Studies in Philosophy and Education

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 265–281 | Cite as

Technological Metaphors and Moral Education: The Hacker Ethic and the Computational Experience

  • Bryan R. Warnick


This essay is an attempt to understand how technological metaphors, particularly computer metaphors, are relevant to moral education. After discussing various types of technological metaphors, it is argued that technological metaphors enter moral thought through their “functional descriptions.” The computer metaphor is then explored by turning to the “hacker ethic.” Analysis of this ethic reveals parallels between the experience of computer programming and the moral standards of those who are enmeshed in computer technology. This parallel suggests that the hacker ethic is being pushed by a computer metaphor and its functional descriptions in a direction of individualism and systems thinking. After examining some possible implications of the computer metaphor, this essay offers suggestions concerning how technological metaphors may be critiqued.

conceptual metaphor theory ethics metaphor moral education technology value theory 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bowers, C.A. (2000). Let them eat data: How computers affect education, cultural diversity, and the prospects of ecological sustainability. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  2. Baudrillard, J. (1983). Simulations. New York: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
  3. Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology and other essays. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  4. Himanen, P. (2001). The hacker ethic and the spirit of the information age. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  5. Hughs, E. (1993). A cyberpunk's manifesto. Retrieved January 24, 1999, from: Ftp:// Scholar
  6. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Lewis, C.S. (1939). Bluspels and flalansferes. In Rehabilitations and other essays (pp. 135–158). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue. South Bend, IN: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Mey, J.L. (2000). The computer as prosthesis: Reflections on the use of a metaphor. Hermes, Journal of Linguistics, 24, 15-30.Google Scholar
  10. Postman, N. (1992). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  11. Powell, B.B. (2001). Classical myth. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  12. Säljö, R. (2002). My brain's running slow today-The preference for “things ontologies” in research and everyday discourse about human thinking. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 21(4-5), 389–405.Google Scholar
  13. Sheppard, S. (2001). Does mind matter? Education and conceptions of mind. Educational Theory, 51(2), 243-258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Siegfried, T. (2000). The bit and the pendulum: From quantum computing to m theory-the new physics of information. New York: Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated.Google Scholar
  15. Stoll, C. (1999). High-tech heretic. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  16. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  17. Weizenbaum, J. (1976). Computer power and human reason: From judgment to calculation. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  18. Yanov, D. (1996). Ecologies of technological metaphors and the theme of control. Techné: Journal of the Society for Philosophy and Technology, 1(3-4). ejournals/SPT/v1n3n4/Yanow.htmlGoogle Scholar
  19. Yob, I.M. (2003). Thinking constructively with metaphors. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 22, 127-138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bryan R. Warnick
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Educational Policy StudiesUniversity of IllinoisChampaignUSA

Personalised recommendations