Wetlands Ecology and Management

, Volume 11, Issue 5, pp 273–280 | Cite as

Mechanisms behind changes in fish biodiversity in the floodplains of Bangladesh

  • Gertjan de Graaf
  • Felix Marttin
Article

Abstract

Fish species composition in two permanent floodplains (Beels) was monitored during 1992–1999. In one, small prawns (Macrobrachium spp.) replaced `beel-resident' species such as Puntius sophore, Colisa fasciatus, and Mastacembelus pancalus, while in the other beel no significant changes were observed. The reduction of the water area of the affected beel during the dry season and a resulting increase of the fishing effort was the main cause. The results are discussed in the context of overall developments in floodplain fisheries related to water and fisheries management and led to the formulation of a rapid fish biodiversity method.

Bangladesh biodiversity fishing effort floodplain fisheries species composition water management 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahmed, M. 1992. Determination of fisheries benefits from floodplain riverine systems in Bangladesh: a mathematical programming approach. Aquacult. & Fish. Manag. 23: 599–622.Google Scholar
  2. Ali, M.A. 1997. Fish, Water and People: Reflections on Inland OpenWater Fisheries Resources in Bangladesh, University Press Limited, Dhaka, 154 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. 1989. Statistical Yearbook of Bangladesh Statistic Division, Ministry of Planning, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 115 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Bayley, P.B. 1988. Factors affecting growth rates of young floodplain fishes: Seasonality and density dependence. Envir. Biol. Fish 21: 127–147.Google Scholar
  5. de Graaf, G.J. in press. Floodplain fisheries monitoring and Geographical Information Systems. Accepted NAGA.Google Scholar
  6. de Graaf, G.J., Born, A.F., Uddin, A.M.K. and Huda, S. 1994. Final report Special Fisheries Study. Floodplain fisheries monitoring and Geographical Information Systems Compartmentalisation Pilot Project, FAP 20, Technical note 94/10. Tangail, Bangladesh, 87 pp.Google Scholar
  7. de Graaf, G.J., Born, B., Uddin, A.M.K. and Huda, S. 1999. Larval fish movement in the Lohajang River, Tangail, Bangladesh. J. Fish. Manag. & Ecol. 6: 109–120.Google Scholar
  8. de Graaf, G.J., Born, A.F., Uddin, A.M.K. and Marttin, F. 2001. Floods, Fish and Fishermen. Eight Years' Experience with Floodplain Fisheries in Bangladesh. University Press Limited, Dhaka, 174 pp.Google Scholar
  9. de Graaf, G.J. and Marttin, F. 2002. Monitoring fish, GIS is helping to monitor floodplain fish biodiversity in Bangladesh. GIS-user 50: 37–39.Google Scholar
  10. Department of Fisheries (DoF). 1983–1999. Fish Catch Statistics of Bangladesh, Department of Fisheries, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 330 pp.Google Scholar
  11. ESCAP. 2000. Integrating Environmental Considerations into the Economic Decision Making Process. www.unescap.org/drpad/pub3/integra/modalities/bangladesh/4bl02b01.htm.Google Scholar
  12. FAP (Flood Action Plan) 17. 1995. Final report-Main volume. Overseas Development Administration, UK.Google Scholar
  13. Halls, A.S. 1998. An Assessment of the Impact of Hydraulic Engineering on Floodplain Fisheries and Species Assemblages in Bangladesh. PhD Thesis. University of London, 526 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Halls, A.S., Hoggarth, D.D. and Debnath, K. 1999. Impacts of hydraulic engineering on the dynamics and production potential of floodplain fish populations in Bangladesh. Fish. Manag. & Ecol.Google Scholar
  15. Hoggarth, D.D., Cowan, V.J., Halls, A.S., Aeron-Thomas, M.A., McGregor, J.A., Garaway, C.A., P ayne, A.I. and Welcomme, R.L. 1999. Management Guidelines for Asian Floodplain River Fisheries, Part 2: Summary of DFID Research, FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 384/2, Rome, Italy, 117 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Junk, W.J., B ayley, P.B. and Sparks, R.E. 1989. The flood pulse concept in River-floodplain systems. In: D.P. Dodge (ed.), Proceedings of the International Large River Symposium, Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 106: pp. 110–127.Google Scholar
  17. Khulna Jessore Drainage Rehabilitation Project. 1995. Status report on the environmental impacts of the project (component A: mobilisation of beneficiary participation). Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, Asian Development Bank, Euroconsult, 81 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Laë, R. 1997. Does overfishing lead to a decrease in catches and yields? An example of two West African coastal lagoons. Fish. Manag. & Ecol. 4: 149–164.Google Scholar
  19. Siddiqui, M.H. 1990. Flood control and drainage development: Physical environmental issues. In: A.A. Rahman, S. Huq and G.R. Conway (eds.), Environmental Aspects of Surface Water Systems of Bangladesh, pp. 104–108. University Press Ltd., Dhaka.Google Scholar
  20. Soa-Leang and Dom Saveun. 1955. Apercu general sur la migration et la reproduction des poissons d'eau douce du Cambodge. Proc IPFC 5: 138–162.Google Scholar
  21. Tsai, C.F. and Ali, L. 1985. Open Water Fisheries (carp) Management Programme in Bangladesh Fisheries Information Bulletin 2, 51 pp.Google Scholar
  22. Tsai, C.F and Ali, L. 1987. The changes in fish community and major carp population in beels in the Sylhet-Mymensingh basin, Bangladesh. Indian J. Fish 34: 78–88.Google Scholar
  23. Welcomme, R.L. 1985. River Fisheries. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 262, Rome, Italy, 320 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gertjan de Graaf
    • 1
  • Felix Marttin
    • 2
  1. 1.Nefisco foundationAmsterdamthe Netherlands
  2. 2.Inland Water Resources and Aquaculture service (FIRI)Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United NationsRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations