Advertisement

Sociological Forum

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 545–576 | Cite as

The Personal Is Scientific, the Scientific Is Political: The Public Paradigm of the Environmental Breast Cancer Movement

  • Sabrina McCormick
  • Phil Brown
  • Stephen Zavestoski
Article

Abstract

This paper introduces the concept of “boundary movements” to characterize the distinctive growth and strategies of movements involving citizen/science alliances to contend with environmentally related illnesses. This concept is applied to a case study of the environmental breast cancer movement, which has induced changes in treatment options and public perception of breast cancer. Since the early 1990s, a segment of this movement has consistently criticized the traditional paradigms governing research, the epistemology of breast cancer, and popular understandings. Against the traditional focus on genetics, lifestyles, and personal responsibility, this segment's broader messages stress environmental causation and women's participation in science and politics.

social movements environment health boundary movement 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anglin, Mary K. 1997 “Working from the inside out: Implications of breast cancer activism for biomedical policies and practices.” Social Science and Medicine 44:1403-1415.Google Scholar
  2. American Cancer Society 2002 Cancer Facts and Figures 2002. Washington, DC: American Cancer Society.Google Scholar
  3. Aschengrau, A., D. Ozonoff, R. Vezina, T. Heeren, and Y. Zhang 1996 “Cancer risk and residential proximity to cranberry bog cultivation in Massachusetts.” American Journal of Public Health 86:1289-1296.Google Scholar
  4. Brenner, Barbara 2000 “The breast cancer epidemic.” Presentation at American Public Health Association Conference, Boston, MA, November 13.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, Phil, Stephen Zavestoski, Sabrina McCormick, Brian Mayer, Rachel Morello-Frosch, and Rebecca Gasior 2002 “Health social movements: Uncharted territory in social movement research.” Presentation at ASA Collective Behavior and Social Movements Section conference, Notre Dame, IN, August 15.Google Scholar
  6. Clarke, Adele 2001 “Negotiating new relationships again and again: U.S. women's health movements and (bio)medicine.” Presentation at Annual Meeting of Society for the Social Study of Science, Cambridge, MA, November.Google Scholar
  7. Clarke, Adele E., Jennifer R. Fishman, Jennifer Ruth Fosket, Laura Mamo, and Janet K. Shim 2000 “Technoscience and the new biomedicalization: Western roots, global rhizomes.” Sciences Sociales et Santé 18(2):11-42.Google Scholar
  8. Davis, Devra Lee, and H. Leon Bradlow 1995 “Can environmental estrogens cause breast cancer?” Scientific American October:166-172.Google Scholar
  9. Dickersin, Kay, Lundy Braun, Margaret Mead, Robert Millikan, Anna Wu, Jennifer Pietenpol, Susan Troyan, Benjamin Anderson, and Frances Visco 2001 “Development and implementation of a science training course for breast cancer activists: Project LEAD (leadership, education and advocacy development).” Health Expectations 4:213-220.Google Scholar
  10. Dorgan J., John Brock, Nathaniel Rothman, Larry Needham, and Rosetta Miller 1999 “Serum organochlorine pesticides and PCBs and breast cancer risk: Results from a prospective analysis.” Cancer Causes and Control 10:1-11.Google Scholar
  11. Epstein, Steven 1998 Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  12. Epstein, Steven 2001 “U.S. AIDS activism and the question of epistemological radicalism.” Presentation at Annual Meeting of Society for the Social Study of Science, Cambridge, MA, November.Google Scholar
  13. Ferguson, Susan J., and Anne S. Kasper 2000 “Living with breast cancer.” In Anne S. Kasper and Susan J. Ferguson (eds.), Breast Cancer: Society Shapes an Epidemic: 5-22. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
  14. Fishman, Jennifer 2000 “Assessing breast cancer: Risk, science and environmental activism in an 'at risk' community.” In Laura K. Potts (ed.), Ideologies of Breast Cancer: Feminist Perspectives: 181-204. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
  15. Guttes, S., K. Failing, K. Neumann, J. Kleinstein, S. Georgii, and H. Brunn 1998 “Chlororganic pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls in breast tissue of women with benign and malignant breast disease.” Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 35(1):140-147.Google Scholar
  16. Hoyer, A. P., T. Jorgensen, J. W. Brock, and P. Grandjean 2000 “Organochlorine exposure and breast cancer survival.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 53(3):323-330.Google Scholar
  17. Hunter, David and Karl T. Kelsey 1993 “Pesticide Residues and Breast Cancer: The Harvest of the Silent Spring?” Journal of the National Cancer Institute.Google Scholar
  18. Hunter, David J., Susan Hankinson, Francine Laden, Graham Colditz, Joanne Manson, Walter Willett, Frank Speizer, and Mary S. Wolff 1997 “Plasma organochlorine levels and the risk of breast cancer.” New England Journal of Medicine 337:1253-1258.Google Scholar
  19. Kant, A. K., A. Schatzkin, B. I. Graubard, and C. Schairer 2000 “A prospective study of diet quality and mortality in women.” Journal of the American Medical Association 283(16):2109-2115.Google Scholar
  20. Klawiter, Maren 1999 “Racing for the cure, walking women, and toxic touring: Mapping cultures of action within the Bay Area terrain of breast cancer.” Social Problems 29(3):104-127.Google Scholar
  21. Klawiter, Maren 2001 “Breast cancer activism in the U.S.: Diverse perspectives.” Presentation at Annual Meeting of Society for the Social Study of Science, Cambridge, MA, November.Google Scholar
  22. Krimsky, Sheldon 2000 Hormonal Chaos: The Scientific and Social Origins of the Endocrine Disrupter Hypothesis. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Laraña, E., H. Johnston, and J. R. Gusfield 1994 New Social Movements: From Ideology to Identity. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Lichtenstein, P., N. Holm, P. K. Verkasalo, A. Iliadou, J. Kaprio, M. Koskenvuo, E. Pukkala, A. Skytthe, and K. Hemminki 2000 “Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer—Analyses of cohorts of twins from Sweden, Denmark, and Finland.” New England Journal of Medicine: 343:78-85.Google Scholar
  25. Meyer, David, and Nancy Whittier 1994 “Social movement spillover.” Social Problems 41:277-298.Google Scholar
  26. Myhre, Jennifer 2001 “Contemporary breast cancer activism in the United States.” Presentation at Annual Meeting of Society for the Social Study of Science, Cambridge, MA, November.Google Scholar
  27. Raffensperger, Carolyn, and Joel Tickner (eds.) 1999 Protecting Public Health and the Environment: Implementing the Precautionary Principle. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  28. Ray, Raka 1999 Fields of Protest: Women's Movements in India. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  29. Reiss, Joan Reinhardt, and Andrea Ravinett Martin 2000 “Breast cancer 2000: An update on the facts, figures and issues.” San Francisco: The Breast Cancer Fund.Google Scholar
  30. Robbins, Anthony S., Sonia Brescianni, and Jennifer Kelsey 1997 “Regional differences in known risk factors and the higher incidence of breast cancer in San Francisco.” Journal of the National Cancer Institute 89:960-964.Google Scholar
  31. Ruzek, Sheryl Burt, Virginia L. Olesen, and Adele Clarke (eds.) 1997 Women's Health: Complexities and Differences. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Silent Spring Institute 1998 The Cape Cod Breast Cancer and Environment Study: Results of the First Three Years of Study. Newton, MA: Silent Spring Institute.Google Scholar
  33. Star, Susan Leigh, and James R. Griesemer 1989 “Institutional ecology, 'translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39.” Social Studies of Science 19:1907-1939.Google Scholar
  34. Thompson, H. J. 1992 “Effect of amount and type of exercise on experimentally induced breast cancer.” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 322:61-71.Google Scholar
  35. Weisman, Carol S. 1998 Women's Health Care: Activist Traditions and Institutional Change. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  36. West, Dee W., Sally Glaser, and Angela Witt Prehn 1998 Status of Breast Cancer Research in the San Francisco Bay Area. Union City, CA. Northern California Cancer Center.Google Scholar
  37. Wolff, Mary S., Paolo G. Toniolo, Eric W. Lee, Marilyn Rivera, and Neil Dublin 1993 “Blood levels of organochlorine residues and risk of breast cancer.” Journal of the National Cancer Institute 85:648-652.Google Scholar
  38. Zones, Jane S. 2000 “Profits from pain: The political economy of breast cancer.” In Anne S. Kasper and Susan J. Ferguson (eds.), Breast Cancer: Society Shapes an Epidemic: 119-51. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sabrina McCormick
    • 1
  • Phil Brown
    • 1
  • Stephen Zavestoski
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SociologyBrown UniversityProvidence
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUniversity of San FranciscoSan Francisco

Personalised recommendations