, Volume 141, Issue 1, pp 123–152 | Cite as

No End in Sight: Causal Loops in Philosophy, Physics and Fiction

  • Richard Hanley


There have been many objections to the possibility oftime travel. But all the truly interesting ones concern the possibility of reversecausation. What is objectionable about reverse causation? I diagnose that the trulyinteresting objections are to a further possibility: that of causal loops. I raisedoubts about whether there must be causal loops if reverse causation obtains; but devote themajority of the paper to describing, and dispelling concerns about, various kinds ofcausal loop. In short, I argue that they are neither logically nor physically impossible.The only possibly objectionable feature that all causal loops share is that coincidenceis required to explain them. Just how coincidental a loop will be varies: some arereally quite ordinary, and some are incredibly unlikely. I end by speculating thatthe tendency amongst physicists to avoid discussion of causal loops involving intentionalaction may have been unfortunate, since intentional action is an excellent way tonon-mysteriously bring about what otherwise would have been an unlikely coincidence. Hencecausal loops may be more likely in a world with beings like us, than in one without.


Reverse Causation Intentional Action Objectionable Feature Causal Loop Oftime Travel 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Berkovich, J.: 2001, 'On Chance in Causal Loops', Mind 437, 1–23.Google Scholar
  2. Clarke, C. J. S.: 1977, 'Time in General Relativity', in J. Earman, C. Glymour, and J. Stachel (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume VIII: Foundations of Space-Time Theories, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 94–108.Google Scholar
  3. Deutsch, D.: 1991, 'Quantum Mechanics near Closed Timelike Lines', Physical Review D 44, 3197–3217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dowe, P.: 2001, 'Causal Loops and the Independence of Causal Facts', Philosophy of Science 68, 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Faye, J.: 2001 'Backward Causation', in N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy(Winter 2001 Edition), URL = <>.Google Scholar
  6. Godfrey-Smith, W.: 1980, 'Traveling in Time', Analysis 40, 72–73.Google Scholar
  7. Grey [formerly Godfrey-Smith], W.: 1999, 'Troubles with Time Travel', Philosophy55–70.Google Scholar
  8. Hall, N.: 2000, 'Causation and the Price of Transitivity', Journal of Philosophy 97, 198–222.Google Scholar
  9. Harrison, J.: 1980, 'Report on AnalysisProblem No. 18', Analysis 40, 65–69.Google Scholar
  10. Levin, M.: 1980, 'Swords' Points', Analysis 40, 69–70.Google Scholar
  11. Lewis, D.: 1986, in D. Lewis, Philosophical Papers, Vol. II, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 67–80. (Reprint of Lewis, D.: 1976, 'The Paradoxes of Time Travel', American Philosophical Quarterly vn13, 145–152.)Google Scholar
  12. Lewis, D.: 1976, 'Survival and Identity', in A. Rorty (ed.), The Identities of Persons, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 17–40.Google Scholar
  13. Lossev, A. and I. Novikov: 1992, 'The Jinn of the Time Machine: Nontrivial Self-Consistent Solutions', Classical and Quantum Gravity 9, 2309–2321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mellor, H.: 1981, Real Time, Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Mellor, H.: 1995, The Facts of Causation, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  16. MacBeath, M.: 1982, 'Who was Dr Who's Father?', Synthese 51, 397–430.Google Scholar
  17. Moravec, H.: 1991, 'Time Travel and Computing', URL: Scholar
  18. Nahin, P.: 1999, Time Machines: Time Travel in Physics, Metaphysics, and Science Fiction, 2nd edn, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Nerlich, G.: 1981, 'Can Time Be Finite?', Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 62, 227–239.Google Scholar
  20. Niven, L.: 1971, 'The Theory and Practice of Time Travel', in All the Myriad Ways, Del Rey, New York, pp. 110–123.Google Scholar
  21. Parfit, D.: 1984, Reasons and Persons, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  22. Price, H.: 1996, Time's Arrow and Archimedes' Point, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Riggs, P.: 1997, 'The Principal Paradox of Time Travel', Ratio 10, 48–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Riggs, P.: 1991, 'A Critique of Mellor's Argument against 'Backwards' Causation', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42, 75–86.Google Scholar
  25. Smith, N. J. J.: 1997, 'Bananas Enough for Time Travel?', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48, 363–389.Google Scholar
  26. Townsend, Aubrey, 'Time Travel, Freedom and Deliberation', inA. Townsend (ed.), Time, Self and Freedom, Monash University, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  27. Wheeler, J. and R. Feynman: 1949, 'Classical Electro-Dynamics in Terms of Direct Interparticle Action', Reviews of Modern Physics 21, 425–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Hanley

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations