Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 50, Issue 9–10, pp 605–621 | Cite as

A Quest for Authenticity: Contemporary Butch Gender

  • Heidi M. Levitt
  • Katherine R. Hiestand
Article

Abstract

A model of contemporary butch identity has been constructed from the analysis of a series of semistructured interviews with butch-identified women who described their gender in relation to their own experiences and beliefs. The analytic process entailed a grounded theory approach (Glaser & Strauss, 1967). The results of the study describe how butch-identified women conceptualize their gender identity and how it affects their social relations within lesbian and heterosexual communities. The core category in this model (i.e., A Quest for Authenticity) frames butch identity as entailing an ongoing process of negotiation between an essential sense of lesbian gender and gender presentation demands that are understood in relation to the signification and meaning of genders across social contexts.

butch lesbian transgender homosexual gender 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

references

  1. Bailey, J. M., Kim, P., Hills, A., & Linsenmeier, J. A. W. (1997). Butch, femme, or straight-acting? Partner preferences of gay men and lesbians. Journal of Personality and Social Psycho-logy, 73, 960-973.Google Scholar
  2. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155-162.Google Scholar
  3. Bess, J. A., & Firestein, B. (2001, March). Gender variance symposium. Symposium presented at the meeting of the Association of Women in Psychology, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
  4. Burana, L., & Due, L. R. (Eds.). (1994). Dagger: On butch women. San Francisco: Cleis Press.Google Scholar
  5. Butler, J. (1990/1999). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Butler, J. (1991). Imitation and gender insubordination. In D. Fuss (Ed.), Inside/out: Lesbian theories, gay theories (pp. 13-31). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Butler, J. (1998). Afterword. In S. Munt (Ed.), Butch/femme: Inside lesbian gender (pp. 225-230). Washington, DC: Cassell.Google Scholar
  8. Faderman, L. (1991). Odd girls and twilight lovers: A history of lesbian life in twentieth century America. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Feinberg, L. (1993). Stone butch blues: A novel. Ithaca, NY: Firebrand Books.Google Scholar
  10. Feinberg, L. (1996). Transgender warriors: Making history from Joan of Arc to Dennis Rodman. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  11. Giorgi, A. (1970). Psychology as a human science: A phenomenological approach. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  12. Glaser, B. J., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
  13. Greenberg, A. S., & Bailey, J. M. (1993). Do biological explanations of homosexuality have moral, legal, or policy implications? Journal of Sex Research, 30, 245-251.Google Scholar
  14. Halberstam, J. (1998a). Female masculinity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Halberstam, J. (1998b). Transgender butch: Butch/FTM border wars and the masculine continuum. Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 4, 287-310.Google Scholar
  16. Hale, C. J. (1998). Consumering the living: Dis(re)membering the dead in the butch/FTM borderlands. Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 4, 311-348.Google Scholar
  17. Harris, L., & Crocker, E. (1997). Femme: Feminsts, lesbians and bad girls. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Herek, G. (1995). Psychological heterosexism in the United States. In A. R. D'Augelli & C. J. Patterson (Eds.), Lesbian, gay, and bisexual identities over the lifespan: Psychological perspectives (pp. 321-346). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Irigaray, L. (1996). I love to you: A sketch for happiness within history (A. Martin, Trans.). New York: Routledge. (Original work published 1992)Google Scholar
  20. Kane, M. (Producer), & Coolidge, M. (Director). (2000). If these walls could talk 2 [Film]. (Available from Home Box Office Division of Time Warner Entertainment Company)Google Scholar
  21. Kitzinger, C. (1987). The social construction of lesbianism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Lapovsky-Kennedy, E., & Davis, M. D. (1993). Boots of leather, slippers of gold: The history of a lesbian community. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  23. Levitt, H., Gerrish, E., & Hiestand, K. (2003). The misunderstood gender: A model of modern femme identity. Sex Roles, 48, 99-113.Google Scholar
  24. Levitt, H. M., & Bigler, M. (2003). Facilitating lesbian gender exploration. In J. S. Whitman & C. J. Boyd (Eds.), The therapist's notebook for lesbian, gay, and bisexual clients (pp. 183-196). Bingham, NY: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  25. Levitt, H. M., & Horne, S. G. (2002). Explorations of lesbian-queer genders. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 6(2), 2-25.Google Scholar
  26. Lloyd, M. (1997). GI Joes in Barbie land: Recontexualizing the meaning of butch in twentieth-century lesbian culture. In B. Beemyn & L. Eliason (Eds.), The lesbian menace: Ideo-logy, identity and the representation of lesbian life (pp. 178-204). Amherst, MA: University of MassachusettsPress.Google Scholar
  27. Loulan, J. (1990). The lesbian erotic dance: Butch, femme, androgyny, and other rhythms. San Francisco: Spinsters Ink.Google Scholar
  28. Lynch, J. M., & Reilly, M. E. (1986). Role relationships: Lesbian perspectives. Journal of Homosexuality, 12(2), 2-53.Google Scholar
  29. Munt, S. (1998). Butch/femme: Inside lesbian gender. Washington, DC: Cassell.Google Scholar
  30. Nestle, J. (1992). The persistent desire. Boston: Alyson Publications.Google Scholar
  31. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Evaluation and research method (2rd nd.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Pearcey, S. M., Docherty, K. J., & Dabbs, J. M., Jr. (1996). Testosterone and sex role identification in lesbian couples. Physiology and Behavior, 60, 1033-1035.Google Scholar
  33. Rennie, D. L. (2000). Grounded theory methodology as methodical hermeneutics: Reconciling realism and relativism. Theory and Psychology, 10, 481-501.Google Scholar
  34. Rennie, D. L., Phillips, J. R., & Quartaro, G. K. (1988). Grounded theory: A promising approach to conceptualization in psycho-logy? Canadian Psychology, 29, 139-150.Google Scholar
  35. Singh, D., Vidaurri, M., Zambarano, R. J., & Dabbs, J. M., Jr. (1999). Lesbian erotic role identification: Behavioral, morphological, and hormonal correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 1035-1049.Google Scholar
  36. Smith, C. A., & Stillman, S. (2002). Butch/femme in the personal advertisements of lesbians. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 6, 45-61.Google Scholar
  37. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Strickland, B. R. (2002). A butch among the belles. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 6, 75-84.Google Scholar
  39. Unger, R. K., & Crawford, M. (1993). Sex and gender: The troubled relationship between terms and concepts. Psychological Science, 4, 122-124.Google Scholar
  40. Weber, J. C. (1996). Social class as a correlate of gender identity among lesbian women. Sex Roles, 35, 271-280.Google Scholar
  41. Weston, K. (1995). Guessing games. In K. Jay (Ed.), Dyke life: A celebration of the lesbian experience (pp. 221-256). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  42. Whitam, F. L., Daskalos, C., Sobolewski, C. G., & Padilla, P. (1998). The emergence of lesbian sexuality and identity cross-culturally: Brazil, Peru, the Philippines, and the United States. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 27, 31-56.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MemphisMemphis
  2. 2.University of MemphisMemphis

Personalised recommendations