Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 50, Issue 11–12, pp 781–794 | Cite as

The “Best Actress” Paradox: Outstanding Feature Films Versus Exceptional Women's Performances

  • Dean Keith Simonton
Article

Abstract

On the basis of prior research on acting careers, it was hypothesized that exceptional women's performances are less likely to be associated with outstanding feature films than is the case for men. This hypothesis was tested in 2 studies. In Study 1, 2,157 films that received Oscar nominations or awards between 1936 and 2000 were examined, whereas in Study 2, I scrutinized 1,367 films that received awards or award nominations from 7 major professional, journalistic, and critical associations from 1968 to 2000. In both studies, a significant gender discrepancy was found, a differential that persisted after the introduction of a large number of statistical controls and that showed no tendency to diminish over time. The results are discussed in terms of possible explanations and directions for future research.

film acting awards gender differences 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Academy Awards Database. (n.d.). Retrieved http://www.oscars.org/awards db/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
  2. American Heritage electronic dictionary (3rd ed.). (1992). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  3. Bazzini, D.G., McIntosh, W. D., Smith, S. M., Cook, S., & Harris, C. (1997). The aging women in popular film: Underrepresented, unattractive, unfriendly, and unintelligent. Sex Roles, 36, 531-543.Google Scholar
  4. Bleiler, D. (Ed.). (2001). TLA film and video guide: The discerning film lover's guide 2002–2003. New York: St. Martin's/Griffin.Google Scholar
  5. Boor, M. (1990). Reliability of ratings of movies by professional movie critics. Psychological Reports, 67, 243-257.Google Scholar
  6. Boor, M. (1992). Relationships among ratings of motion pictures by viewers and six professional movie critics. Psychological Reports, 70, 1011-1021.Google Scholar
  7. Buss, D. M. (1994). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  8. Corel All-Movie Guide 2 CD-ROM. (1996). Ottawa, Canada: Corel Corporation.Google Scholar
  9. Craddock, J. (Ed.). (2002). Video Hound's golden movie retriever 2002. Boston: Visible Ink.Google Scholar
  10. E! Online. (2003). Retrieved March 26, 2003, from http://www.eonline.com/Features/Features/Salaries/index2.htmlGoogle Scholar
  11. Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408-423.Google Scholar
  12. Gilberg, M., & Hines, T. (2000). Male entertainment award winners are older than female winners. Psychological Reports, 86, 175-178.Google Scholar
  13. Harvey, J. (1953). The content characteristics of best-selling novels. Public Opinion Quarterly, 17, 91-114.Google Scholar
  14. Haskell, M. (1987). From reverence to rape: The treatment of women in the movies (2nd ed.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hedley, M. (2002). The geometry of gendered conflict in popular film: 1986–2000. Sex Roles, 47, 201-217.Google Scholar
  16. Hollywood Foreign Press Association. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.hfpa.com/awardsframe.htmGoogle Scholar
  17. Internet Movie Database. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://us.imdb.com/Sections/Awards/Google Scholar
  18. Lehman, H. C. (1941). The chronological ages of some recipients of large annual incomes. Social Forces, 20, 196-206.Google Scholar
  19. Litman, B. R. (1983). Predicting success of theatrical movies: An empirical study. Journal of Popular Culture, 16, 159-175.Google Scholar
  20. Litman, B. R., & Kohl, L. S. (1989). Predicting financial success of motion pictures: The '80s experience. Journal of Media Economics, 2, 35-50.Google Scholar
  21. Maltin, L. (Ed.). (2002). Leonard Maltin's 2003 movie & video guide. New York: Signet.Google Scholar
  22. Markson, E. W., & Taylor, C. A. (1993). Real versus reel world: Older women and the Academy Awards. Women and Therapy, 14, 157-172.Google Scholar
  23. Martin, M., & Porter, M. (2002). Video movie guide 2003. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
  24. Millburn, M. A., Mather, R., & Conrad, S. D. (2000). The effects of viewing R-rated movie scenes that objectify women on perceptions of date rape. Sex Roles, 43, 645-664.Google Scholar
  25. Miller, D., & Shamsie, J. (1999). Strategic responses to three kinds of uncertainty: Product line simplicity at the Hollywood film studios. Journal of Management, 25, 97-116.Google Scholar
  26. Peary, D. (1993). Alternate Oscars: One critic's defiant choices for best picture, actor, and actress from 1927 to the present. New York: Delta.Google Scholar
  27. Prag, J., & Casavant, J. (1994). An empirical study of the determinants of revenues and marketing expenditures in the motion picture industry. Journal of Cultural Economics, 18, 217-235.Google Scholar
  28. Rosen, M. (1973). Popcorn Venus: Women, movies and the American dream. New York: Coward, McCann & Geoghegan.Google Scholar
  29. Signorielli, N., & Bacue, A. (1999). Recognition and respect: A content analysis of prime-television characters across three decades. Sex Roles, 40, 527-544.Google Scholar
  30. Simonton, D. K. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  31. Simonton, D. K. (1998). Fickle fashion versus immortal fame: Transhistorical assessments of creative products in the opera house. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 198-210.Google Scholar
  32. Simonton, D. K. (1999). Significant samples: The psychological study of eminent individuals. Psychological Methods, 4, 425-451.Google Scholar
  33. Simonton, D. K. (2002). Collaborative aesthetics in the feature film: Cinematic components predicting the differential impact of 2,323 Oscar-nominated movies. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 20, 115-125.Google Scholar
  34. Simonton, D. K. (in press-a). Cinematic creativity and production budgets: Does money make the movie? Creativity Research Journal.Google Scholar
  35. Simonton, D. K. (in press-b). Film awards as indicators of cinematic creativity and achievement: A quantitative comparison of the Oscars and six alternatives. Creativity Research Journal.Google Scholar
  36. Simonton, D. K. (in press-c). Group artistic creativity: Creative clusters and cinematic success in 1,327 feature films. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.Google Scholar
  37. Smith, S. P., & Smith, V. K. (1986). Successful movies: A preliminary empirical analysis. Applied Economics, 18, 501-507.Google Scholar
  38. Walker, J. (Ed.). (2001). Halliwell's film & video guide 2002. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  39. Wallace, W. T., Seigerman, A., & Holbrook, M. B. (1993). The role of actors and actresses in the success of films: How much is a movie star worth? Journal of Cultural Economics, 17, 1-27.Google Scholar
  40. Webb, R. M., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2002). Mathematically facile adolescents with math-science aspirations: New perspectives on their educational and vocational development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 785-794.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of CaliforniaDavis

Personalised recommendations