Systematic Parasitology

, Volume 57, Issue 3, pp 159–171 | Cite as

The evolution of the Proteocephalidea (Platyhelminthes, Eucestoda) based on an enlarged molecular phylogeny, with comments on their uterine development

  • Alain de Chambrier
  • Marc Zehnder
  • Claude Vaucher
  • Jean Mariaux
Article

Abstract

We present a molecular phylogeny of the Proteocephalidea based on 28S rDNA sequence data that is a follow-up to the paper by Zehnder & Mariaux (1999). Twenty-three new sequences, including three outgroups are added in our new data-set. The Gangesiinae Mola, 1929 and the Acanthotaeniinae Freze, 1963 appear to be the most primitive clades. They are followed by a robust clade comprising the Palaearctic Proteocephalinae Mola, 1929 from freshwater fishes. The structure of the more derived clades, comprising most Neotropical and Nearctic species, is less resolved. At the nomenclatural level, we erect a new genus, Glanitaenia n. g. for G. osculata (Goeze, 1782) n. comb., previously Proteocephalus osculatus, and define an aggregate for the Palaearctic Proteocephalus Weinland, 1858. After a re-examination of all of the studied taxa, we identify two types of uterine development and show the importance of this character for the systematics of the order. Our phylogeny does not support the classical view of a Neotropical origin for the Proteocephalidea but rather favours an Old World origin of the group either in saurians or Palaearctic Siluriformes.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beveridge, I. (1994) Family Anoplocephalidae Cholodkosky. 1902. In: Khalil L.F., Jones A. & Bray R.A. (Eds) Keys to the cestode parasites of vertebrates, Wallingford: CAB International, pp. 315–366.Google Scholar
  2. Beveridge, I. (2003) Phylogenetic relationships of Anoplotaenia dasyuri (Cestoda) from dasyurid marsupials, with observations on uterine development in Cyclophyllideans. In: Combes, C. & Jourdane, J. (Eds). Taxonomie, écologie et évolution des métazoaires parasites. Livre-hommage à Louis Euzet. Perpignan: Presses Universitaires de Perpignan, Vol. 1, pp. 47–66.Google Scholar
  3. Bona, F. (1994) Family Dilepididae Railliet & Henry, 1909. In: Khalil L.F., Jones A. & Bray R.A. (Eds) Keys to the cestode parasites of vertebrates, Wallingford: CAB International, pp. 443–554.Google Scholar
  4. Brooks, D.R. (1978) Evolutionary history of the cestode order Proteocephalidea. Systematic Zoology, 27, 312–323.Google Scholar
  5. Brooks, D.R., Hoberg, E.P. & Weekes P.J. (1991) Preliminary phylogenetic systematic analysis of the major lineages of the Eucestoda (Platyhelminthes: Cercomeria). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 104, 651–668.Google Scholar
  6. Brooks, D.R. & Rasmussen, G. (1984) Proteocephalid cestodes from Venezuelan catfish, with a new classification of the Monticelliidae. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 97, 748–760.Google Scholar
  7. Cañeda-Guzmán, I.C. (1997) Parásitos de tres especies de Marsupiales de la Estación 'Los Tuxtlas' y algunas zonas cercanas, Veracruz, México. BSc Thesis. Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autonóma de México, 193 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Cañeda-Guzmán, I.C., de Chambrier, A. & Scholz, T. (2001) Thaumasioscolex didelphidis n. gen. and n. sp. (Eucestoda: Proteocephalidae) from the black-eared opossum Didelphis marsupialis fromMexico, the first proteocephalidean tapeworm from a mammal. Journal of Parasitology, 87, 639–646.Google Scholar
  9. Carfora, M., de Chambrier, A. & Vaucher, C. (2003) Le genre Amphoteromorphus (Cestoda: Proteocephalidea), parasite de poissons-chats d'Amérique tropicale: étude morphologique et approche biosystématique par électrophorèse des protéines. Revue Suisse de Zoologie, 110, 381–409.Google Scholar
  10. de Chambrier, A. (1988) Crepidobothrium garzonii n. sp. (Cestoda: Proteocephalidae) parasite de Bothrops alternatus Dum. Bibr. & Dum.1854 (Serpentes: Viperidae) au Paraguay. Revue Suisse de Zoologie, 95, 1163–1170.Google Scholar
  11. de Chambrier, A. (1990) Redescription de Proteocephalus paraguayensis (Rudin, 1917) (Cestoda: Proteocephalidae) parasite de Hydrodynastes gigas (Dum., Bibr. & Dum., 1854) du Paraguay. Systematic Parasitology, 16, 85–97.Google Scholar
  12. de Chambrier, A., d'Alessio, M.L. & de Azevedo Corrêa, F.M. (1991) Redescription de Proteocephalus jarara (Fuhrmann, 1927) (Cestoda: Proteocephalidae) parasite de Bothrops alternatus (Viperidae) au Brésil. Revue Suisse de Zoologie, 98, 15–32.Google Scholar
  13. de Chambrier, A. & Vaucher, C. (1994) Etude morpho-anatomique et génétique de deux nouveaux Proteocephalus Weinland, 1858 (Cestoda: Proteocephalidae) parasites de Platydoras costatus (L.), poisson siluriforme du Paraguay. Systematic Parasitology, 27, 173–185.Google Scholar
  14. de Chambrier, A. & Vaucher, C. (1997) Révision des cestodes (Monticelliidae) décrits par Woodland (1934) chez Brachyplatystoma filamentosum avec redéfinition des genres Endorchis Woodland, 1934 et Nomimoscolex Woodland, 1934. Systematic Parasitology, 37, 219–233.Google Scholar
  15. de Chambrier, A. & Vaucher, C. (1999) Proteocephalidae et Monticelliidae (Eucestoda: Proteocephalidea) parasites de poissons d'eau douce au Paraguay, avec descriptions d'un genre nouveau et de dix espèces nouvelles. Revue Suisse de Zoologie, 106, 165–240.Google Scholar
  16. Euzet, L. (1982) Problèmes posés par la spécificité parasitaire des cestodes Proteocephalidea et Pseudophyllidea parasites de poissons. Mémoires du Museum d'Histoire Naturelle, Série A, Zoologie, 123, 279–287.Google Scholar
  17. Fischer, H. & Freeman, R.S. (1969) Penetration of parenteral plerocercoids of Proteocephalus ambloplitis (Leidy) into the gut of smallmouth bass. Journal of Parasitology, 55, 766–774.Google Scholar
  18. Freze, V.I. (1965) [Essentials of Cestodology.] Vol. V. [Proteocephalata in fish, amphibians and reptiles.] Moskva: Izdatel'stvo Nauka, 538 pp. (In Russian: English translation, Israel Program of Scientific Translation, 1969, Cat. No. 1853. v + 597 pp).Google Scholar
  19. Gil de Pertierra, A.A. & de Chambrier, A. (2000) Rudophiella szidati sp. n. (Proteocephalidea: Monticelliidae, Rudolphiellinae) parasite of Luciopimelodus pati (Valenciennes, 1840) (Pisces: Pimelodidae) from Argentina with new observations on Rudolphiella lobosa (Riggenbach, 1895). Revue Suisse de Zoologie, 107, 81–95.Google Scholar
  20. Goeze, J.A.E. (1782) Versuch einer Naturgeschichte der eingeweidewürmer tierischer Körper. Blankenburg, 471 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Hanzelová, V. & Scholz, T. (1999) Species of Proteocephalus Weinland, 1858 (Cestoda: Proteocephalidae), parasites of coregonid and salmonid fishes from North America: taxonomic reappraisal. Journal of Parasitology, 85, 94–101.Google Scholar
  22. Hanzelová, V., Scholz, T. & Fagerholm, H.-P. (1995) Synonymy of Proteocephalus neglectus La Rue, 1911 with P. exiguus La Rue, 1911, two fish cestodes from the Holarctic Region. Systematic Parasitology, 30, 173–185.Google Scholar
  23. Hoberg, E.P., Jones, A. & Bray, R.A. (1999) Phylogenetic analysis among the families of the Cyclophyllidea (Eucestoda) based on comparative morphology, with new hypotheses for co-evolution in vertebrates. Systematic Parasitology, 42, 51–73.Google Scholar
  24. Hoffman, G.L. (1999) Parasites of North American freshwater fishes. Second Edition. Ithaca & London: Comstock Publishing Associates, Cornell University Press, 539 pp.Google Scholar
  25. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (1999) Fourth Edition. London: The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, xxix + 306 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Kodedová, I., Dolezel, D., Broucková, M., Jirku, M., Hypsa, V., Lukes, J. & Scholz, T. (2000) On the phylogenetic positions of the Caryophyllidea, Pseudophyllidea and Proteocephalidea (Eucestoda) inferred from 18S rRNA. International Journal for Parasitology, 30, 1109–1113.Google Scholar
  27. La Rue, G.R. (1911) A revision of the cestode family Proteocephalidae. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 38, 473–482.Google Scholar
  28. La Rue, G.R. (1914) A revision of the cestode family Proteocephalidae. Illinois Biological Monographs, 1, 1–349.Google Scholar
  29. Lockyer, A.E., Olson, P.D. & Littlewood, D.T.J. (2003) Utility of complete large and small subunit rRNA genes in resolving the phylogeny of the Neodermata (Platyhelminthes): implications and a review of the cercomer theory. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 78, 155–171.Google Scholar
  30. Lundberg, J.G., Marshall, L.G., Guerrero, J., Horton, B., Malabarba, M.C.S.L. & Wesselingh, F. (1998) The stage for Neotropical fish diversification: A history of tropical south American rivers. In: Malabarba, L.R., Reis, R.E., Vari, R.P., Lucena, Z.M.S. & Lucena, C.A.S. (Eds) Phylogeny and classification of Neotropical fishes. Porto Alegre: Edipucrs, pp. 13–48.Google Scholar
  31. Mariaux, J. (1998) A molecular phylogeny of the Eucestoda. Journal of Parasitology, 84, 114–124.Google Scholar
  32. Mariaux, J. & Olson, P.D. (2001) Cestode systematics in the molecular era. In: Littlewood, D.T.J & Bray, R.A. (Eds). Interrelationships of the Platyhelminthes. London: Taylor & Francis, pp. 127–134.Google Scholar
  33. Mo, T. (1991) Anatomy and systematics of Bagridae (Teleostei), and siluroid phylogeny. Königstein: Koeltz Scientific Books, 216 pp.Google Scholar
  34. Nybelin, O. (1942) Zur Helminthen Fauna der Süsswasserfische Schwedens. II. Die Cestodes desWelses. Göteborgs Kungl Vetenkaps Och Vitterhets-samhalles Handlingar Series B1, 1–24.Google Scholar
  35. Olson, P.D., Cribb, T.H., Tkach, V.V., Bray, R.A. & Littlewood, D.T.J. (2003) Phylogeny and classification of the Digenea (Platyhelminthes: Trematoda). International Journal for Parasitology, 33, 733–755.Google Scholar
  36. Olson, P.D. & Littlewood, D.T.J. (2002) Phylogenetics of the Monogenea-evidence from a medley of molecules. International Journal for Parasitology, 32, 233–244.Google Scholar
  37. Olson, P.D., Littlewood, T.J., Bray, R.A. & Mariaux, J. (2001) Interrelationships and evolution of the tapeworms (Platyhelminthes: Cestoda). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 19, 443–467.Google Scholar
  38. Rego, A.A. (1994) Order Proteocephalidea Mola, 1928. In: Khalil L.F., Jones A. & Bray R.A. (Eds) Keys to the cestode parasites of vertebrates, Wallingford: CAB International, pp. 257–293.Google Scholar
  39. Rego, A.A. (1995) A new classification of the cestode order Proteocephalidea Mola. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 12, 791–814.Google Scholar
  40. Rego, A.A. & de Chambrier, A. (1995) Crepidobothrium eirasi n. sp. (Cestoda: Proteocephalidae), a parasite of the siluroid fish Phractocephalus hemioliopterus (Schneider, 1801) (Pisces: Pimelodidae) from the Brazilian Amazon. Revue Suisse de Zoologie, 102, 3–11.Google Scholar
  41. Rego, A.A., de Chambrier, A., Hanzelová, V., Hoberg, E., Scholz, T., Weekes, P. & Zehnder, M. (1998) Preliminary phylogenetic analysis of subfamilies of the Proteocephalidea (Eucestoda). Systematic Parasitology, 40, 1–19.Google Scholar
  42. Rego, A.A., Chubb, J.C. & Pavanelli, G. C. (1999) Cestodes in South American freshwater teleost fishes: keys to genera and brief description of species. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 16, 299–367.Google Scholar
  43. Rego, A.A. & Ivanov, V. (2001) Pseudocrepidobothrium eirasi (Rego and de Chambrier, 1995) gen. n. and comb. nov. (Cestoda, Proteocephalidea), parasite of a South American freshwater fish, and comparative cladistic analysis with Crepidobothrium spp.Acta Scientarum, 23, 363–367.Google Scholar
  44. Rego, A.A., Machado, P.M. & Pavanelli, G.C. (1999) Sciadocephalus megalodiscus Diesing, 1850 (Cestoda: Corallobothriinae) a parasite of Cichla monoculus Spix, 1831 (Cichlidae), in the Paraná River, State of Paraná, Brazil. Journal of the Helminthological Society of Washington, 66, 133–137.Google Scholar
  45. Rødland, J.T. (1983) A redescription of the cestodes Proteocephalus filicollis (Rudolphi) from Gasterosteus aculeatus L., and P. ambiguus (Dujardin) from Pungitius pungitius (L.). Zoologica Scripta, 12, 19–23.Google Scholar
  46. Schmidt, G.D. (1986) CRC Handbook of tapeworm identification. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 675 pp.Google Scholar
  47. Scholz, T. (1999) Life cycles of species of Proteocephalus, parasites of fishes in the Palearctic Region: a review. Journal of Helminthology, 73, 1–18.Google Scholar
  48. Scholz, T. & de Chambrier, A. (2003) Taxonomy and biology of proteocephalidean cestodes: current state and perspectives. Helminthologia, 40, 65–77.Google Scholar
  49. Scholz, T., Drábek, R. & Hanzelová, V. (1998) Scolex morphology of Proteocephalus tapeworms (Cestoda: Proteocephalidae), parasites of freshwater fish in the Palaearctic Region. Folia Parasitologica, 45, 27–43.Google Scholar
  50. Scholz, T. & Hanzelová, V. (1998) Tapeworms of the genus Proteocephalus Weinland, 1858 (Cestoda: Proteocephalidae), parasites of fishes in Europe. Studie AV CR. Prague: Academia, 119 pp.Google Scholar
  51. Scholz, T. & Hanzelová, V. (1999) Species of Proteocephalus Weinland, 1858 (Cestoda: Proteocephalidae) from cyprinid fishes in North America. Journal of Parasitology, 85, 150–154.Google Scholar
  52. Shimazu, T. (1993) Redescription of Paraproteocephalus parasiluri (Yamaguti, 1934) n. comb. (Cestoidea: Proteocephalidae), with notes on four species of the genus Proteocephalus, from Japanese freshwater fishes. Journal of the Nagano Prefectural College, 48, 1–9.Google Scholar
  53. Skeríková, A., Hypsa, V. & Scholz, T. (2001) Phylogenetic analysis of European species of Proteocephalus (Cestoda: Proteocephalidea): compatibility of molecular and morphological data, and parasite-host coevolution. International Journal for Parasitology, 31, 1121–1128.Google Scholar
  54. Swofford, D.L. (2002) PAUP?. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (?and other methods). Version 4.0b10.Sunderland, Massachussets: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
  55. Telford, M.J., Lockyer, A.E., Cartwright, C. & Littlewood, D.T.J. (2003) Combined large and small subunit ribosomal RNA phylogenies support a basal position of the acoelomorph flatworms. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 270, 1077–1083.Google Scholar
  56. Willemse, J.J. (1968) Proteocephalus filicollis (Rudolphi, 1802) and Proteocephalus ambiguus (Dujardin, 1845), two hitherto confused species of cestodes. Journal of Helminthology, 42, 395–410.Google Scholar
  57. Woodland, W.N.F. (1934) On some remarkable new cestodes from the Amazon siluroid fish, Brachyplatystoma filamentosum (Lichtenstein). Parasitology, 26, 268–277.Google Scholar
  58. Woodland, W.N.F. (1935) Additional cestodes from the Amazon siluroids Pirarará, Dorad and Sudobim. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 104, 851–862.Google Scholar
  59. Zehnder, M.P. & Mariaux, J. (1999) Molecular systematic analysis of the order Proteocephalidea (Eucestoda) based on mitochondrial and nuclear rDNA sequences. International Journal for Parasitology, 29, 1841–1852.Google Scholar
  60. Zehnder, M.P. & de Chambrier, A. (2000) Morphological and molecular analyses of the genera Peltidocotyle Diesing, 1850, Othinoscolex and Woodlandiella (Eucestoda, Proteocephalidea), parasites of South American siluriform fishes (Pimelodidae). Systematic Parasitology, 46, 33–43.Google Scholar
  61. Zehnder, M.P., de Chambrier, A., Vaucher, C. & Mariaux, J. (2000) Nomimoscolex suspectus n. sp. (Eucestoda: Zygobothriinae) with morphological and molecular phylogenetic analysis of the genus. Systematic Parasitology, 47, 157–172.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alain de Chambrier
    • 1
  • Marc Zehnder
    • 1
  • Claude Vaucher
    • 1
  • Jean Mariaux
    • 1
  1. 1.Département des InvertébrésMuséum d'Histoire NaturelleGeneva 6Switzerland

Personalised recommendations