Advertisement

Telecommunication Systems

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 33–52 | Cite as

Dynamic Aggregation of Reservations for Internet Services

  • Roland Bless
Article

Abstract

Global availability of on-demand services with an associated guaranteed quality-of-service (QoS) is still missing in the Internet today. The Differentiated Services architecture achieves scalability in the data plane by treating all flows with a specific type of service as one aggregate. In order to provide guaranteed end-to-end reservations, the control plane (e.g., performing admission control and management of resource reservations) has to be scalable as well. The DARIS architecture provides this essential linkage between scalability in the packet forwarding path and scalability of QoS management in the Internet. It comprises a novel concept of dynamic and hierarchical aggregation, which acts on the network level of autonomous systems (ASes). This relieves management entities in intermediate ASes of processing load by reducing their managed reservation states as well as the number of signaling messages that have to be processed significantly. Moreover, novel and special support for aggregation by a dedicated signaling protocol mechanism is provided.

differentiated services resource management reservation aggregation signaling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    F. Baker, D. Black, S. Blake and K. Nichols, Definition of the differentiated services field (DS field) in the IPv4 and IPv6 headers, RFC 2474 (standard) (1998).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Y. Bernet, R. Yavatkar, P. Ford, F. Baker, L. Zhang, M. Speer, B. Braden, B. Davie, E. Felstaine and J. Wroclawski, A framework for integrated services operation over DiffServ networks, RFC 2998 (informational) (2000).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    S. Blake, D. Black, M. Carlson, E. Davies, Z. Wang and W. Weiss, An architecture for differentiated services, RFC 2475 (informational) (1998).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    R. Braden, D. Clark and S. Shenker, Integrated services in the Internet architecture: An overview, RFC 1633 (informational) (1994).Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    B. Davie, A. Charny, F. Baker, J. Bennet, K. Benson, J.-Y.L. Boudec, A. Chiu, W. Courtney, S. Davari, V. Firoiu, C. Kalmanek, K. Ramakrishnam and D. Stiliadis, An expedited forwarding PHB (Per-Hop Behavior), RFC 3246 (2002).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    V. Jacobson, K. Nichols and L. Zhang, A two-bit differentiated services architecture for the Internet, RFC 2638 (informational) (1999).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    D. Meyer, Route views project page, http://www.routeviews.org/ (2002).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    P. Pan, E.L. Hahne and H. Schulzrinne, BGRP: Sink-tree-based aggregation for inter-domain reservations, Special Issue on QoS in IP Networks of Journal of Communications and Networks 2(2) (2000) 157-167.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    O. Schelén and S. Pink, Aggregating resource reservations over multiple routing domains, in: Proc. of IFIP 6th Internat. Workshop on Quality of Service (IWQOS'98), IFIP (IEEE Press, New York, 1998).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    O. Schelén and S. Pink, Resource sharing in advance reservation agents, Special Issue on Multimedia Networking of Journal of High Speed Networks 7(3/4) (1998).Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    B. Teitelbaum and P. Cimento, QBone bandwidth broker architecture, Working Document of the QBone Bandwidth Broker Work Group, http://qbone.internet2.edu/bb/ bboutline2.html (2000).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    A. Varga, OMNeT++ discrete event simulation system 2.3, http://www.omnetpp.org/ (2003).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roland Bless
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of TelematicsUniversity of KarlsruheKarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations