Plant Ecology

, Volume 170, Issue 2, pp 203–222

Mountain summer farms in Røldal, western Norway –; vegetation classification and patterns in species turnover and richness

  • V. Vandvik
  • H.J.B. Birks
Article

Abstract

This paper discusses vegetation types and diversity patterns in relation to environment and land-use at summer farms, a characteristic cultural landscape in the Norwegian mountains. Floristic data (189 taxa) were collected in 130 4-m2 sample plots within 12 summer farms in Røldal, western Norway. The study was designed to sample as fully as possible the range of floristic, environmental, and land-use conditions. Vegetation types delimited by two-way indicator species analysis were consistent with results from earlier phytosociological studies. Detrended correspondence analysis and canonical correspondence analysis show that rather than being distinct vegetation types, the major floristic variation is structured along a spatial gradient from summer farm to the surrounding heathland vegetation. Species richness (alpha diversity) was modelled against environmental variables by generalized linear modelling and compositional turnover (beta diversity) by canonical correspondence analysis. Most environmental factors made significant contributions, but the spatial distance-to-farm gradient was the best predictor of both species richness and turnover. While summer farms reduce mean species richness at the plot scale, the compositional heterogeneity of the upland landscapes is increased, thereby creating ‘ecological room’ for additional vegetation types and species. Within an overall similarity across scales, soil variables (pH, base saturation, LOI, phosphate and nitrogen) differed considerably in their explanatory power for richness and turnover. A difference between ‘productivity limiting’ factors and ‘environmental sieves’ is proposed as an explanation. Species turnover with altitude is relatively low in grasslands as compared to heaths.

(Detrended) (canonical) Correspondence analysis Classification Cultural landscapes Diversity Environmental effects Generalized linear modelling Grazing animal effects Land-use effects Species richness Species turnover 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aase K. 1981. Heavy application of farmyard manure to green fodder turnips and grassland. Forskn. Fors. Landbr. 32: 65–73.Google Scholar
  2. Amiaud B., Bonis A. and Bouzillé J.-B. 2000. Conditions de germination et rôle des herbivores dans la dispersion et le recrutement d'une espèce clonale: Juncus gerardii Lois. Can. J. Bot. 78: 1430–1439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aune B. 1993. Temperaturnormaler, Normalperiode 1961–1990. Det Norske Meteorologiske Institutt, Oslo.Google Scholar
  4. Austrheim G. and Eriksson O. 2001. Plant species diversity and grazing in the Scandinavian mountains – patterns and processes at different spatial scales. Ecography 24: 683–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Austrheim G. 2001. Heterogeneity in semi-natural grasslands: the importance of the elevational gradient. Nord. J. Bot. 21: 291–303.Google Scholar
  6. Austrheim G. 2002. Plant diveristy patterns in semi-natural grasslands along an elevational gradient in southern Norway. Plant Ecol. 161: 193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Austrheim G., Olsson E.G.A. and Grøntvedt E. 1999. Land-use impact on plant communities in semi-natural sub-alpine grasslands of Budalen, central Norway. Biol. Cons. 87: 369–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baadshaug O.H. 1983. Fertilisation and liming of mountain pasture. III. Effects on botanical composition. Forskn. Fors. Landbr. 34: 259–268.Google Scholar
  9. Bernes C. 1993. The Nordic Environment – Present State, Trends, and Threats. NORD-reports. The Nordic Council of Ministers, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  10. Birks H.J.B., Berge F., Boyle J.F. and Cumming B.F. 1990. A palaeoecological test of the land-use hypothesis for recent lake acidification in South-West Norway using hill-top lakes. J. Paleolimnol. 4: 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bjørgo T., Kristoffersen S. and Prescott C. 1992. Arkeologiske undersøkelser i Nyset-Steggje vassdragene 1981–1987. Hist. Mus. Univ. Bergen Arkeol. Rapp. 16: 1–314.Google Scholar
  12. Bjørnestad O.N. 1991. Changes in forest soils and vegetation in Søgne, southern Norway, during a 20 year period. Holarct. Ecol. 14: 234–244.Google Scholar
  13. Bonard A. and Dubost M. 1992. Diagnostic agro-écologique de la végétation des alpages latitiers des Alpes du Nord humides: établissement et utilisation d'une typologie simplifiée. Agronomie 12: 581–599.Google Scholar
  14. Bryn A. and Daugstad K. 2001. Summer farming in the subalpine birch forest. In: Wielgolaski F.E. (ed.), Nordic Mountain Birch Ecosystems. Man and the Biosphere Series. Vol. 27. The Parthenon Publishing Group, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Crawley M.J. 1993. GLIM for Ecologists. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp. 307–315.Google Scholar
  16. Dahl E. 1957. Rondane. Mountain vegetation in South Norway and its relation to the environment. Skr. norske Vidensk-Akad. I. Mat.-naturv. Kl 3: 1–374, 1956.Google Scholar
  17. Dahl E. 1988. Acidification of soils in the Rondane Mountains, South Norway, due to acid precipitation. Økoforsk rapp. 1: 1–53, 1988.Google Scholar
  18. Dahl E., Gjems O. and Kielland-Lund J. Jr 1967. On the Vegetation Types of Norwegian Conifer Forests in Relation to the Chemical Properties of the Humus Layer. Meddr. norske Skogfors. Ves. 85: 505–531.Google Scholar
  19. Edelmann A. 1997. Utmarksbeitet. Den glemte ressurs. In: Monsen M. (ed.), Levende Vern. Den Norske Turistforening, Oslo, pp. 46–51.Google Scholar
  20. Ellenberg H. 1988. Vegetation Ecology of Central Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  21. Etherington J.R. 1975.Environment and Plant Ecology. Wiley, London.Google Scholar
  22. Fægri K. 1988. Preface. In: Birks H.H., Birks H.J.B., Kaland P.E.and Moe D. (eds), The Cultural Landscape Past, Present, and Future. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
  23. Fægri K. 1960. Maps of Distribution of Norwegian Vascular Plants. I. Coast Plants. Oslo University Press, Oslo.Google Scholar
  24. Førland E.J. 1993. Nedbørnormaler, Normalperiode 1961–1990. Det Norske Meteorologiske Institutt, Oslo.Google Scholar
  25. Fremstad E. and Moen A. (eds) 2001. Threatened Vegetation Types in Norway. NTNU Vitenskapsmuseet Rapp. Bot. Serie., 1–231.Google Scholar
  26. Frödin J. 1929. Om fäbodsbebyggelsens utbredning ock olika typer i Europa. Svensk Geografisk Årsbok. Sydsv. Geogr. Sällskapet, Lund.Google Scholar
  27. Gorham E. 1953. The development of the humus layer in some woodlands of the English Lake District. J. Ecol. 41: 123–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grime J.P. 1979. Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. John Wiley & Sons, Chiester.Google Scholar
  29. Grytnes J.-A. 2000. Fine-scale vascular plant species richness in different alpine vegetation types: relationships with biomass and cover. Journal of Vegetation Science 11: 87–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hill M.O. and Gauch H.G. Jr 1980. Detrended correspondence analysis: An improved ordination technique. Vegetatio. 42: 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hill M.O. 1979. TWINSPAN – A FORTRAN program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two-way table by classification of individuals and attributes. Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  32. Hobbs R.J. and Hunneke L.F. 1992. Disturbance, diversity, and invasion: implications for conservation. Conserv. Biol. 6: 324–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Holzner W. 1978. Weed species and weed communities. Vegetatio. 38: 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Huston 1994. Biological Diversity – The Coexistence of Species on Changing Landscapes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  35. Huston M. and DeAngelis D.L. 1994. Competition and coexistence: the effects of resource transport and supply rates. American Naturalist 144: 954–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Knatterud B. 1974. En plantesosiologisk undersøkelse av vegetasjonen på sætervollene i Grimsdalen. Real, Cand. Real thesis Univ., Oslo.Google Scholar
  37. Krog H., Østhagen H. and Tønsberg T. 1980. Lav flora. Norske busk – og bladlav. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo.Google Scholar
  38. Kvamme M. 1988. Pollen Analytical Studies of Mountain Summer-Farming in Western Norway. In: Birks H.H. (ed.), The Cultural Landscape – Past, Present, and Future. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 349–367.Google Scholar
  39. Kvamme M., Berge J. and Kaland P.E. 1992. Vegetasjonshistoriske undersøkelser i Nyset-Steggje vassdragene. Hist. Mus. Univ. Bergen Arkeol. Rapp. 17: 1–132.Google Scholar
  40. Lawton J. 1999. Time to reflect: Gilbert White and environmental change. Oikos 87: 476–478.Google Scholar
  41. Lid J. 1985. Norsk, Svensk, Finsk flora. 5th edn. Det norske Samlaget, Oslo.Google Scholar
  42. Lid J. and Lid D.T. Elven R. (ed.) 1994. Norsk Flora. Det norske samlaget, Oslo.Google Scholar
  43. Losvik M. 1993. Hay meadow communities in Western Norway and relations between vegetation and environmental factors. Nord. J. Bot. 13: 95–206.Google Scholar
  44. McCullagh P. and Nelder J.A. 1989. Generalized Linear Models. 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
  45. Milchunas D.G., Sala O.E. and Lauenroth W.K. 1988. A generalized model of the effects of grazing by large herbivores on grassland community structure. Am. Nat. 132: 87–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mossberg B. 1992. Den Nordiska Floran. Wahlström and Widstrand, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  47. Naterstad J., Andresen A. and Jorde K. 1973. Tectonic succession of the Caledonian Nappe Front in the Haukelisæter-Røldal Area, Southwestern Norway. Nor. Geol. Unders. 292: 1–20.Google Scholar
  48. Nordhagen R. 1943. Sikilsdalen og Norges fjellbeiter. Bergens Mus. Skr. 22: 1–607.Google Scholar
  49. Nordic Council of Ministers 1989. Rekommendiationer för kulturlandskapet. Nordiska ministerrådet miljørapport 1989 5: 1–112.Google Scholar
  50. Odland A. and Birks H.J.B. 1999. The altitudinal gradient of vascular plant richness in Aurland, western Norway. Ecography 22: 548–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Odland A. 1981. Pre-and subalpine tall herb vegetation in Røldal, W Norway. Nord. J. Bot. 1: 671–690.Google Scholar
  52. Oke T.R. 1987. Boundary Layer Climates. 2nd edn. Methuen & Co., NY, USA.Google Scholar
  53. Økland T. 1988. An ecological approach to the investigation of a beech forest in Vestfold, SE Norway. Nord. J. Bot. 8: 375–407.Google Scholar
  54. Oksanen J. and Minchin P.R. 1997. Instability of ordination results under changes in input data order: explanations and remedies. J. Veg. Sci. 8: 447–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Olsson E.G.A. 1998. The roles of humans in shaping biodiversity through environmental manipulation. In: Fielder P.L. and Kareiva P. (eds), Conservation Biology. 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  56. Orloci L. 1967. An agglomerative method for the classification of plant communities. J. Ecol. 55: 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Palmer M.W. and Dixon P.M. 1990. Small-scale environmental heterogeneity and the analysis of distributions along gradients. J. Veg. Sci. 1: 57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Palmer M.W. 1993. Putting things in even better order: the advantages of canonical correspondence analysis. Ecology 74: 2215–2230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pausas J.G. 1994. Species richness patterns in the understory of Pyrenean Pinus sylvestris forest. J. Veg. Sci. 5: 517–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pedersen B. 1989. Distributional patterns of vascular plants in Fennoscandia: a numerical approach. Nordic J. Bot. 19: 163–189.Google Scholar
  61. Pedersen B. 1990. Distributional patterns of vascular plants in Fennoscandia: a numerical approach. Nord. J. Bot. 10: 163–189.Google Scholar
  62. Pulliam H.R. 1988. Sources, sinks, and population regulation. American Naturalist 132: 652–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Randers K. and Kvamme M. 1992. Breheimenundersøkelsene 1982–1984. II. Hist. Mus. Univ. Bergen Arkeol. Rapp. 16., Bergen.Google Scholar
  64. Reinton L. 1955, 1957, 1961. Sæterbruket i Noreg I, II, & III. Institutt for Sammenlignende Kulturforskning, Serie B, Skrifter, XLVIII., Oslo.Google Scholar
  65. Resvoll-Holmsen H. 1920. Om fjeldvegetationen i det østenfjeldske Norge. Arch. Mat. Naturv. 37: 1–266.Google Scholar
  66. Rhinschede G. 1988. Transhumance in European and American mountains. In: Allan N.J.R., Knapp G. and Stadel C. (eds), Human Impact on Mountains. Rowman & Littlefield, Maryland, NJ, USA, pp. 109–115.Google Scholar
  67. Røsberg I. 1984. Rettleiing i analyse av jord og plantemateriale. Laboratory manual. Botanical institute, Univ., Bergen.Google Scholar
  68. SAS Institute 1997. SAS (Computer Package). SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
  69. Schroeder D. 1984. Soils: Facts and Concepts. International Potash Institute, Bern.Google Scholar
  70. Selsjord I. 1966. Vegetation and Pasture Investigations in Mountain Districts of Norway. Forskn. Fors. Landbr. 17: 325–381.Google Scholar
  71. Shmida A. and Wilson M.V. 1985. Biological determinants of species diversity. Journal of Biogeography 12: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Šmilauer P. 1993. Canodraw 3.0. Microcomputer Power. Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
  73. Smith A.J.E. 1978. The Moss Flora of Britain & Ireland. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  74. Smith A.J.E. 1990. The Liverworts of Britain & Ireland. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  75. Spatz G. 1980. Succession patterns on mountain pastures. Vegetatio. 43: 39–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Stanners D. and Bordeau P. 1995. Europe's Environment. The Dobris Assessment. European Environmental Agency, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  77. Sterten A.K. 1974. Hardangerviddas klima. Nor. Off. Utr. 1974 30B: 32–38.Google Scholar
  78. Szabó M. 1970. Herdar ock husdjur. En etnologisk studie över Skandinaviens och Mellaneuropas beteskultur och vallningsorganisasjon. Nordiska museets handlingar, Lund.Google Scholar
  79. ter Braak C.J.F. 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67: 1167–1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. ter Braak C.J.F. 1987. CANOCO – A FORTRAN program for canonical community ordination by (partial) (detrended) (canonical) correspondance analysis, principal components analysis, and redundancy analysis (version 2.1). TNO Institute for Applied Computer Science, Statistics Department, Wageningen.Google Scholar
  81. ter Braak C.J.F. 1990. Update Notes: Canoco Version 3.10. Agricultural Mathematical Group, Wageningen.Google Scholar
  82. Tyler G. 1987. Probable effects of Soil Acidification and Nitrogen Deposition on the Floristic Composition of Oak (Quercus robur L.) Forest. Flora 179: 165–170.Google Scholar
  83. Vandvik V. and Birks H.J.B. 2002a. Partitioning floristic variance in Norwegian upland grasslands into within-site and betweensite components: Are the patterns determined by environment or by land-use? Plant Ecol. 162: 233–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Vandvik V. and Birks H.J.B. 2002b. Pattern and process in Norwegian upland grasslands – the relative importance of environmental factors and grazing effects can be elucidated by plant functional responses. J. Veg. Sci. 13: 123–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Vetaas O.R. 1997. The effect of canopy disturbance on species richness in central Himalayan oak forest. Plant Ecol. 132: 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wallis de Vries M., Poschlod P. and Willems J. 2002. Challenges for the conservation of calcareous grasslands in northwestern Europe: integrating the requirements of flora and fauna. Biol. Conserv. 104: 265–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Whittaker R.H. 1975. Dominance and diversity in land plant communities. Science 147: 250–260.Google Scholar
  88. Zobel M. 1997. The relative role of species pools in determining plant species richness: an alternative explanation of species coexistence? Trends Ecol. Evol. 12: 266–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Zobel M. 1992. Plant species coexistence – the role of historical, evolutionary, and ecological factors. Oikos 65: 314–320.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Vandvik
    • 1
  • H.J.B. Birks
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BotanyUniversity of BergenBergenNorway
  2. 2.Environmental Change Research CentreUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations