Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 60, Issue 1, pp 93–120 | Cite as

Reward, persuasion, and the Sokal Hoax: A study in citation identities

  • Howard D. White
Article

Abstract

A citation identity is a list of an author's citees ranked by how frequently that author has cited them in publications covered by the Institute for Scientific Information. The same Dialog software that creates identities can simultaneously show the overall citation counts of citees, which indicate their reputations. Using identities for 28 authors in several disciplines of science and scholarship, I show that the reputational counts of their citees always have an approximately log-normal distribution: citations to very famous names are roughly balanced by citations to obscure ones, and most citations go to authors of middling reputation. These results undercut claims by constructivists that the main function of citation is to marshal “big-name” support for arguments at the expense of crediting lesser-known figures. The results are better explained by Robert K. Merton's norm of universalism, which holds that citers are rewarding use of relevant intellectual property, than by the constructivists' particularism, which holds that citers are trying to persuade through manipulative rhetoric. A universalistic citation pattern appears even in Alan Sokal's famous hoax article, where some of his citing was deliberately particularistic. In fact, Sokal's basic adherence to universalism probably helped his hoax succeed, which suggests the strength of the Mertonian norm. In specimen cases, the constructivists themselves are shown as conforming to it.

Keywords

Citation Analysis Citation Count Matthew Effect Cite Author Citation Identity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baldi, S. (1998), Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations: A networkanalytic model. American Sociological Review, 63: 829-846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bloor, D. (1976), Knowledge and Social Imagery. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  3. Brooks, T. A. (1984), Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36: 223-229.Google Scholar
  4. Brooks, T. A. (1986), Evidence of complex citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37: 34-36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, J. R. (2001), Who Rules in Science? An Opinionated Guide to the Wars. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cole, J. R., Cole, S. (1973), Social Stratification in Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cole, S. (1992), Making Science; Between Nature and Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cozzens, S. E. (1989), What do citations count? The rhetoric-first model. Scientometrics, 15: 437-447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cronin, B., Shaw, D. (2002), Identity-creators and image-makers: Using citation analysis and thick description to put authors in their place. Scientometrics, 54: 31-49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Edge, D. (1979), Quantitative measures of communication in science: A critical review. History of Science, 17: 103-134.Google Scholar
  11. Editors Of Lingua Franca. (2000), The Sokal Hoax; The Sham that Shook the Academy. Lingua Franca Books. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  12. Garfield, E., Pudovkin, A. I., Istomin, V. S. (2003), Why do we need algorithmic historiography? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54: 400-412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. s660_3954.htmlGoogle Scholar
  14. Gilbert, G. N. (1977), Referencing as persuasion. Social Studies of Science, 7: 113-122.Google Scholar
  15. Griffith, B. C. (1990), Understanding science: Studies of communication and information. In: C. L. Borgman (Ed.), Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. pp. 31-45.Google Scholar
  16. Hagstrom, W. O. (1965), The Scientific Community. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  17. Hess, D. J. (1997), Science Studies; An Advanced Introduction. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hoerman, H. L., Nowicke, C. E. (1995), Secondary and tertiary citing: A study of reference behavior in the literature of citation analysis deriving from the Ortega hypothesis of Cole and Cole. Library Quarterly, 65: 415-434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kaplan, N. (1965), The norms of citation behavior: Prolegomena to the footnote. American Documentation, 16: 179-184.Google Scholar
  20. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981), The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  21. Langham, T. (1995), Consistency in referencing. Journal of Documentation, 51: 360-369.Google Scholar
  22. Latour, B. (1987), Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Latour, B., Woolgar, S. (1979), Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Law, J., Williams, R. J. (1982), Putting facts together: A study in scientific persuasion. Social Studies of Science, 12: 535-558.Google Scholar
  25. Liu, M. (1993), The complexities of citation practice: A review of citation studies. Journal of Documentation, 49: 370-408.Google Scholar
  26. Lloyd, C. (1997), I was Michel Foucault's love slave. Salon. http://www.salon.com/feb97/loveslave970210.htmlGoogle Scholar
  27. Luukkonen, T. (1990), Citations in the Rhetorical, Reward, and Communication Systems of Science. PhD dissertation. Tampere, Finland: University of Tampere.Google Scholar
  28. Luukkonen, T. (1997), Why has Latour's theory of citations been ignored by the bibliometric community? Discussion of sociological interpretations of citation analysis. Scientometrics, 38: 27-37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. MacRoberts, M. H., MacRoberts, B. R. (1987), Testing the Ortega hypothesis: Facts and artifacts. Scientometrics, 12: 293-295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. MacRoberts, M. H., MacRoberts, B. R. (1996), Problems of citation analysis. Scientometrics, 36: 435-444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McInnes, R. G., Symes, D. (1988), David Riesman and the concept of bibliographic citation. College & Research Libraries, 12: 240-250.Google Scholar
  32. Merton, R. K. (1942), Science and technology in a democratic order. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1: 115-126.Google Scholar
  33. Merton, R. K. (1957), Priorities in scientific discoveries. American Sociological Review, 22: 635-659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Merton, R. K. (1968), The Matthew Effect in science. Science, 159(5): 56-63.Google Scholar
  35. Merton, R. K. (1979), Foreword to E. Garfield, Citation Indexing: Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities. New York: Wiley. v-ix.Google Scholar
  36. Merton, R. K. (1988), The Matthew Effect in science, II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. ISIS, 79: 606-623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mitroff, I. I. (1974), The Subjective Side of Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  38. Nicolaisen, J. (2003), The social act of citing: Towards new horizons in citation theory. Proceedings, American Society for Information Science and Technology, 40: 12-20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Paglia, C. (1999), Butler vs. Nussbaum: When poststructuralist feminists begin to attack each other, the end of the PC dynasty is near. Salon. http://www.salon.com/it/col/pagl/1999/02/24pagl.htmlGoogle Scholar
  40. Potter J. (1996), Representing Reality; Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Scientometrics. (1987), Volume 12 (5–6: 293-353) presented a controversy on citation and the Ortega hypothesis in which 13 papers responded to MacRoberts & MacRoberts, 1987.Google Scholar
  42. Sokal, A. D. (1996), Transgressing the boundaries: Toward a transformative hermeneutics of quantum gravity. Social Text, 46/47: 217-252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sokal, A., Bricmont, J. (1998), Fashionable Nonsense; Postmodern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science. New York: Picador USA.Google Scholar
  44. Storer, N. W. (1966), The Social System of Science. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  45. Thorne, F. C. (1977), The Citation Index — Another case of spurious validity. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 33: 1157-1161.Google Scholar
  46. White, H. D. (2000), Toward ego-centered citation analysis. In: B. Cronin, H. B. Atkins (Eds), The Web of Knowledge: A Festschrift in Honor of Eugene Garfield. Medford, NJ: Information Today. pp. 475-496.Google Scholar
  47. White, H. D. (2001a), Authors as citers over time. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52: 87-108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. White, H. D. (2001b), Author-centered bibliometrics through CAMEOs: Characterizations automatically made and edited online. Scientometrics, 51: 607-637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. White, H. D. (2003), Pathfinder networks and author cocitation analysis: A remapping of paradigmatic information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54: 423-434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. White, H. D. (2004), Citation analysis and discourse analysis revisited. Applied Linguistics, 25: 89-116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. White, H. D., McCain, K. W. (1998), Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49: 327-355.Google Scholar
  52. Willis, E. (1996), My Sokaled life; Or, revenge of the nerds. In: Editors Of Lingua Franca, The Sokal Hoax; The Sham that Shook the Academy. Lingua Franca Books. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. pp. 133-138.Google Scholar
  53. Woolgar, S. (1988), Science: The Very Idea. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  54. Zuckerman, H. (1987), Citation analysis and the complex problem of intellectual influence. Scientometrics, 12: 329-338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zuckerman, H. (1988), The sociology of science. In: N. Smelser (Ed.), Handbook of Sociology. Newbury Park: Sage. 511-574.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers/Akadémiai Kiadó 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Howard D. White
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Information Science and Technology, Drexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations