Water, Air and Soil Pollution: Focus

, Volume 4, Issue 2–3, pp 73–84

The Development of a GIS-based Inventory of Standing Waters in Great Britain together with a Risk-based Prioritisation Protocol

  • M. Hughes
  • D. D. Hornby
  • H. Bennion
  • M. Kernan
  • J. Hilton
  • G. Phillips
  • R. Thomas
Article

Abstract

An inventory of standing waters (freshwater lakes and lochs) wasderived from Ordnance Survey digital map data at a scale of 1:50 000 and represents the most comprehensive survey of its kind for Great Britain. The inventory includes 43 738 water bodies in England, Scotland, Wales and the Isle of Man and contains basic physical data such as location, surface area, perimeter and altitude. Catchment areas were computed for water bodies with a surface area larger than 1 ha from a digital terrain model (DTM) using customised routines in a geographical information system (GIS). The resulting polygons were then used to derive catchment-related information from a variety of national datasets including population density, livestock density, land cover, solid and drift geology, meteorological data, freshwater sensitivity status, acid deposition and conservation status. Using data derived from the inventory a risk-based prioritisation protocol was developed to identify standing waters at risk of harm from acidification and eutrophication. This information is required by the Environment Agency, Scottish Environmental Protection Agency and the U.K. statutory conservation bodies to co-ordinate actions and monitor change under international, European and national legislation.

acidification catchment delineation eutrophication GIS Great Britain risk-assessment standing waters 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barr, C. J., Howard, D. C. and Benefield, C. B.: 1994, Countryside Survey 1990. Inland Water Bodies, Department of the Environment, London (Countryside 1990 Series).Google Scholar
  2. Bennion, H., Hilton, J., Hughes, M., Clark, J., Hornby, D., Kernan, M. and Simpson, G.: 2002, ‘Development of a risk based prioritisation protocol for standing waters in Great Britain based on a georeferenced inventory - Phase 2’, Environment Agency R&D, Technical Report P2-260/2/TR1.Google Scholar
  3. Bennion, H., Juggins, S. and Anderson, N. J.: 1996, ‘Predicting epilimnetic phosphorous concentrations using an improved diatom-based transfer function and its application to lake eutrophication management’, Environ. Sci. Technol. 30, 2004-2007.Google Scholar
  4. Bracken, I. and Martin, D.: 1995, ‘Linkage of the 1981 and 1991 U.K. Censuses using surface modelling concepts’, Environ. Plann. A 27, 379-390.Google Scholar
  5. Curtis, C. J., Allott, T. E. H., Hughes, M., Hall, J., Harriman, R., Helliwell, R., Kernan, M., Reynolds, B. and Ullyett, J.: 2000, ‘Critical loads of sulphur and nitrogen for fresh waters in Great Britain and assessment of deposition reduction requirements with the First-order Acidity Balance (FAB) model’, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 4, 125-140.Google Scholar
  6. DEFRA (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs): 2001, First Consultation Paper on the Implementation of the EC Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC), DEFRA.Google Scholar
  7. DETR (Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions): 2000, Guidelines for Environmental Risk Assessment and Management, Revised Departmental Guidance.Google Scholar
  8. European Union: 2000, Directive of the European Parliament and the Council 2000/60/EC Establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Water Policy, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  9. Ferrier, R. C., Owen, R., Edwards, A. C., Malcolm, A. and Morrice, J. G.: 1997, ‘Hindcasting of phosphorus concentrations in Scottish Standing Waters’, in P. J. Boon and D. L. Howell (eds), Freshwater Quality: Defining the Indefinable?, HMSO, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  10. Fuller, R. M., Groom, G. B. and Jones, A. R.: 1994, ‘The land cover map of Great Britain: An automated classification of Landsat Thematic Mapper data’, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 60, 553-562.Google Scholar
  11. Haines-Young, R. H., Barr, C. J., Black, H. I. J., Briggs, D. J., Bunce, R. G. H., Clarke, R. T., Cooper, A., Dawson, F. H., Firbank, L. G., Fuller, R. M., Furse, M. T., Gillespie, M. K., Hill, R., Hornung, M., Howard, D. C., McCann, T., Morecroft, M. D., Petit, S., Sier, A. R. J., Smart, S. M., Smith, G. M., Stott, A. P., Stuart, R. C. and Watkins, J. W.: 2000, Accounting for Nature: Assessing Habitats in the U.K. Countryside, DETR, London.Google Scholar
  12. Henriksen, A., Skjelvale, B. L., Mannio, J., Wilander, A., Harriman, R., Curtis, C., Jensen, J. P., Fjeld, E. and Moiseenko, T.: 1998, ‘Northern European Lake Survey, 1995’, Ambio 27, 80-91.Google Scholar
  13. Hilton, J., Irons, G. P. and McNally, S.: 1999, ‘Pilot Catchment Study of Nutrient Sources - Control Options and Costs’, Environment Agency, Technical Report, pp. 345.Google Scholar
  14. Hornung, M., Bull, K. R., Cresser, M., Ullyett, J., Hall, J. R., Langan, S. and Loveland, P. J.: 1995, ‘The sensitivity of surface waters of Great Britain to acidification predicted from catchment characteristics’, Environ. Pollut. 87, 207-214.Google Scholar
  15. Hughes, M. and Fisher, P.: 2000, ‘Evaluating the derivation of sub-urban land-cover data from ordnance survey land-line’, in P. Atkinson and D. Martin D. (eds), GIS and Geocomputation: Innovations in GIS 7, Taylor and Francis, London.Google Scholar
  16. Jenkins, A., Whitehead, P. G., Cosby, B. J. and Birks, H. J. B.: 1990, ‘Modelling long-term acidification: A comparison with diatom reconstructions and the implications for reversibility’, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., Series B 327, 209-214.Google Scholar
  17. Johnes, P. J., Curtis, C., Moss, B. Whitehead, P., Bennion, H. and Patrick, S.: 2000, ‘Trial Classification of Lake Water Quality in England and Wales: A proposed approach’, Research and Development Technical Report E53, Environment Agency, Bristol.Google Scholar
  18. Johnes, P. J., Moss, B. and Phillips, G. L.: 1996, ‘The Determination of water quality by land use, livestock numbers and population data - Testing of a model for use in conservation and water quality management’, Freshwat. Biol. 36, 451-473.Google Scholar
  19. Jones, V. J., Flower, R. J., Appleby, P. G., Natkanski, J., Richardson, N., Rippey, B., Stevenson, A. C. and Battarbee, R. W.: 1993, ‘Palaeolimnological evidence for the acidification and atmospheric contamination of lochs in the Cairngorm and Lochnagar areas of Scotland’, J. Ecol. 81, 3-24.Google Scholar
  20. Kernan, M., Hughes, M. Hornby, D., Bennion, H., Hilton, J., Phillips, G. and Thomas, R.: 2004, ‘The use of a GIS-based inventory to provide a regional assessment of standing waters in Great Britain sensitive to acidification from atmospheric deposition’, Water, Air, Soil Pollut.: Focus 4, 97-112.Google Scholar
  21. Lloyd, C. D. and Atkinson, P. M.: 2002, ‘Deriving DSM’s from LiDAR data with kriging’, Int. J. Remote Sens. 23, 2519-2524.Google Scholar
  22. Lyle, A. A. and Smith, I. R.: 1994, ‘Standing waters’ in P. S. Maitland, P. J. Boon and D. S. McLusky (eds), The Fresh Waters of Scotland, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  23. Morris, D. G. and Flavin, R.W.: 1990, ‘A digital terrain model for hydrology’, Proc 4th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, Vol. 1, 23-27 July, Zurich, pp. 250-262.Google Scholar
  24. Murray, J. and Pullar, L.: 1910, Bathymetrical Survey of the Fresh Water Lochs of Scotland, Challenger Office, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  25. Ordnance Survey: 2001, ‘Land-Form PANORAMA User Guide v3.0’, Ordnance Survey, Southampton.Google Scholar
  26. Pollard, S., Duarte-Davidson, R., Yearsley, R., Twigger-Ross, C., Fisher, J., Willows, R. and Irwin, J.: 2000, ‘A Strategic Approach to the Consideration of Environmental Harm’, NCRAOA, Report Number 36.Google Scholar
  27. Smith, I. R. and Lyle, A. A.: 1979, Distribution of Freshwaters in Great Britain, Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Edinburgh. U.K.Google Scholar
  28. Biodiversity Group: 1998, Tranche 2 Action Plans. Vol. 2: Terrestrial and Freshwater Habitats, English Nature.Google Scholar
  29. Wise, S.: 2000, ‘Assessing the quality for hydrological applications of digital elevation models derived from contours’, Hydrol. Process 14, 1909-1929.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Hughes
    • 1
  • D. D. Hornby
    • 2
  • H. Bennion
    • 1
  • M. Kernan
    • 1
  • J. Hilton
    • 2
  • G. Phillips
    • 3
  • R. Thomas
    • 4
  1. 1.Environmental Change Research CentreUniversity College LondonLondonU.K
  2. 2.Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Winfrith Technology CentreDorchesterU.K
  3. 3.National Centre for Risk Analysis Options AppraisalEnvironment AgencyReadingU.K
  4. 4.National Centre for Environmental DataEnvironment AgencyBathU.K

Personalised recommendations