Social Psychology of Education

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 211–228 | Cite as

Understanding Choice Behaviours: Pathways from School to University with Changing Aspirations and Opportunities

  • Laurel Bornholt
  • Jill Gientzotis
  • George Cooney


A socio-ecological approach to explain choice behaviour highlights salient personal and social factors in the context of changing aspirations and opportunities. The population databases are five cohorts of all school leaver applicants for university places in a state of Australia and a survey for one cohort. Results highlight common behaviour patterns across cohorts, with diverse outcomes for specific social groups. Offers of university places relate course preferences and school achievement. In addition, decisions to apply, accept and enrol vary with social experience by socio-economic indicators, geographic location and school type. Student explanations for their decisions to defer or let the offer lapse entail particular social factors as well as personal factors of self concepts, interests and financial needs. Findings contribute to a better understanding of choice behaviour, with a general model of the personal and social factors that explain diverse pathways to higher education.


High Education Social Factor Behaviour Pattern Personal Factor Social Experience 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ainley, J., Foreman, J., & Sheret, M. (1991). High school factors that influence students to remain in school. Journal of Educational Research, 85, 69–80.Google Scholar
  2. ANTA Australian National Training Authority (1999). National report of the Australian vocational education and training system(Vol. 3). Brisbane: Australian National Training Authority.Google Scholar
  3. Australian Bureau of Statistics (1998). Socio-economic index for areas. Canberra: ABS.Google Scholar
  4. AVCC Australian Vice Chancellors Committee (1991). Unmet undergraduate student demand in higher education institutions. Canberra: AVCC.Google Scholar
  5. Ball, S.J., Davies, J., David, J., & Reay, D. (2002). Decisions, differentiations and distinctions: towards a sociology of choice of higher education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23, 51–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baumert, J. & Köller, O. (2000). National and international school performance studies: what can they do? What are their Limits? European Education, 32, 37–49.Google Scholar
  7. Bornholt, L.J. (2000). Social and personal aspects of self knowledge: a balance of individuality and belonging, learning & instruction, 10, 415–429.Google Scholar
  8. Bornholt, L.J. (2001). Self-concepts, usefulness and behavioural intentions in the social context of schooling. Educational Psychology, 21, 67–78.Google Scholar
  9. Bornholt, L.J. & Möller, J. (2003). Attributions about achievement and intentions about further study in social context. Social Psychology of Education, 6, 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bowes, J. & Hayes, A. (Eds.) (1999). Children, families and communities: contexts and consequences. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Brooks, R. (2002). 'Edinburgh, Exeter, East London or employment?': a review of research on young people's higher education choices, Educational Research, 44, 217–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (1998). Education policy analysis. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  13. DEET Department of Employment Education and Training (1993). National report on Australia's higher education sector. Canberra: AGPS.Google Scholar
  14. Goldstein, H. (1997). Methods in school effectiveness research. School Effectiveness & School Improvement, 8, 369–395.Google Scholar
  15. Hall, R. (2000). The first year experience at University. Sydney: Faculties of Arts and Social Sciences and Science and Technology, University of New South Wales.Google Scholar
  16. Hesketh, B. (1998). Careers advice and tertiary decision-making 'downunder' in Australia. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 52, 396–408.Google Scholar
  17. Hoffman, L., Krapp, A., Renniger, K.A., & Baumert, J. (1998). Interest and learning. Proceedings of Seeon Conference on Interest and Gender. Kiel: Germany.Google Scholar
  18. James, R. (2001). How school-leavers choose a preferred university course and possible effects on the quality of the school-university transition. Journal of Institutional Research, 78–88.Google Scholar
  19. Jimenez, J. & Salas-Velasco, M. (2000). Modelling educational choices. A binomial logit model applied to higher education. Higher Education, 40, 293–311.Google Scholar
  20. Long, M. (1992). Urban and rural participation, higher education series. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Training.Google Scholar
  21. McDonald, R.P., Parker, P.M., & Ishizuka, T. (1993). A scale invariant treatment of recursive path models. Psychometrika, 58, 431–443.Google Scholar
  22. MCEETYA Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (2000). Task force on rural and remote education, training, employment and children's services: national framework for rural and remote education. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service.Google Scholar
  23. Need, A. & de Jong, U. (2001). Educational differentials in the Netherlands. Rationality & Society, 13, 71–98.Google Scholar
  24. OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2001). OECD economic studies. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  25. Oppenheimer, L. (1991). The concept of action: a historical perspective. In L. Oppenheimer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The origins of action. Interdisciplinary and international perspectives. New York: Springer Verlag; pp. 1–36.Google Scholar
  26. Parker, P.M., Bornholt, L.J., & Cooney, G.H. (1994). Transition from school to university in NSW. Report to the Australian Government Department of Education, Employment and Training. Canberra.Google Scholar
  27. Paterson, L. (1992). The influence of opportunity on aspirations among prospective university entrants from Scottish schools, 1970-88. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 155, 37–60.Google Scholar
  28. PMYPAPT Prime Ministers Youth Pathways Action Plan Taskforce (2001). Footprints to the future. Summary report of the Prime Minister's Youth Pathways Action Plan Taskforce. Canberra: AusInfo.Google Scholar
  29. Reay, D. (2002). Class, authenticity and the transition to higher education for mature students. Sociological Review, 50, 398–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Reay, D., Davies, J., David, M., & Ball, S.J. (2001). Choices of degree or degrees of choice? Class, 'race' and the higher educations choice process. Sociology, 35, 855–874.Google Scholar
  31. Robertson, C. (1993). Participation in post-compulsory education in Scotland. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 156, 423–442.Google Scholar
  32. Robinson, R. (2004). Pathways to completion: patterns of progression through a university degree. Higher Education, 47, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Valsiner, J. (1998). The guided mind. Massachusetts, USA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Valsiner, L. & Lawrence, J.A. (1996). Human development in culture across the life span. In J.W. Berry & P.R. Dasen (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 2): Basic processes and human development. pp. 71–106.Google Scholar
  35. Williams T., Long, M., Carpenter, P., & Hayden, M. (1993). Entering higher education in the 1990s Department of Employment, Education and Training. AGPS, Canberra.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laurel Bornholt
    • 1
  • Jill Gientzotis
    • 1
  • George Cooney
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Development and Learning, Building A35University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations