User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 119–144 | Cite as

Personalcasting: Tailored Broadcast News

  • Mark Maybury
  • Warren Greiff
  • Stanley Boykin
  • Jay Ponte
  • Chad McHenry
  • Lisa Ferro
Article

Abstract

Broadcast news sources and newspapers provide society with the vast majority of real-time information. Unfortunately, cost efficiencies and real-time pressures demand that producers, editors, and writers select and organize content for stereotypical audiences. In this article we illustrate how content understanding, user modeling, and tailored presentation generation promise personalcasts on demand. Specifically, we report on the design and implementation of a personalized version of a broadcast news understanding system, MITRE’s Broadcast News Navigator (BNN), that tracks and infers user content interests and media preferences. We report on the incorporation of Local Context Analysis to both expand the user’s original query to the most related terms in the corpus, as well as to allow the user to provide interactive feedback to enhance the relevance of selected newsstories. We describe an empirical study of the search for stories on ten topics from a video corpus. By personalizing both the selection of stories and the form in which they are delivered, we provide users with tailored broadcast news. This individual news personalization provides more fine-grained content tailoring than current personalized television program level recommenders and does not rely on externally provided program metadata.

broadcast news personalization query expansion relevance feedback story selection user modeling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ardissono, L., Portis, F. and Torasso, P. 2001. Architecture of a System for the Generation of Personalization Electronic Programming Guides. Eighth International Conference on User Modeling: Workshop on Personalization in Future TV, Sonthofen, Germany. www. di.unito.it/~;liliana/UM01/ardissono-etal.pdf.Google Scholar
  2. Attar, R. and Fraenkel, A. 1977. Local Feedback in Full-Text Retrieval Systems. Journal of the Association of Computation Machinery, 24(3): 397–417.Google Scholar
  3. Bove, V.M. 1983. Personalcasting: Interactive Local Augmentation of Television Programming. Master’s thesis, MIT, 1983.Google Scholar
  4. Boykin, S. and Merlino, A. 1999. Improving Broadcast News Segmentation Processing. IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Computing Systems. Florence, Italy. 7–11 June 1999.Google Scholar
  5. Boykin, S. and Merlino, A. 2000. Machine Learning of Event Segmentation for News on Demand. Communications of the ACM, 43(2): 35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyle, C. and Encarnacion, A. O. 1994. An Adaptive Hypertext Reading System. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4(1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brusilovsky, P. 1996. Methods and Techniques of Adaptive Hypermedia. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 6(2-3): 87–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brusilovsky, P. 2001. Adaptive Hypermedia. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 11: 87–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Croft, W. B. and Harper, D. J. 1979. Using Probabilistic Models of Document Retrieval Without Relevance Information. Journal of Documentation, 35(4): 285–295.Google Scholar
  10. Hu, Q. 2003. Audio Hot Spotting. MITRE Sponsored Research Project. <http://www.mitre>. org/news/events/tech03/briefings/intelligent information/hu.pdfGoogle Scholar
  11. Kaplan, C., Fenwick, J. and Chen. J. 1993. Adaptive Hypertext Navigation based on User Goals and Context. User Modeling and User Adapted Interaction, 3(3): 193–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Koenemann, J. 1996. Supporting Interactive Information Retrieval Through Relevance Feedback. CHI 96 Doctoral Consortium. http://www.acm.org/sigchi/chi96/proceedings/ doctoral/Koenemann/Jk2 txt1.htm.Google Scholar
  13. Koenemann, J. and Belkin, N. 1996. A Case For Interaction: A Study of Interactive Information Retrieval Behavior and Effectiveness. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors and Computing Systems. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. ACM Press: NY. pp. 205 212. <http://www.acm.org/sigchi/chi96/proceedings/papers/> Koenemann/jk1 txt.htmGoogle Scholar
  14. Light, M. and Maybury, M. 2002. Personalized Multimedia Information Access: Ask Questions, Get Personalized Answers. Communications of the ACM, 45(5): 54–59. (www.acm.org/ <http://www.acm.org/> cacm/0502/0502toc.html). In: Brusilovsky, P. and Maybury, M. (eds). Special Section on The Adaptive Web.Google Scholar
  15. Linton, F., Joy, D., and Schaefer, H-P. 1999. Building User and Expert Models by Long-Term Observation of Application Usage. In:J. Kay (Ed.), UM99: User Modeling: In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference (pp. 129 138). New York: Springer Verlag. [Selected data are accessible from an archive on http://zeus.gmd.de/ml4um/Google Scholar
  16. Maybury, M. Feb. 2000. News on Demand: Introduction. Communications of the ACM, 43(2): 32–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Maybury, M., Merlino, A., and Morey, D. 1997. Broadcast News Navigation using Story Segments, ACM International Multimedia Conference, Seattle, WA, November 8-14, 381–391.Google Scholar
  18. Merlino, A. and Maybury, M. 1999. An Empirical Study of the Optimal Presentation of Multimedia Summaries of Broadcast News. In: Mani, I. and Maybury, M. (eds.) Automated Text Summarization, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Merlino, A. 2002. ViTAP News on Demand. Human Language and Technology Conference, San Diego, CA, March 25, 2002.Google Scholar
  20. Robertson, S. E. and Walker, S. 1994. Some Simple Effective Approximations to the 2-Poisson Model for ProbabilisticWeightedRetrieval. In: Proceedings of the 17thAnnualACM-SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 232–241. Reprinted in: K. Sparck Jones and P. Willett (eds) 1997, Readings in Information Retrieval. Morgan Kaufmann, 345 354.Google Scholar
  21. Salton, G. and Buckley, C. 1990. Improving Retrieval Performance by Relevance Feedback. Journal of the American Society for Information Science (JASIS), 41(4): 288–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Xu, J. and Croft, W. B. 1996. Query Expansion Using Local and Global Document Analysis. In: Proceedings of the 19th Annual ‘ACM-SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 4–11.Google Scholar
  23. Xu, J. and Croft, W. B. 2000. Improving the Effectiveness of Information Retrieval with Local Context Analysis. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 18(1): 79–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Maybury
    • 1
  • Warren Greiff
    • 1
  • Stanley Boykin
    • 1
  • Jay Ponte
    • 1
  • Chad McHenry
    • 1
  • Lisa Ferro
    • 1
  1. 1.Information Technology DivisionThe MITRE CorporationBedfordUSA

Personalised recommendations