Skip to main content
Log in

Forced Sexual Intercourse Among Intimates

  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A survey of the prevalence of forced sexual intercourse reported rates approximately equivalent to those noted in other studies that used similar methods. Twenty-two investigations that measured the incidence and prevalence of forced sexual intercourse were reviewed. A comparison was made of the definitions presented, the sampling procedures, the time span of the studies, the geographic locations represented, and the reported rates of forced sexual intercourse. The comparison indicates that much of the variation in prevalence of forced, sexual intercourse can be attributed to variations in investigational methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Amick, A., & Calhoun, K. (1987). Resistance to sexual aggression: Personality, attitudinal, and situational factors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 16, 153–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, B. L. (1988). From front porch to back seat: The history of courtship in America. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, G. E., Greenwood, L., & Sommer, R. (1991). Family Relations, 40, 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women's ways of knowing. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourque, L. B. (1989). Defining rape. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breines, W., & Gordon, L. (1983). The new scholarship on family violence. Signs, 8, 491–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, J. S., & McGrail C. A. (1989). Attributions of responsibility for date and stranger rape. Sex Roles, 21(¾), 273–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will: Men, women, and rape. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, M. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38,217–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cate, R. M., Henton, J. M., Koval, J. E., Christopher, F. S., & Lloyd, S. A. (1982). Premarital abuse: A social psychological perspective. Journal of Family Issues, 3, 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherry, F. (1983). Gender roles and sexual violence. In E. R. Allgeier & N. B. McCormick (Eds.), Changing Boundaries: Gender Roles and Sexual Behavior. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, S. M., & Lewis, D. J. (1977). Rape: The price of coercive sexuality. Toronto: Women's Educational Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degraw, D., & Ingram, J. (1990). Date rape on six college campuses and the issue of consent. Presented to the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Denver, CO March 1990.

