Sex Roles

, Volume 50, Issue 7–8, pp 505–514

Sex and Punishment: An Examination of Sexual Consequences and the Sexual Double Standard in Teen Programming

  • Jennifer Stevens Aubrey
Article

Abstract

A content analysis was conducted to examine sexual consequences on teen programming. The sample consisted of prime-time television dramas that featured characters between the ages of 12 and 22 years. Two major goals guided the study. First, the types of sexual consequences in teen programming were investigated. Results showed that emotional and social consequences far outnumbered physical consequences. Second, the portrayal of the sexual double standard was investigated. Negative consequences were more common in scenes in which female characters initiated sexual activities than in scenes in which male characters initiated sexual activities. Implications for future content analyses and media-effects research are discussed.

sex adolescents television sexual stereotypes content analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

references

  1. Bandura, A. (1994). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In J. Bryant & D. Zillman (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 61-90). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  2. Bingham, R., & Crockett, L. J. (1996). Longitudinal adjustment patterns of boys and girls experiencing early, middle, and late sexual intercourse. Developmental Psychology, 32, 647-658.Google Scholar
  3. Carroll, J. L., Volk, K. D., & Hyde, J. S. (1985). Differences between males and females in motives for engaging in sexual intercourse. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14, 131-139.Google Scholar
  4. Carpenter, L. M. (1998). From girls into women: Scripts for sexuality and romance in Seventeen magazine, 1974–1994. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 158-168.Google Scholar
  5. Collins, J. (1998, October 26). The youth brigade. Time, pp. 88-90.Google Scholar
  6. Durham, M. G. (1998). Dilemmas of desire: Representations of adolescent sexuality in two teen magazines. Youth and Society, 29, 369-389.Google Scholar
  7. Fernandez-Collado, C. F., Greenberg, B. S., Korzenny, F., & Atkin, C. K. (1978). Sexual intimacy and drug use in TV series. Journal of Communication, 28 (3), 30-37.Google Scholar
  8. Franzblau, S., Sprafkin, J. N., & Rubinstein, E. A. (1977). Sex on TV: A content analysis. Journal of Communication, 27 (2), 164-170.Google Scholar
  9. Freeman, M. (2000, December 11). Peacock network cleans up during November sweeps. Electronic Media, p. 2.Google Scholar
  10. Glass, G. V., & Hopkins, K. D. (1996). Statistical methods in education and psychology (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  11. Greenberg, B. S., & Busselle, R. W. (1996). Soap operas and sexual activity: A decade later. Journal of Communication, 46 (4), 153-160.Google Scholar
  12. Greenberg, B. S., Stanley, C., Siemicki, M., Heeter, C., Soderman, A., & Linsangan, R. (1993). Sex content on soaps and prime-time television series most viewed by adolescents. In B. S. Greenberg, J. D. Brown, & NL Buerkel-Rothfuss (Eds.), Media, sex, and the adolescent (pp. 29-44). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  13. Huston, A. C., Wartella, E., & Donnerstein, E. (1998). Measuring the effects of sexual content in the media: A report to the Kaiser Family Foundation. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.Google Scholar
  14. Jessor, S. L., & Jessor, R. (1975). Transition from virginity to non-virginity among youth: A social–psychological study over time. Developmental Psychology, 11, 473-484.Google Scholar
  15. Keough, C. (2000, December 4). Weblets put a big dent in the ratings of major networks. Los Angeles Business Journal, p. 7.Google Scholar
  16. Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Kunkel, D., Biely, E., Eyal, K., Cope-Farrar, K., Donnerstein, E., & Fandrich, R. (2003). Sex on TV: A biennial report to the Kaiser Family Foundation. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.Google Scholar
  18. Kunkel, D., Cope, K. M., & Biely, E. (1999). Sexual messages on television: Comparing findings from three studies. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 230-236.Google Scholar
  19. Kunkel, K., Cope, K. M., & Colvin, C. (1996). Sexual messages on family hour television: Content and context. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.Google Scholar
  20. Kunkel, D., Cope-Farrar, K., Biely, E., Farinola, W. J. M., & Donnerstein, E. (2001). Sex on TV: A biennial report to the Kaiser Family Foundation. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.Google Scholar
  21. Levinson, R. A., Jaccard, J., & Beamer, L. (1995). Older adolescents' engagement in casual sex: Impact of risk perception and psychosocial motivations. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 24, 349-364.Google Scholar
  22. MacCorquodale, P. (1989). Gender and sexual behavior. In K McKinney & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Human sexuality: The societal and interpersonal context (pp. 91-112). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  23. Martin, K. A. (1996). Puberty, sexuality, and the self: Boys and girls at adolescence. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Muehlenhard, C. L. (1988). “Nice women” don't say yes and “real men” don't say no: How miscommunication and the double standard can cause sexual problems. Women and Therapy, 7(2/3), 95-108.Google Scholar
  25. Rathbum, E. A. (1999, July 5). Stations say the WB's worth it. Broadcasting and Cable, p. 6.Google Scholar
  26. Schvaneveldt, P. L., Miller, B. C., Berry, E. H., & Lee, T. R. (2001). Academic goals, achievement, and age at first sexual intercourse: Longitudinal, bi-directional influences. Adolescence, 36, 767-787.Google Scholar
  27. Smith, C. (1991). Sex and genre on prime time. Journal of Homosexuality, 21, 119-138.Google Scholar
  28. Sprafkin, J. N., & Silverman, L. T. (1981). Update: Physically intimate and sexual behavior on prime-time television. Journal of Communication, 31, 34-40.Google Scholar
  29. Tolman, D. L. (1994). Doing desire: Adolescent girls' struggles for/with sexuality. Gender and Society, 8, 324-342.Google Scholar
  30. Tolman, D. L. (1999). Female adolescent sexuality in relational context: Beyond sexual decision-making. In N. G. Johnson, M. C. Roberts, & J. Worell (Eds.), Beyond appearance: A new look at adolescent girls (pp. 227-246). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  31. Tubman, J. G., Windle, M., & Windle, R. C. (1996). Cumulative sexual intercourse patterns among middle adolescents: Problem behavior precursors and concurrent health risk behaviors. Journal of Adolescent Health, 18, 182-191.Google Scholar
  32. Truglio, R. T. (1998). Television as a sex educator. In K. Swan, C. Meskill, & S DeMaio (Eds.), Social learning from broadcast television (pp. 7-23). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  33. Ward, L. M. (1995). Talking about sex: Common themes about sexuality in prime-time television programs children and adolescents view most. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 24, 595-615.Google Scholar
  34. Wray, J., & Steele, J. R. (2002). Girls in print: Figuring out what it means to be a girl. In J. D. Brown, J. R. Steele, & K Walsh-Childers (Eds.), Sexual teens, sexual media: Investigating media's influence on adolescent sexuality (pp. 191-208). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer Stevens Aubrey
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Communication StudiesThe University of MichiganAnn Arbor

Personalised recommendations