Advertisement

Plant Ecology

, Volume 171, Issue 1–2, pp 209–220 | Cite as

Pines and oaks in the restoration of Mediterranean landscapes of Spain: New perspectives for an old practice — a review

  • Juli G. Pausas
  • Carme Bladé
  • Alejandro Valdecantos
  • José P. Seva
  • David Fuentes
  • José A. Alloza
  • Alberto Vilagrosa
  • Susana Bautista
  • Jordi Cortina
  • Ramon Vallejo
Article

Abstract

Pines have been extensively used for land restoration in the Mediterranean basin and in other parts of the world, since the late 19th century. The theoretical basis supporting pine utilisation was its stress-tolerant and pioneer features, and their attributed role of facilitating the development of late-successional hardwoods in the long-term. In the present work, the use of pines and hardwoods in forest restoration is discussed in the frame of the current disturbance regime and social demands for Mediterranean forests. Large pine plantations have recently disappeared because of their sensitivity to fire (e.g., Pinus nigra) or because of the short fire-intervals (e.g., Pinus halepensis). Combined pine and oak plantations are proposed for degraded land restoration on the basis of the complementary features of both groups of species. Seeding and containerised seedling plantation, soil amendments and plantation techniques to reduce transplant shock are evaluated for reforestation under water-stressing conditions, on the basis of several experiments performed in eastern Spain. Both P. halepensis and Quercus ilex are tested.

Fire Pinus halepensis Plantation Quercus ilex Reforestation Seedling survival 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acherar M., Lepart J. and Debussche M. 1984. La colonisation des friches par le pin d’Alep (Pinus halepensis Miller) en Languedoc méditerranéen. Acta Oecologica 5: 179-189.Google Scholar
  2. Alcántara J.M., Rey P.J., Valera F., Sánchez la Fuente A.M. and Gutierrez J.E. 1998. Habitat alteration and plant intra-specific competition for seed dispersers. An example with Olea europaea var. sylvestris. Oikos 79: 291-300.Google Scholar
  3. Allen E. 1995. Restoration ecology: limits and possibilities in arid and semiarid lands. In: Proceedings of the Wildland Shrub and Arid Land Restoration Symposium. USDA Forest Service INTGTR-315, pp. 7-15.Google Scholar
  4. Anonymous 1997. Report to Parliament and the Council on the application of Regulation (EEC) No 2080/92 instituting a Community aid scheme for forestry measures in agriculture (http://europa.eu.int/comm/agriculture/fore/2080_en.pdf).Google Scholar
  5. Arianoutsou M. and Ne'eman G. 2000. Post-fire regeneration of natural Pinus halepensis forests in the East Mediterranean basin. In: Ne'eman, G., Trabaud, L. (eds), Ecology, Biogeography and Management of Pinus halepensis and P. brutia Forest Ecosystems in the Mediterranean Basin. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands, pp. 269-290.Google Scholar
  6. Arianoutsou M., Kazanis D., Kokkoris Y. and Skourou P. 2002. Land-use interactions with fire in Mediterranean Pinus halepensis landscapes of Greece: patterns of biodiversity. In: Viegas, D.X. (ed). Forest Fires Research and Wildland Safety. Millpress, Rotterdam, (electronic edition).Google Scholar
  7. Badia M. and Martí C. 2000. Seeding and mulching treatments as conservation measures of two burned soils in the Central Ebro Valley, NE Spain. Arid Soil Research and Rehabilitation 13: 19-32.Google Scholar
  8. Barbéro M., Loisel R., Quézel P., Richardson D.M. and Romane F. 1998. Pines of the Mediterranean Basin. In: Richardson D.M. (ed), Ecology and Biogeography of Pinus. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, pp. 153-170.Google Scholar
  9. Bautista S., Bellot J. and Vallejo V.R. 1996. Mulching treatment for postfire soil conservation in a semiarid ecosystem. Arid Soil Research and Rehabilitation 10: 235-242.Google Scholar
  10. Bautista S. and Vallejo V. 2002. Spatial variation of post-fire plant recovery in Aleppo pine forest. In: Trabaud L. and Prodon R. (eds), Fire and biological processes. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp. 13-24.Google Scholar
  11. Bellot J., Ortiz de Urbina J.M., Bonet A. and Sánchez J.R. 2002. The effects of treeshelters on the growth of Q. coccifera L. seedlings in a semiarid environment. Forestry 75: 89-106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bergstern U. 1985. A study on the influence of seed predators at direct seeding of Pinus sylvestris L. Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet Rapporter 13: 1-15.Google Scholar
  13. Bergez J.E. and Dupraz C. 1997. Transpiration rate of Prunus avium L. seedlings inside and unventilated treeshelter. Forest Ecology and Management 97: 25-264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bertness M.D. and Callaway R.M. 1994. Positive interactions in communities. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9: 191-193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Blondel J. and Aronson J. 1999. Biology and Wildlife of the Mediterranean Region. Oxford Univ. Press. Oxford.Google Scholar
  16. Bolòs O. 1967. Comunidades vegetales de las comarcas próximas al litoral situadas entre los rios Llobregat y Segura. Memorias de la Real Academia de Ciencias y Artes de Barcelona 38: 1-269.Google Scholar
  17. Bonet A. and Pausas J.G. in press. Temporal changes in species richness and cover of semiarid Mediterranean old-fields in South-eastern Spain. Plant Ecology.Google Scholar
  18. Bossena, I. 1979. Jays and oaks: an eco-ethological study of a symbiosis. Behaviour 70: 1-117.Google Scholar
  19. Brofas O. and Varelides C. 2000. Hydro-seeding and mulching for establishing vegetation on mining spoils in Greece. Land Degradation and Development 11: 375-382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Callaghan T.V., Abdelnour H. and Lindley D.K. 1988. The environmental crisis in the Sudan. The effect of water-absorbing synthetic polymers on tree germination and early survival. Journal of Arid Environments 14: 301-318.Google Scholar
  21. Callaghan T.V., Lindley D.K., Ali O.M., El-Nour H.A. and Bacon P.J. 1989. The effect of water-absorbing synthetic polymers on the stomatal conductance growth and survival of transplanted Eucalyptus microtheca seedlings in the Sudan. Journal of Applied Ecology 26: 663-672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Callaway R.M. 1995. Positive interactions among plants. Botanical Review 61: 306-349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Castell C. and Castelló J.I. 1996. Metodología y resultados de la siembra aérea efectuada en el parque natural del Garraf. Montes 46: 51-57.Google Scholar
  24. Castro-Díez P., Puyravaud J.P., Cornelissen J.H.C. and Villar-Salvador P. 1998. Stem anatomy and relative growth rate in seedlings of a wide range of woody plant species and types. Oecologia116: 57-66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Castro J., Zamora R., Hódar J.A. and Gómez J.A. 2002. Use of shrubs as nurse plants: A new technique for reforestation in Mediterranean mountains. Restoration Ecology 10: 297-305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ceballos L. 1938. Plan general para la restauración forestal de España. ICONA. Madrid.Google Scholar
  27. Choudhary M.I., Shalaby A.A. and Al-Omran A.M. 1995. Water holding capacity and evaporation of calcareous soils as affected by four synthetic polymers. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 26 (13 and 14): 2205-2215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Cortina J., Bellot J., Vilagrosa A., Caturla R.N., Maestre F., Rubio E., Ortíz de Urbina J.M. and Bonet A. (in press). Restauración en semiárido. In: Vallejo R. (ed), Estudios Avanzados en la Gestión del Monte Mediterráneo. Fundación CEAM, València.Google Scholar
  29. Costa M. 1986. La vegetació del País Valencià. Universitat de València. València.Google Scholar
  30. Daskalakou E.N. and Thanos C.A. 1996. Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis) postfire regeneration: the role of canopy and soil seed banks. International Journal of Wildland Fire 6: 59-66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. De Simón E., Ripoll M.A., Bocio I., Navarro F.B. and Gallego E. 2001. Aprovechamiento de escorrentías superficiales mediante la formación de microcuencas en repoblaciones de zonas semiáridas. In: Montes para el nuevo milenio. III Congreso forestal español. Vol II., Junta de Andalucía, Granada, España, pp. 305-310.Google Scholar
  32. Escudero A., Sanz M.V., Pita J.M. and Pérez-García F. 1999. Probability of germination after heat treatment of native Spanish pines. Annals of Forest Science 56: 511-520.Google Scholar
  33. FAO 1988. Soil map of the world. Revised legend. Rome.Google Scholar
  34. FAO 2001. Global forest resources assessment 2000. FAO forestry paper 140. Rome.Google Scholar
  35. Gil L. and Prada M.A. 1993. Los pinos como especies básicas en la restauración forestal en el medio mediterráneo. Ecología 7: 113-125.Google Scholar
  36. Habrouk A., Retana J. and Espelta J.M. 1999. Role of heat tolerance and cone protection of seeds in the response of three pine species to wildfires. Plant Ecology 145: 91-99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hadri H. and Tschinkel H. 1975. La régénération de Pinus halepensis après coupe rase et sous peuplement. Institut National de Recherches Forestières (note de recherche). December (1-19).Google Scholar
  38. Handel S.N. 1997. The role of plant-animal mutualisms in the design and restoration of natural communities. In: Urbanska K.M., Webb N.R. and Edwards P.J. (eds), Restoration Ecology and Sustainable Development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 111-132.Google Scholar
  39. Herranz J.M., Martínez-Sánchez J.J., Marin A. and Ferrandis P. 1997. Postfire regeneration of Pinus halepensis Miller in a semiarid area in Albacete province (Southeastern Spain). Écoscience 4: 86-90.Google Scholar
  40. Hüttermann A., Zommorodi M. and Reise K. 1999. Addition of hydrogels to soil for prolonging the survival of Pinus halepensis seedlings subjected to drought. Soil and Tillage Research 50: 295-304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. ICONA 1975. Inventario Forestal Nacional. Región de Levante. Ministerio de Agricultura, Madrid.Google Scholar
  42. ICONA 1989. Técnicas de Reforestación en los Países Mediterráneos.Google Scholar
  43. Ksontini M., Louguet P., Laffray D. and Nejib Rejeb M. 1998. Comparaison des effets de la contrainte hydrique sur la croissance, la conductance stomatique et la photosynthèse de jenues plants de chênes méditerranées (Quercus suber, Q. faginea, Q. coccifera) en Tunisie. Annals of Forest Science 55: 477-495.Google Scholar
  44. Lahouati R. 2000. Expérience des Plantations en Climat Aride. Cas de la Ceinture Verte en Algérie.Direction Générale des forêts, Ministère de l’Agriculture, Alger.Google Scholar
  45. Le Maître D.C. 1998. Pines in cultivation: a global view. In: Richardson D.M. (ed), Ecology and Biogeography of Pinus. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, pp. 407-431.Google Scholar
  46. Leone V., Borghetti M. and Saracino A. 2000. Ecology of post-fire recovery in Pinus halepensis in southern Italy. In: Trabaud L. (ed), Life and environment in the Mediterranean. Wit Press, Southampton, pp. 129-154.Google Scholar
  47. Llacuna S. 1998. Incidencia dels micromamifers sobre les llavors de pi blanc (Pinus halepensis). III trobada d’estudiosos del Garraf. Diputació de Barcelona.Google Scholar
  48. Lovich J.E. and Bainbridge D. 1999. Anthropogenic degradation of the Southern California desert ecosystem and prospects for natural recovery and restoration. Environmental Management 24: 309-326.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McClanahan T. R. and Wolfe R.W. 1993. Accelerating forest succession in a fragmented landscape: the role of birds and perches. Conservation Biology 7: 279-288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Maestre F.T., Bautista S., Cortina J. and Bellot J. 2001. Potential for using facilitation by grasses to establish shrubs on a semiarid degraded steppe. Ecological Applications 11: 1641-1655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Maestre F.T., Cortina J., Bautista S. and Bellot J. 2003. Does Pinus halepensis facilitate the establishment of shrubs in Mediterranean semi-arid afforestations? Forest Ecology and Management 176: 147-160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. MAPA 1995. Segundo Inventario Forestal Nacional 1986-1995. Comunidad Valenciana. Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación. Madrid.Google Scholar
  53. MAPA 1997. Anuario de Estadística Agraria 1997. Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación. Madrid.Google Scholar
  54. Mesón M. and Montoya M. 1993. Selvicultura Mediterránea. Mundi-Prensa, Madrid, España.Google Scholar
  55. Moravec J. 1990. Regeneration of N.W. Africa Pinus halepensis forests following fire. Vegetatio 87: 29-36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Muzzi E., Roffi F., Sirotti M. and Bagnaresi U. 1997. Revegetation techniques on clay soil slopes in northern Italy. Land Degradation and Development 8: 127-137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ne'eman G. 1997. Regeneration of natural pine forest - review of work done after the 1989 fire in Mount Carmel, Israel. International Journal of Wildland Fire 7: 295-306.Google Scholar
  58. Ne'eman G., Lahav H. and Izhaki I. 1992. Spatial pattern of seedlings 1 year after fire in a Mediterranean pine forest. Oecologia 91: 365-370.Google Scholar
  59. Ne'eman G. 2000. The effect of burned pine trees on post-fire regeneration. In: Ne'eman G. and Trabaud L. (eds), Ecology, Biogeography and Management of Pinus halepensis and P. brutia Forest Ecosystems in the Mediterranean Basin. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands, pp. 303-320.Google Scholar
  60. Nunes M.A., Catarino F. and Pinto E. 1989. Strategies for acclimation to seasonal drought in Ceratonia siliqua leaves. Physiologia Plantarum 77: 150-156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Nuñez M.R. and Calvo L. 2000. Effect of high temperatures on seed germination of Pinus sylvestris and Pinus halepensis. Forest Ecology and Management 131: 183-190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ortuño F. 1990. El Plan para la repoblación forestal de España del año 1939. Análisis y comentarios. Ecología, Fuera de Serie 1: 373-392.Google Scholar
  63. Pausas J.G. 1999. The response of plant functional types to changes in the fire regime in Mediterranean ecosystems. A simulation approach. Journal of Vegetation Science 10: 717-722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pausas J.G. in press. Changes in fire and climate in the eastern Iberian Peninsula (Mediterranean basin). Climatic Change.Google Scholar
  65. Pausas J.G. and Vallejo V.R. 1999. The role of fire in European Mediterranean ecosystems. In: Chuvieco E. (ed), Remote sens220 ing of large wildfires in the European Mediterranean basin. Springer-Verlag, pp. 3-16.Google Scholar
  66. Pausas J.G., Gimeno T. and Vallejo R. 2002. Fire severity and pine regeneration in the eastern Iberian Peninsula. In: Viegas D.X. (ed), Forest Fire Research and Wildland Fire Safety. Millpress, Rotterdam (electronic edition).Google Scholar
  67. Pausas J.G., Ouadah N., Ferran A., Gimeno T. and Vallejo R. 2003. Fire severity and seedling establishment in Pinus halepensis woodlands, eastern Iberian Peninsula. Plant Ecology 169: 205-213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pérez B. 1997. Factores que controlan la variabilidad espacial de la respuesta de la vegetación al fuego en la sierra de Gredos: Usos del territorio e intensidad del fuego. PhD thesis, UCLM, Madrid.Google Scholar
  69. Piñol J., Terradas J. and Lloret F. 1998. Climate warming, wild-fire hazard, and wildfire occurrence in coastal eastern Spain. Climatic Change 38: 345-357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Querejeta J.I., Roldán A., Albaladejo J. and Castillo V. 1998. The role of mycorrhizae, site preparation, and organic amendment in the afforestation of a semi-arid Mediterranean site with Pinus halepensis. Forest Science 43: 203-211.Google Scholar
  71. Rodrigo A., Broncano M.J. and Retana J. 1999. Regeneration patterns of Mediterranean forest communities after large wildfires: Is autosuccession the only response? In: Proceedings of the Symposium “Forest Fires: Needs and innovations" held in Athens, 18-19 November 1999. DELFI Concerted Action, CINAR-EC, DG XII, pp. 291-294.Google Scholar
  72. Seva J.P., Vilagrosa A., Valdecantos A., Cortina J., Vallejo V.R. and Bellot J. 1996. Mycorhization et application du compost urbain pour l'amélioration de la survie et de la croissance des semis de Quercus ilex ssp. ballota en milieu sec. Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes 20: 105-121.Google Scholar
  73. Sheriff D.W., Nambiar E.K.S. and Fife D.N. 1986. Relationships between nutrient status, carbon assimilation and water use ef-ficiency in Pinus radiata (D. Don) needles. Tree Physiology 2: 73-88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Tapias R., Gil L., Fuentes-Utrilla P. and Pardos J.A. 2001. Canopy seed banks in Mediterranean pines of south eastern Spain: a comparison between Pinus halepensis Mill., P. pinaster Ait., P. nigra Arn. and P. pinea L. Journal of Ecology 89: 629-638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Thanos C.A. and Daskalakou E.N. 2000. Reproduction in Pinus halepensis and Pinus brutia. In: Ne'eman G. and Trabaud L. (eds), Ecology, Biogeography and Management of Pinus halepensis and P. brutia Forest Ecosystems in the Mediterranean Basin. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands, pp. 79-90.Google Scholar
  76. Thanos C.A., Daskalakou E.N. and Nikolaidou S. 1996. Early post-fire regeneration of a Pinus halepensis forests on Mountain Párnis, Greece. Journal of Vegetation Science 7: 273-280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Tsitsoni T. 1997. Conditions determining natural regeneration after wildfires in the Pinus halepensis (Miller, 1768) forests of Kassandra Peninsula (North Greece). Forest Ecology and Management 92: 199-208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Trabaud L. and Campant C. 1991. Difficulté de recolonisation naturelle du pin de Salzmann Pinus nigra Arn. spp. salzmanii (Dunal) Franco après incendie. Biological Conservation 58: 329-343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Trabaud L., Michels C. and Grosman J. 1985. Recovery of burnt Pinus halepensis Mill. forests. II. Pine reconstitution after wild-fire. Forest Ecology and Management 13: 167-179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Tripepi R.R., George M.W., Duroese R.K. and Wenny D.L. 1991. Birch seedling response to irrigation frequency and a hydrophilic polymer amendment in a container medium. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 9: 119-123.Google Scholar
  81. Valdecantos A. 2001. Aplicación de fertilizantes orgánicos e inorgánicos en la repoblación de zones forestales degradadas de la Comunidad Valenciana. PhD. Thesis. Universitat d’Alacant.Google Scholar
  82. Valdecantos A., Vilagrosa A., Seva J.P., Cortina J., Vallejo V.R. and Bellot J. 1996. Mycorhization et application du compost urbain pour l’amélioration de la survie et de la croissance des semis de Pinus halepensis en milieu semiaride. Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes 20: 87-104.Google Scholar
  83. Vallejo V.R. and Alloza J.A. 1998. The restoration of burned lands: the case of Eastern Spain. In: Moreno J.M. (ed), Large Forest Fires. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands, pp. 91-108.Google Scholar
  84. Vázquez F.M. 1998. Semillas de Quercus: Biología, Ecología y Manejo. Junta de Extremadura, Badajoz.Google Scholar
  85. Viero P.W.M., Little K.M. and Oscroft, D.G. 2000. The effect of a soil-amended hydrogel on the establishment of a Eucalyptus grandis x E. camaldulensis clone grown on the sandy soils of Zululand. South African Forestry Journal 188: 21-28.Google Scholar
  86. Vilagrosa A., Cortina J., Gil E. and Bellot J. 2003. Suitability of drought-preconditioning techniques in Mediterranean climate. Restoration Ecology 11: 208-216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Vilagrosa A., Caturla R.N., Hernández N., Cortina J., Bellot J. and Vallejo V.R. 2001. Reforestación en ambiente semiárido del sureste peninsular. Resultados de las investigaciones desarrolladas para optimizar la supervivencia y el crecimiento de especies autóctonas. In: Montes para la sociedad del nuevo milenio. III Congreso Forestal Español. Junta de Andalucia-Consejeria de Medio Ambiente. vol. 4-5, pp. 213-219.Google Scholar
  88. Villar-Salvador P., Ocaña L., Peñuelas J.L. and Carrasco S. 1999. Effect of water stress conditioning on the water relations, root growth capacity, and the nitrogen and non-structural carbohydrate concentration of Pinus halepensis Mill. (Aleppo pine) seedlings. Annals of Forest Science 56: 459-465.Google Scholar
  89. Verdú M. and García-Fayos P. 1996. Nucleation processes in a Mediterranean bird-dispersed plant. Functional Ecology 10: 275-280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Whisenant S.G. 1999. Repairing Damaged Wildlands. A processoriented, landscape-scale approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juli G. Pausas
    • 1
    • 2
  • Carme Bladé
    • 1
  • Alejandro Valdecantos
    • 1
  • José P. Seva
    • 1
  • David Fuentes
    • 1
  • José A. Alloza
    • 1
  • Alberto Vilagrosa
    • 1
  • Susana Bautista
    • 2
  • Jordi Cortina
    • 2
  • Ramon Vallejo
    • 1
  1. 1.CEAM Centro de Estudios Ambientales del Mediterráneo, C. Charles Darwin 14Paterna, ValènciaSPAIN
  2. 2.Departament d'EcologiaUniversitat d'AlacantAlacantSPAIN

Personalised recommendations