  • DeKeseredy, W. S. (1988). Woman abuse in dating relationships: The role of male peer support. Toronto: Canadian Scholar's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilorio, J. A. (1989). Being and becoming coupled: The emergence of female subordination in heterosexual relationships. In B. J. Risman & P. Schwartz (Eds.), Gender in intimate relationships (pp. 94–102). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiVasto, P. V., Kaufman, A., Rosner, L., Jackson, R., Christy, J., Pearson, S., & Burgett, T. (1974). The relevance of sexually stressful events among females in the general population. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 13, 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, D. P., & Burfeind, J. W. (1994). The University of Montana sexual victimization survey. Missoula: University of Montana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eltzeroth, R., Charles, M. T., Kethineni, S., & Haghighi, B. (1994). The issues of rape and date rape as reported by female and male students at the University of Illinois. Champaign, IL: Police Training Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenstermaker, S. (1988). Acquaintance rape on campus: Attributions of responsibility and crime. In M. Pirog-Good & J. Stets (Eds.), Violence in dating relationships (pp. 257–271). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, H. S. (1978). Attitudes toward rape: A comparative analysis of police, rapists, crisis counselors, and citizens. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 156–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follingstad, D. R., Rutledge, L. R., Polek, D. S., & McNeill-Hawkins, K. (1988). Factors associated with patterns of dating violence toward college women. Journal of Family Violence, 3, 169–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, L. K., Winfield, I., & Blazer, D. G. (1992). Sociocultural factors in sexual assault: Comparison of two representative samples of women. Journal of Social Issues, 48(1), 105–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, S. (1971). The all-American crime. Ramparts, 10, 26–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. R., & Flannery, P. J. (1984). Prevalence and correlates of sexual assault experiences in adolescents, Victimology: An International Journal, 9, 398–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G. D., Palileo, G. J., & Gray, N. B. (1992). “Date rape” on a southern college campus: Reports from 1991. Sociology and Social Research, 76(6), 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanin, E. J. (1957). Male aggression in dating-courtship relations. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 197–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanin, E. J. (1967). Reference groups and sex conduct norm violations. Sociological Quarterly, 8, 495–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koss, M., Dinero, T., Seibel, C., & Cox, S. (1988). Stranger and acquaintance rape: Are there differences in the victims' experience. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koss, M., Gidycz, C., & Wisniewski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilpatrick, D. G., Best, C. L., Veronen, L. J., Amick, A. E., Villeponteaux, L. A., & Ruff, G. A. (1985). Mental health correlates of criminal victimization: A random community study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53(6), 866–873.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, S. A. (1991). The darkside of courtship: Violence and sexual exploitation. Family Relations, 40, 14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makepeace, J. (1981). Courtship violence among college students. Family Relations, 30, 97–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makepeace, J. (1989). Dating, living together and courtship violence. In M. Pirog-Good & J. Stets (Eds). Violence in dating relationships: Emerging issues (pp. 94–107). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. S., & Granoff, B. J. (1992). Date and acquaintance rape among a sample of college students. Social Work, 37, 504–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muehlenhard, C. L., Friedman, D. E., & Thomas, C. M. (1985). Is date rape justifiable? The effects of dating activity, who initiated, who paid, and men's attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9(3), 297–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muehlenhard, C., & Linton, M. (1987). Date rape and sexual aggression in dating situations: Incidence and risk factors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 93, 186–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murnen, S. K., Perot, A., & Byrne, D. (1989). Coping with unwanted sexual activity: Normative responses, situational determinants, and individual differences. Journal of Sex Research, 26, 85–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mynatt, C. R., & Allgeier, E. R. (1990). Risk factors, self-attributions, and adjustment problems among victims of sexual coercion. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20(2), 130–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrot, A. (1986). Acquaintance rape and sexual assault prevention training manual (2nd ed.). New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrot, A., & Bechhofer, L. (1991). Acquaintance rape. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poppen, P. J., & Segal, N. J. (1988). The influence of sex and sex role orientation on sexual coercion. Sex Roles, 19, 689–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabkin, J. G. (1979). The epidemiology of forcible rape. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 49, 634–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, V. M. (1977). Rape as a social problem: A byproduct of the feminist movement. Social Problems, 25, 247–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, E. K. (1984). Hands and hearts: A history of courtship in America. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, D. E. (1975). The politics of rape: The victim's perspective. New York: Stein and Day.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, D. E. H. (1984). Sexual exploitation: Rape, child sexual abuse, and workplace harassment.Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigler, R. T., & Wenstrom, M. (1993). Incidence of Date Rape on a College Campus. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 17, 229–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson, S. B., Stein, J. A., Siegel, J. M., & Burnam, M. A. (1987). The prevalence of sexual assault: The Los Angeles epidemiologic catchment area project. American Journal of Epidemiology, 126, 1154–1164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, P. (1976). Single. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J. E., & Pirog-Good, M. A. (1987). Violence in dating relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 237–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J. E., & Pirog-Good, M. A. (1989a). Sexual aggression and control in dating relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 1392–1412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J. E., & Pirog-Good, M. A. (1989b). The marriage license as a hitting license: A comparison of assaults in dating cohabiting, and married couples. In M. A. Pirog-Good and Stets, J. E. (Eds.), Violence in dating relationships: Emerging issues (pp. 33–52). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Story, M. D. (1982). A comparison of university students experience with various sexual outlets in 1974 & 1980. Adolescence, 17, 737–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, W. (1937). The rating and dating complex. American Sociological Review, 2, 727–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, W. (1951). The family: A dynamic interpretation. New York: Dryden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, S. K., Chapman, K., Cohn, E., White, S., & Williams, K. (1991). Acquaintance rape and the college social scene. Family Relations, 40, 65–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warshaw, R. (1988). I never called it rape. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt, E. G. (1992). The sociocultural context of African American and white American woman's rape. Journal of Social Issues, 48(1), 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yegidis, B. L. (1986). Date rape and other forced sexual encounters among college students. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 12, 51–54.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, I.M., Sigler, R.T. Forced Sexual Intercourse Among Intimates. Journal of Family Violence 15, 95–108 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007505621643

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007505621643

Navigation