Skip to main content
Log in

Moral Realism, Moral Relativism and Moral Rules (A Compatibility Argument)

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Boyd, R.: 1988, 'How to be a Moral Realist', in G. Sayer-McCord (ed.), Essays on Moral Realism, Wadsworth, Belmont CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, F. H.: 1962, Ethical Studies, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brink, D.: 1989, 'Moral Realism Defended', in L. Pojman (ed.), Ethical Theory: Classical and Contemporary Readings, Wadsworth, Belmont CA.

  • Ellis. B.: 1981, 'Retrospective and Prospective Utilitarianism', Noûs 15, 329–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N.: 1989, 'Just the Facts, Ma'am', in M. Krausz (ed.), Relativism: Interpretation and Confrontation, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN, pp. 383–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G.: 1989, 'Is There a Single True Morality', in M. Krausz (ed.), Relativism: Interpretation and Confrontation, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN, pp. 383–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G.: 1989a, 'Moral Relativism Defended', in Louis P. Pojman (ed.), Ethical Theory: Classical and Contemporary Readings, Wadsworth, Belmont, CA, pp. 33–41.

  • Jackson, F.: 1986, 'A Probabilistic Approach to Moral Responsibility', R. Barcan Marcus (ed.), Proceedings of the 7th International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, F.: 1991, 'Decision-Theoretic Consequentialism and the Nearest and Dearest Objection', Ethics 101, 461–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, J.: 1979, Value and Existence, Rowan and Littlefield, Totowa, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: 1986, Convention: A Philosophical Study, 2nd ed., Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oddie, G. and P. Menzies: 1992, 'An Objectivisis Guide to Subjective Values', Ethics 102, 327–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oddie. G. and P. Milne: 1991, 'Act and Value: Expectations and Representability of Moral Theories', Theoria 48, 165–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, N. and M. Timmons: 1985, Morality and Universality, D. Reidel Publishing, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T.: 1960, The Strategy of Conflict, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. J. C. and B. Williams: 1973, Utilitarianism: For and Against, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylvan, R.: 1988, 'Radical Pluralism — An Alternative to Realism', in R. Nola (ed.), Relativism and Realism in Science, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 253–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallentyne, P.: 1987, 'The Teleological/Deontological Distinction', The Journal of Value Inquiry 21, 21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallentyne. P.: 1987a, 'Utilitarianism and the Outcomes of Actions', Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 68, 57–70.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oddie, G. Moral Realism, Moral Relativism and Moral Rules (A Compatibility Argument). Synthese 117, 251–274 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005183121781

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005183121781

Keywords

Navigation