Solar System Research

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 66–75 | Cite as

Determination of Large Asteroid Masses by the Dynamical Method

  • O. M. Kochetova


Masses of 19 asteroids have been determined from the analysis of their gravitational effect on the motion of perturbed bodies. The following asteroids were selected as perturbed bodies: (1) those which had single close encounters with the perturbing asteroid; (2) those whose mean motion was in a 1 : 1 commensurability with that of the perturber and which had close or moderate recurrent encounters with the perturber. The perturber mass was determined from observations of several tens of perturbed asteroids that were selected from these two groups. The selection criterion was the error of the mass determined from observations of only one asteroid. Positional observations of the asteroids on the interval 1900–2002 were used. The masses were determined with errors by an order-half an order of magnitude smaller than the masses found. The results are compared with those of other authors.


Selection Criterion Gravitational Effect Close Encounter Positional Observation Large Asteroid 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Herget, P., Outer Satellites of Jupiter,Astron. J., 1968, vol. 73,no. 8, pp. 737-742.Google Scholar
  2. Hilton, J.L., Seidelman, P.K., and Middour, J., Prospects for Determining Asteroid Masses,Astron. J., 1996, vol. 112,no. 5, pp. 2319-2329.Google Scholar
  3. Hilton, J.L., Asteroid Masses and Densities,Asteroids III, Bottke, W., Cellino, A., Paolicchi, P., and Binzel, R.P, Eds., Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press, 2003, pp. 103-112.Google Scholar
  4. Hoffmann, M., Asteroid Mass Determination: Present Situation and Perspectives,Asteroids II, Binzel, R.P., Gehrels, T., and Matthews, M.S., Eds., Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press, 1989, pp. 228-239.Google Scholar
  5. Kochetova, O., and Chernetenko, Yu., Determination of Mass of Jupiter and That of Some Minor Planets From Observations of Minor Planets Moving in 2: 1 Commensurability with Jupiter,Dynamics of Natural and Artificial Celestial Bodies, Pretka-Ziomek, H., Wnuk, E., Seidelmann, P.K., and Richardson, P., Eds., Dordrecht: Kluwer Acad., 2001, pp. 333-334.Google Scholar
  6. Kochetova, O.M., The Influence of Motion Model and Observational Errors on the Accuracy of Determining Orbital Parameters of Minor Planets,Tr. IPA RAN, 2000, no. 5, pp. 197-203.Google Scholar
  7. Krasinsky, G.A., Pitjeva, E.V., Vasilyev, M.V., and Yagudina, E.I., Estimating Masses of Asteroids,Soobshch. IPA RAN, 2001, no. 139.Google Scholar
  8. Krasinsky, G.A., Pitjeva, E.V., Vasilyev, M.V., and Yagudina, E.I., Hidden Mass in the Asteroid Belt,Icarus, 2002, no. 158, pp. 98-105.Google Scholar
  9. Kuznetsov, V.B., Catalog of Asteroid Encounters,Soobshch. IPA RAN, 2000, no. 136.Google Scholar
  10. Kuznetsov, V.B., Determination of Masses of 108 Asteroids,Soobshch. IPA RAN, 2001, no. 138.Google Scholar
  11. Lupishko, D.F., Shevchenko, V.G., and Tungalag, N., Influence of Scattering Law on the Asteroid Photocentre Position, inExtension and Connection of Reference Frames Using Ground Based CCD TechniquePinigin, G.I., Ed.,Proc. Int. Astron. Conf., Nikolaev (Ukraine), 2001, pp. 133-138.Google Scholar
  12. Lupishko, D.F., Improved IRAS Albedos and Diameters of Asteroids,Astron. Vestn., 1998, vol. 32,no. 2, pp. 141-146 [Sol. Syst. Res.(Engl. Transl.), vol. 32, no. 2, p. 122].Google Scholar
  13. Michalak, G., Determination of Asteroid Masses II. (6) Hebe, (10) Hygiea, (15) Eunomia, (52) Europa, (88) Thisbe, (444) Gyptis, (511) Davida, and (704) Interamnia,Astron. Astrophys., 2001, vol. 374, pp. 703-711.Google Scholar
  14. Millis, R.L., Wasserman, O.G., Franz, N.M.,et al., The Diameter of 88 Thisbe From Its Occultation of SAO 187124,Astron. J., 1983, vol. 88,no. 2, pp. 229-235.Google Scholar
  15. Shor, V.A., Ed.,Efemeridy malykh planet na 2003 god(Ephemerides of Minor Planets for 2003), St. Petersburg: IPA Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2002.Google Scholar
  16. Standish, E.M., Newhall, X.X., Williams, J.G., and Folkner, W.F., JPL Planetary and Lunar Ephemerides, DE403/LE403,JPL Interoffice Memorandum, 1995, no. 314.10-127, pp. 1-22.Google Scholar
  17. Tedesco, E.F., Asteroid Magnitudes, UBV Colors, and IRAS Albedos and Diameters,Asteroids II, Binzel, R.P., Gehrels, T., and Matthews, M.S., Eds., Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press, 1989, pp. 1090-1138.Google Scholar
  18. Tedesco, E.F. and Veeder, G.I., IMPS Albedos and Diameters Catalog (FP102),The IRAS Planet Survey, Tedesco, E.F.,et al., Eds., Phillips Lab., 1992, pp. 243-285.Google Scholar
  19. Tholen, D.J., Asteroid Taxonomic Classifications,Asteroids II, Binzel, R.P., Gehrels, T., and Matthews, M.S., Eds., Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press, 1989, pp. 1139-1150.Google Scholar
  20. Yeomans, D.K., Barriot, J.-P., Dunham, D.W.,et al., Estimating the Mass of Asteroid 253 Mathilde From Tracking Data during the NEAR Flyby,Science, 1997, vol. 278, pp. 2106-2109.Google Scholar
  21. Yeomans, D.K., Antreasian, P.G., Cheng, A.,et al., Estimating the Mass of Asteroid 433 Eros during NEAR Spacecraft Flyby,Science, 1999, vol. 285, pp. 560-561.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© MAIK “Nauka/Interperiodica” 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. M. Kochetova
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Applied AstronomyRussian Academy of SciencesSt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations