Plant Ecology

, Volume 174, Issue 2, pp 197–203 | Cite as

Semiarid grassland responses to short-term variation in water availability

Article

Abstract

Standing crop and species composition in semiarid grassland are linked to long-term patterns of water availability, but grasslands are characterized by large single-season variability in rainfall. We tested whether a single season of altered water availability influenced the proportions of grasses and shrubs in a semiarid grassland near the northern edge of the North American Great Plains. We studied stands of the clonal shrub snowberry (Symphoricarpos occidentalis) and adjacent grassland dominated by the native grasses Stipa spartea and Bouteloua gracilis. Rain was excluded and water supplied in amounts corresponding to years of low, medium, and high rainfall, producing a 2 − 4-fold range in monthly precipitation among water supply treatments. There were ten replicate plots of each water treatment in both snowberry stands and grassland. Grass standing crop increased significantly with water availability in grassland but not inside snowberry stands. Total standing crop and shrub stem density increased significantly with water supply, averaged across both communities. In contrast, water had no effect on shrub standing crop or light penetration. In summary, our finding that water has significant effects on a subset of components of grassland vegetation is consistent with long-term, correlational studies, but we also found that a single season of altered water supply had no effect on other important aspects of the ecosystem.

Biomass Drought Light Rainfall Soil moisture Species composition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Archer S., Schimel D.S. and Holland D.S. 1995. Mechanism of shrubland expansion: land use, climate or CO2 ? Climatic Change 29: 90–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakker J.D. and Wilson S.D. 2001. Competitive abilities of introduced and native grasses. Plant Ecology 157: 119–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnes P. and Harrison A.T. 1982. Species, distribution and community organization in a Nebraska Sandhills mixed prairie as influenced by plant-soil-water relations. Oecologia 52: 192–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowers J.E. and Turner R.M. 2002. The influence of climatic variability on local population dynamics of Cercidium microphyllum (foothill paloverde). Oecologia 130: 105–113.Google Scholar
  5. Briggs J.M. and Knapp A.K. 1995. Interannual variability in primary production in tall grass prairie: climate, soil moisture, topographic position, and fire as determinants of aboveground biomass. American Journal of Botany 82: 1024–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown J.R. and Archer S. 1999. Shrub invasion of grassland: recruitment is continuous and not regulated by herbaceous biomass or density. Ecology 80: 2385–2396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carpenter A.T. and West N.E. 1987. Indifference of mountain big sagebrush growth to supplemental water and nitrogen. Journal of Range Management 40: 448–451.Google Scholar
  8. Davis M.A., Wrage K.L., and Reich P.B. 1998. Competition between tree seedlings and herbaceous vegetation: support for a theory of resource supply and demand. Journal of Ecology 86: 652–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Epstein H.E., Lauenroth W.K., Burke I.C. and Coffin D.P. 1997. Productivity patterns of C3 and C4 functional types in the U.S. Great Plains. Ecology 78: 722–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fair J., Lauenroth W.K. and Coffin D.P. 1999. Demography of Bouteloua gracilis in a mixed prairie: analysis of genets and individuals. Journal of Ecology 87: 233–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fay P.A., Carlisle J.D., Danner B.T., Lett M.S., McCarron J.K., Stewart C., Knapp A.K., Blair J.M. and Collins S.L. 2002. Altered rainfall patterns, gas exchange, and growth in grasses and forbs. International Journal of Plant Science 163: 549–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fowler N. 1986. The role of competition in plant communities in arid and semiarid regions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 17: 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Golluscio R.A., Sala O.E. and Lauenroth W.K. 1998. Differential use of large summer rainfall events by shrubs and grasses: a manipulative experiment in the Patagonian steppe. Oecologia 115: 17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harrington G.N. 1991. Effects of soil moisture on shrub seedling survival in a semi-arid grassland. Ecology 72: 1138–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hook P.B. and Lauenroth W.K. 1994. Root system response of a perennial bunchgrass to neighborhood-scale soil water heterogeneity. Functional Ecology 8: 738–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jackson R.B., Mooney H.A. and Schulze E.-D. 1997. A global budget for fine root biomass, surface area, and nutrient contents. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 94: 7362–7366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Knapp A.K., Briggs J.M. and Koelliker J.K. 2001. Frequency and extent of water limitation to primary production in a mesic temperate grassland. Ecosystems 4: 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Knapp A.K. and Smith M.D. 2001. Variation among biomes in temporal dynamics of aboveground primary productivity. Science 291: 481–484.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Köchy M. and Wilson S.D. 2000. Competitive effects of shrubs and grasses in prairie. Oikos 91: 385–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lauenroth W.K., Dodd J.L. and Sims P.L. 1978. The effects of water-and nitrogen-induced stresses on plant community structure in a semiarid grassland. Oecologia 36: 211–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lauenroth W.K. and Sala O.E. 1992. Long-term forage production of North American shortgrass steppe. Ecological Applications 2: 397–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li X. and Wilson S.D. 1998. Facilitation among woody plants establishing in an old field. Ecology 79: 2694–2705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Looman J. and Best K.K. 1987. Budd's flora of the Canadian prairie provinces. Publication 1662, Agriculture Canada, Research Branch, Hull, Canada.Google Scholar
  24. Owensby C.E., Hyde R.W. and Anderson K.L. 1970. Effects of clipping and supplemental nitrogen and water on loamy upland bluestem range. Journal of Range Management 23: 341–346.Google Scholar
  25. Peltzer D.A. and Wilson S.D. 2001. Variation in plant responses to neighbors at local and regional scales. American Naturalist 157: 610–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Polley H.W., Johnson H.B. and Mayeux H.S. 1994. Increasing CO2: comparative responses of the C4 grass Schizachyrium and grassland invader Prosopis. Ecology 75: 976–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sala O.E., Parton W.J., Joyce L.A. and Lauenroth W.K. 1988. Primary production of the central grassland region of the United States. Ecology 69: 40–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sala O.E., Golluscio R.A., Lauenroth W.K. and Soriano A. 1989. Resource partitioning between shrubs and grasses in a Patagonian steppe. Oecologia 81: 501–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Scholes R. and Archer S. 1997. Tree-grass interactions in savannas. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28: 517–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tilman D. 1990. Constraints and tradeoffs: toward a predictive theory of competition and succession. Oikos 58: 3–15.Google Scholar
  31. Vetaas O.R. 1992. Micro-site effects of trees and shrubs in dry savannas. Journal of Vegetation Science 3: 337–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of ReginaReginaCanada
  2. 2.Section for Vegetation Ecology and Nature ConservationInstitute for Biochemistry and Biology, Universität PotsdamPotsdamGermany

Personalised recommendations