Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture

, Volume 76, Issue 3, pp 255–260 | Cite as

Sugar Uptake and Utilisation during Adventitious Bud Differentiation on in Vitro Leaf Explants of ‘Wegierka Zwykła’ Plum (Prunus Domestica)

Abstract

Leaf explants of plum ‘Wegierka Zwykła’ were cultured on modified MS medium supplemented with 7.5 µM TDZ (thidiazuron) and 0.9 µM 2,4-D (2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid), with the addition of either sucrose or glucose at a concentration of 2%, 3%, 4%, 5% or 6% (w/v). Regeneration was carried out in two steps: the first in darkness, the second in photoperiod conditions after subculture onto fresh medium. The study assessed the influence of the kind of sugar used and its concentration in the medium on organogenesis efficiency, and on sugar uptake from the medium. The results suggest that sucrose is a better carbon source than glucose for organogenesis of ‘Wegierka Zwykła’, even though at lower concentrations the efficiency of the sugars was comparable. With increasing concentration of sugars, the efficiency of organogenesis decreased, a relation more evident for media with glucose. In the first (dark) step of regeneration, the explants utilised less carbohydrates from the media than in the second step, when the main increase of explant weight took place. In the second phase, at 2–5% concentrations glucose uptake was higher than sucrose uptake.

carbon source in vitro culture leaf explants Prunus Spp regeneration Sucrose and glucose 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aloni R (1980) Role of auxins and sucrose in the differentiation of sieve and trachery elements in plant tissue cultures. Planta 150: 255–263Google Scholar
  2. Bogunia H & Przywara L (1999) Rola cukrowców w roślinnych kulturach in vitro. Wiad. Bot. [Sugars in plant tissue culture] 43: 25–36Google Scholar
  3. Borkowska B & Szczerba J (1991) Influence of different carbon sources on invertase activity and growth of sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.) shoot cultures. J. Exp. Bot. 42: 911–915Google Scholar
  4. Borkowska B, Szczerba J & Kubik M (1995) Gospodarka cukrami w kulturach pêdowych wiśni odm. Łutówka. In: Dubert F & Skoczowski A (eds) Zastosowanie Kultur in vitro w Fizjologii Roślin [The sugar manemagent in shoot cultures of ‘Łutówka’ sour cherry. In: In vitro Application in Plant Physiology] (pp. 11–15). ZakŁad Fizjologii Roślin PAN Kraków (Poland)Google Scholar
  5. Cassells AC & Curry RF (2001) Oxaditive stress and physiological, epigenetic and genetic variability in plant tissue culture: implications for micropropagators and genetic engineers. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 64: 145–157Google Scholar
  6. Declerck V & Korban SS (1996) Influence of growth regulators and carbon sources on callus induction, growth and morphogenesis from leaf tissues of peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch). J. Hort. Sci. 71: 49–55Google Scholar
  7. De Riek J, Piqueras A & Deberegh PC (1997) Sucrose uptake and metabolism in a double layer system for micropropagation of Rosa multiflora. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 47: 269–278Google Scholar
  8. Gibson SI (2000) Plant sugar-response pathways. Part of a complex regulatory web. Plant Physiol. 124: 1532–1539Google Scholar
  9. Hammatt N (1993) Micropropagation of fastigiate bird cherry (Prunus padus L.) and adventitious shoot formation from leaves. J. Hort. Sci. 68: 975–981Google Scholar
  10. Karhu ST (1995) The quality of applied carbohydrates affects the auxilary branching of apple microshoots. Bull. Rech. Agron. Gembloux 30: 21–27Google Scholar
  11. Komor E, Thom M & Maretzki A (1981) The mechanism of sugar uptake by sugarcane suspension cells. Planta 153: 181–192Google Scholar
  12. Leva AR, Bartolini G, Muleo R, Biricoliti S & Benelli A (1990) Micromorphological studies on Actinidia cv. Harvard calli as influenced by different sugars. In: XXIII International Horticultural Congress (ed) Abstracts of Contributed Papers: 3123. Firenze (Italy)Google Scholar
  13. Lipavska H & Vreugdenhil D (1996) Uptake of mannitol from the media by in vitro grown plants. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 45: 103–107Google Scholar
  14. MaŁodobry A (1986) Mikrorozmnażanie śliwy odmiany W\(e\)gierka ZwykŁa. Praca doktorska, Akademia Rolnicza, Kraków, Poland (ed). [Micropropagation of ‘W\(e\)gierka ZwykŁa’ plum. Doctoral thesis. Agricultural University of Kraków (ed)]Google Scholar
  15. Martre P, Lecan D, Just D & Teisson C (2001) Physiological effects of temporary immersion on Hevea brasiliensis callus. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 67: 25–35Google Scholar
  16. Mejbaum-Katzenellenbogen W & Mochnacka I (1966) Kurs praktyczny z biochemii. PWNWarszawa [Protocols in biochemistry]Google Scholar
  17. Murashige T & Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–479Google Scholar
  18. Nikolova P, Moo-Young M & Legge RL (1991) Application of process mass spectroscopy to the detection of metabolic changes in plant tissue culture. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 25: 219–224Google Scholar
  19. Nowak B & Miczyński K (1996) Regeneration capacity of Prunus domestica L. cv. W\(e\)gierka ZwykŁa from leaf explants of in vitro shoots using TDZ. Folia Hort. 1996 8/2: 41–49Google Scholar
  20. Nowak B (1998) The application of alternative sources of carbon in medium for regeneration of prunus (Prunus domestica L.) cv. W\(e\)gierka ZwykŁa from leaf explants. Acta Physiol. Plant. 20: 29Google Scholar
  21. Rennert A (1977) Metabolic aspects of growth in HV-treated crowngall tissue cultures. Acta. Soc. Bot. Poloniae 1: 79–99Google Scholar
  22. Steinitz B (1999) Sugar alcohols display nonosmotic roles in regulating morphogenesis and metabolism in plants that do not produce polyols as primary photosynthetic products. J. Plant Physiol. 155: 1–8Google Scholar
  23. Sudha G & Ravishankar GA (2002) Involvement and interaction of various signaling compounds on the plant metabolic events during defence response, resistance to stress factors, formation of secondary metabolites and their molecular aspects. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 25: 181–212Google Scholar
  24. Thorpe TA (1978) Physiological and biochemical aspects of organogenesis in vitro. In: International Association for Plant Tissue Culture (ed) Proceedings of the 4th International Congress of Plant Tissue and Cell Culture (pp. 49–58). Calgary, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  25. Tran Thanh Van K (1977) Regulation of Morphogenesis. In: Barz W, Reinhard E & Zenk MH (eds) Proceedings of the First International Congress on Medicinal Plant Research Plant Tissue Culture and Bio-technological Application (pp. 367–385). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Welander M, Welander NT & Brackman A (1989) Regulation of in vitro shoot multiplication in Syringa, Alnus, and Malus by different carbon sources. J. Hort. Sci. 64: 361–363Google Scholar
  27. Wróblewski TA (1994) Proces somatycznej embriogenezy – charakterystyka szczegóŁowa. Post. Biol. Kom. 21, suppl.4: 11–32Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara Nowak
    • 1
  • Kazimierz Miczyński
    • 1
  • Ludwik Hudy
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BotanyAgricultural University of KrakówKrakówPoland
  2. 2.Department of Technical MechanicsAgricultural University of KrakówKrakówPoland

Personalised recommendations