The Rise of Social Cooperatives in Italy

  • Antonio Thomas
Article

Abstract

This paper reports how a new model of social enterprise—the social cooperative (SCs)—has become instrumental, in the Italian context, in the expansion of the social economy. It underlines the contribution these associations have made toward broadening the concept and standard parameters of volunteer organizations, providing basic social welfare services, and integrating the disadvantaged into the mainstream of society. The paper focuses on some SCs organizational aspects, highlighting the many traditional and advantageous business features, the ease with which they have access to financial instruments, and their ability to activate wider social projects. Given their recent spreading in Italy, where the Third Sector is less developed than in other Western countries, SCs incorporate working modalities that could also be of interest and relevance to other countries. To adopt this type of organization, however, calls for adequate competencies and protection under specific laws because they are, on the whole, still small-sized and somewhat fragile.

social enterprise social economy nonprofit sector Italy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Ben-Ner, A., and Van Hoomissen, T. (1991). Non-profit organization in the mixed economy. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 62(4), 519-550.Google Scholar
  2. Borzaga, C. (1998). Italie: l'impressionant dèveloppement des coopèratives sociales. In Defourny, J., Favreau, L., and Laville, J. L. (eds.), Insertion et nouvelle èconomie sociale. Un bilan interna-tional, Desclèe de Brouwer.Google Scholar
  3. Borzaga, C., and Defourny, J. (2001). Le imprese sociali in Europa: quali percorsi di sviluppo? In Borzaga, C., Defourny, J. (eds.), L'impresa sociale in una prospettiva europea, Issan, Trento, Italia.Google Scholar
  4. Borzaga, C., and Santuari, A. (2001). Italia: dalle cooperative tradizionali alle cooperative sociali. In Borzaga C., and Defourny, J. (eds.), L'impresa sociale in una prospettiva europea, Issan.Google Scholar
  5. Borzaga, C., and Solari, L. L. (2001). La gestione dell'impresa sociale: problemi e prospettive. In Borzaga, C., Defourny, J. (eds.), L'impresa sociale in una prospettiva europea, Issan, Trento, Italia.Google Scholar
  6. Consorzio Gino Mattarelli (CGM). (1997). II rapporto sulla cooperazione sociale, Fondazione, Agnelli, Torino, Italy.Google Scholar
  7. Clary, E. G., Snyder, M., and Stukas, A. A. (1996). Volunteers' motivations: Findings from a national survey. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 25(4), 485-505.Google Scholar
  8. Defourny, J. (2001). Dal terzo settore all'impresa sociale. In Borzaga, C., and Defourny, J. (eds.), L'impresa sociale in una prospettiva europea, Issan.Google Scholar
  9. Hansmann, H. B. (1980). The role of non-profit enterprise. The Yale Law Journal 89(5), 835-901.Google Scholar
  10. Herzberg, F. (1968). One more time: How do you motivate employees? Harvard Business Review 1, 53-62.Google Scholar
  11. Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline of Firms, Organizations and States, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  12. Isfol (2002). Formazione e occupazione in Italia e in Europa, Angeli, Milano, Italy.Google Scholar
  13. Martinelli, L., and Lepri, S. (1997) Le Cooperative Sociali, Il Sole 24 Ore, Milano, Italy.Google Scholar
  14. Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and Personality, Harper & Row, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  15. Mattioni, F., and Tranquilli, D. (1998). Da svantaggiati ad imprenditori, Hoepli, Milano, Italy.Google Scholar
  16. McGregor, D. (1960). The Human Side of Enterprise, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  17. Mertens, S. (1999). Nonprofit organizations and social economy: Two ways of understanding the Third Sector. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 70(3), 501-520.Google Scholar
  18. Mora, E., and Ragazzi, C. (1998). Le cooperative sociali. In AA.VV., Enti non Profit, Summit, n. 127, Ipsoa.Google Scholar
  19. Ortmann, A. (1996). Modern economic theory and the study of non-profit organizations: Why the twain shall meet. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 25(4), 470-484.Google Scholar
  20. Putnam, R. D. (1993). The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. The American Prospect 4(13), 35-42.Google Scholar
  21. Rose-Ackerman, S. (1986). The Economics of Nonprofit Institutions. Structure and Policy, Oxford University Press, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  22. Rose, R. (1993). Welfare: il mix pubblico/privato. In Ascoli, V., and Pasquinelli, S. (eds.), Il Welfare mix, Angeli, Milano, Italy.Google Scholar
  23. Salamon, L. M. (1997). The United States. In Salamon, L. M., and Anheier, H. K. (eds.), Defining the Nonprofit Sector: A Cross National Analysis, Manchester University Press, Manchester.Google Scholar
  24. Sen, A. (1974). Choice, orderings and morality. In Korner, S. (ed.), Practical Reason, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  25. Spear, R. (1997). Il vantaggio cooperativo nell'epoca della globalizzazione. Rivista della Cooperazione 4, 21-25.Google Scholar
  26. Thomas, A. (1999). The System of Social Cooperative Services, National Research Council, Naples, Italy.Google Scholar
  27. Thomas, A. (2002). Gli elementi di competitività delle cooperative sociali. Economia e Diritto del Terziario 2, 653-673.Google Scholar
  28. Travaglini, C. (1997). Le cooperative sociali tra impresa e solidarietà, Clueb, Bologna, Italia.Google Scholar
  29. Weisbrod, B. A. (1975). Toward a theory of the voluntary non-profit sector in a three sector economy. In Phelps, E. (ed.), Altruism, Morality and Economic Theory, Russell Sage, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  30. Young, D. R. (1983). If Not for Profit, for What? Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society for Third-Sector Research and The Johns Hopkins University 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio Thomas
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Service Industry Research—National Research CouncilNaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations