Sex Roles

, Volume 50, Issue 1–2, pp 15–26 | Cite as

Thirty Years After the Discovery of Gender: Psychological Concepts and Measures of Masculinity

  • Andrew P. Smiler
Article

Abstract

Study of the construct of masculinity has undergone substantial change since the feminist critique of gender in the 1960–70s. This review focuses on constancies and changes within empirical psychological theories and measurement because measures represent masculinity and their underlying assumptions are often obscured. After a brief historical introduction, 5 distinct movements are identified by their assumptions. These movements discuss masculinity as a unipolar construct, an ideology, a source of strain, a socially constructed entity, and, most recently, as a blend of these different movements. The lack of developmental accounts of masculinity and the positioning of masculinity as an acontextual, superordinate organizing element of individual lives are also addressed. Concluding comments address the lack of influence by masculinity researchers on broader psychological thought.

masculinity critique measurement gender history 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

references

  1. Addis, M. E., & Mahalik, J. R. (2003). Men, masculinity, and the contexts of help seeking. American Psychologist, 58, 5-14.Google Scholar
  2. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
  3. Beere, C. A. (1990). Gender roles: A handbook of tests and measures. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58, 155-162.Google Scholar
  5. Bem, S. L. (1979). Theory and measurement of androgyny: A reply to the Pedhazur-Tetenbaum and Locksley-Colten critiques. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1047-1054.Google Scholar
  6. Bem, S. L. (1997). Gender schema theory and its implications for child development. In T. Roberts (Ed.), The Lanahan readings in the psychology of women (pp. 539-552). Baltimore: Lanahan.Google Scholar
  7. Block, J. H. (1973). Conceptions of sex role: Some cross-cultural and longitudinal perspectives. American Psychologist, 58, 512-526.Google Scholar
  8. Block, J. H. (1984). Sex role identity and ego development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  9. Bohan, J. S. (1997). Regarding gender: Essentialism, constructionism and feminist psychology. In M. M. Gergen & S. N. Davis (Eds.), Toward a new psychology of gender (pp. 31-48). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Brannon, R. (1976). The male sex role: Our culture's blueprint for manhood and what it's done for us lately. In D. David & R. Brannon (Eds.), The forty-nine percent majority: The male sex role (pp. 1-48). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  11. Brannon, R., & Juni, S. (1984). A scale for measuring attitudes toward masculinity. Psychological Documents, 14, 6-7.Google Scholar
  12. Bunting, A. B., & Reeves, J. B. (1983). Perceived male sex orientation and beliefs about rape. Deviant Behavior, 58, 281-295.Google Scholar
  13. Buss, D. M. (1995). Psychological sex differences: Origins through sexual selection. American Psychologist, 58, 164-168.Google Scholar
  14. Connell, R. W. (1989). Making gendered people: Bodies, identities, sexualities. In M. M. Ferree, J. Lorber, & B. B. Hess (Eds.), Revisioning gender (pp. 449-472). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Connell, R. W. (1992). A very straight gay: Masculinity, homosexual experience, and the dynamics of gender. American Sociological Review, 58, 735-751.Google Scholar
  16. Connell, R. W. (1993). The big picture: Masculinities in recent world history. Theory and Society, 58, 597-623.Google Scholar
  17. Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Constantinople, A. (1973). Masculinity-femininity: An exception to a famous dictum? Psychological Bulletin, 58, 389-407.Google Scholar
  19. Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Deaux, K. (1984). From individual differences to social categories: Analysis of a decade's worth of research on gender. American Psychologist, 58, 105-116.Google Scholar
  21. Deaux, K., & LaFrance, M. (1998). Gender. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 788-827). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  22. Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 58, 369-389.Google Scholar
  23. Eagly, A. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  24. Eagly, A. (1995). The science and politics of comparing women and men. American Psychologist, 58, 145-158.Google Scholar
  25. Eisler, R. M. (1995). The relationship between masculine gender role stress and men's health risk: The validation of a construct. In R. F. Levant & W. S. Pollack (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 207-225). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  26. Eisler, R. M., & Skidmore, J. R. (1987). Masculine gender role stress: Scale development and component factors in the appraisal of stressful situations. Behavior Modification, 58, 123-136.Google Scholar
  27. Galambos, N. L., Almeida, D. M., & Petersen, A. C. (1990). Masculinity, femininity, and sex role attitudes in early adolescence: Exploring gender intensification. Child Development, 58, 1905-1914.Google Scholar
  28. Garbarino, J. (1999). Lost boys: Why our sons turn violent and how we can save them. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hare-Mustin, R. T., & Marecek, J. (1990). On making a difference. In R. T. Hare-Mustin & J. Marecek (Eds.), Making a difference: Psychology and the construction of gender (pp. 1-21). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Harris, A. C. (1995). African-American and Anglo-American gender identities: An empirical study. Journal of Black Psychology, 58, 182-194.Google Scholar
  31. Harter, S. (1990). Issues in the assessment of the self-concept of children and adolescents. In A. M. LaGreca (Ed.), Through the eyes of the child (pp. 292-325). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  32. Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1951). Manual for the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (Rev. ed.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota press.Google Scholar
  33. Herman, E. (1995). The romance of American psychology: Political culture in the age of experts. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hyde, J. S., & Plant, E. A. (1995). Magnitude of psychological gender differences. Another side to the story. American Psychologist, 50, 159-161.Google Scholar
  35. Kimmel, M. (1996). Manhood in America: A cultural history. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kimmel, M. S. (1997). Masculinity as homophobia: Fear, shame, and silence in the construction of gender identity. In M. M. Gergen & S. N. Davis (Eds.), Toward a new psychology of gender (pp. 223-242). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Klapp, O. E. (1962). Heroes, villains, and fools: Reflections of the American character. San Diego, CA: Aegis.Google Scholar
  38. Lenney, E. (1991). Sex roles: The measurement of masculinity, femininity, and androgyny. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of social psychological attitudes (Vol. 1, pp. 573-660). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  39. Levant, R. F. (1992). Toward the reconstruction of masculinity. Journal of Family Psychology, 58, 379-402.Google Scholar
  40. Levinson, D. J., Darrow, C. N., Klein, E. B., Levinson, M. H., & McKee, B. (1978). The seasons of a man's life. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  41. Liben, L. S., & Bigler, R. S. (2002). The developmental course of gender differentiation. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 67 (2, Serial No. 269).Google Scholar
  42. Lisak, D. (2000). Editorial. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 58, 3.Google Scholar
  43. Mahalik, J. R., Locke, B. D., Ludlow, L. H., Diemer, M. A., Scott, R. P. J., Gottfried, M., et al. (2003). Development of the conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory. Journal of Men and Masculinity, 58, 3-25.Google Scholar
  44. Malamuth, N. M., Addison, T., & Koss, M. (2000). Pornography and sexual aggression: Are there reliable effects and can we understand them? Annual Review of Sex Research, 58, 4-17.Google Scholar
  45. Marecek, J. (1995). Gender, politics, and psychology's ways of knowing. American Psychologist, 50, 162-163.Google Scholar
  46. Messner, M. A. (1992). Power at play: Sports and the problem of masculinity. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  47. Morawski, J. G. (1985). The measurement of masculinity and femininity: Engendering categorical realities. Journal of Personality, 58, 196-223.Google Scholar
  48. Morawski, J. G. (2001, November). Masculinity in crisis: Are there limits to gender? Paper presented at the University of New Hampshire, Durham.Google Scholar
  49. Mosher, D. L., & Sirkin, M. (1984). Measuring a macho personality constellation. Journal of Research in Personality, 58, 150-163.Google Scholar
  50. O'Neil, J. M. (2002, August). Twenty years of gender-role conflict research: Summary of 130 studies. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  51. O'Neil, J. M., Egan, J., Owen, S. V., & McBride, V. (1993). The Gender Role Journey measure: Scale development and psychometric evaluation. Sex Roles, 58, 167-185.Google Scholar
  52. O'Neil, J. M., Helms, B. J., Gable, R. K., David, L., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1986). Gender-Role Conflict Scale: College men's fear of femininity. Sex Roles, 58, 335-350.Google Scholar
  53. Overton, W. F., & Reese, H. W. (1981). Conceptual prerequisites for an understanding of stability-change and continuity-discontinuity. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 58, 99-123.Google Scholar
  54. Pleck, J. H. (1981). The myth of masculinity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  55. Pleck, J. H. (1987). The theory of male sex-role identity: Its rise and fall, 1936 to the present. In H. Brod (Ed.), The making of masculinities: The new men's studies (pp. 21-38). Boston: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  56. Pleck, J. H. (1995). The gender role strain paradigm: An update. In R. F. Levant & W. S. Pollack (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 11-32). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  57. Pleck, J. H., Sonenstein, F. L., & Ku, L. C. (1993). Attitudes toward male roles: A discriminant validity analysis. Sex Roles, 58, 481-501.Google Scholar
  58. Rose, N. (1996). Inventing our selves: Psychology, power and personhood. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Rotundo, E. A. (1993). American manhood: Transformations in masculinity from the revolution to the modern era. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  60. Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  61. Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Stapp, R. (1974). The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: A measure of sex role stereotypes and masculinity-femininity. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 4, 43-44.Google Scholar
  62. Stearns, P. N. (1994). American cool: Constructing a twentieth-century emotional style. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Strong, E. K. J. (1936). Interests of men and women. Journal of Social Psychology, 58, 49-67.Google Scholar
  64. Terman, L. M., & Miles, C. C. (1936). Sex and personality: Studies in masculinity and femininity. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  65. Thompson, E. H., Jr., & Pleck, J. H. (1995). Masculinity ideologies: A review of research instrumentation on men and masculinities. In R. F. Levant & W. S. Pollack (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 129-163). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  66. Townsend, K. (1996). Manhood at Harvard: William James and others. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Unger, R. K. (1990). Imperfect reflections of reality: Psychology constructs gender. In R. T. Hare-Mustin & J. Marecek (Eds.), Making a difference: Psychology and the construction of gender (pp. 102-149). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Villemez, W. J., & Touhey, J. C. (1977). A measure of individual differences in sex stereotyping and sex discrimination: The “Macho” scale. Psychological Reports, 58, 411-415.Google Scholar
  69. Wade, J. C. (1998). Male reference group identity dependence: A theory of male identity. Counseling Psychologist, 58, 349-383.Google Scholar
  70. Wade, J. C. (2001). Professional men's attitudes toward race and gender equity. Journal of Men's Studies, 58, 73-88.Google Scholar
  71. Wade, J. C., & Brittan-Powell, C. (2001). Men's attitudes toward race and gender equity: The importance of masculinity ideology, gender-related traits, and reference group identity dependence. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 58, 42-50.Google Scholar
  72. Wade, J. C., & Gelso, C. J. (1998). Reference Group Identity Dependence scale: A measure of male identity. Counseling Psychologist, 58, 384-412.Google Scholar
  73. Weisbuch, M., Beal, D., & O'Neal, E. C. (1999). How masculine ought I be? Men's masculinity and aggression. Sex Roles, 58, 583-592.Google Scholar
  74. Wetherell, M., & Edley, N. (1999). Negotiating hegemonic masculinity: Imaginary positions and psycho-discursive practices. Feminism and Psychology, 9, 335-356.Google Scholar
  75. Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990). Sex and psyche: Gender and self viewed cross-culturally. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew P. Smiler
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of New HampshireDurham

Personalised recommendations