and the Asset and Health Dynamics Study to find that, as predicted by psychology, bracketing can produce bias in population estimates of assets.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chapman, G. B. and E. J. Johnson. (1994). ''The Limits of Anchoring,'' Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 7, 223–242.
Couch, Arthur and Kenneth Keniston. (1960). ''Yeasayers and Naysayers: Agreeing Response Set as a Personality Variable,'' Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 60(2), 151–174.
Hoynes, Hilary, Michael Hurd, and Harish Chand. (1998). ''Household Wealth of the Elderly under Alternative Imputation Procedures.'' In David Wise ed., Inquiries in the Economics of Aging, pp. 229–254. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hurd, Michael D. (1997). ''A Model of the Effects of Anchoring on Population Distributions,'' Mimeo, RAND.
Hurd, Michael D. et al. (1998). ''Consumption and Saving Balances of the Elderly: Experimental Evidence on Survey Response Bias.'' In D. Wise ed., Frontiers in the Economics of Aging, pp. 353–387. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jackson, Douglas N. and Samuel Messick. (1958). ''Content and Style in Personality Assessment,'' Psychological Bulletin 55(4), 243–252.
Jacowitz, K. E. and Kahneman, D. (1995). ''Measures of Anchoring in Estimation Tasks,'' Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21, 1161–1166.
Juster, F. Thomas and Richard Suzman. (1995). ''An Overview of the Health and Retirement Study,'' Journal of Human Resources 30, S7-S56.
Klayman, Joshua and Young-Won Ha. (1987). ''Confirmation, Disconfirmation, and Information in Hypothesis Testing,'' Psychological Review 94(2), 211–228.
Kruglanski, A. W. and T. Freund. (1983). ''The Freezing and Unfreezing of Lay-Inferences: Effects on Impressional Primacy, Ethnic Stereotyping, and Numerical Anchoring,'' Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 19, 448–468.
Locander, William B. and John P. Burton. (1976). ''The Effect of Question Form on Gathering Income Data by Telephone,'' Journal of Marketing Research, XIII, 189–192.
Poulton, E. C. (1989). Bias in Quantifying Judgements, Hove U.K. and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ray, John J. (1983). ''Reviving the Problem of Acquiescent Response Bias,'' The Journal of Social Psychology 121, 81–96.
Schuman, Howard and Stanley Presser. 1981. Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys. New York: Academic Press, Inc.
Smith, James P. (1995). ''Racial and Ethnic Differences in Wealth,'' Journal of Human Resources 30, S158-S183.
Strack, Fritz and Thomas Mussweiler. (1997). ''Explaining the Enigmatic Anchoring Effect: Mechanisms of Selective Accessibility,'' Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(3), 437–446.
Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman. (1974). ''Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases,'' Science 185, 1124–1131.
Wilson, T. D. et al. (1996). ''A New Look at Anchoring Effects: Basic Anchoring and Its Antecedents,'' Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 125, 387–402.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hurd, M.D. Anchoring and Acquiescence Bias in Measuring Assets in Household Surveys. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19, 111–136 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007819225602
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007819225602