Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 60, Issue 1, pp 71–79 | Cite as

On the shoulders of Robert Merton: Towards a normative theory of citation

  • Henry Small
Article

Abstract

In a series of seminal studies Robert K. Merton created a coherent theoretical view of the social system of science that includes the salient features of the formal publication system, thereby providing a theoretical basis for scientometrics and citationology. A fundamental precept of this system is the view of citations as symbolic payment of intellectual debts. When this concept is merged with a complementary theory of the conceptual symbolism of citations, the possibility for a rapprochement of the normative and constructivist theories is achieved, where the dual function of citations as vehicles of peer recognition and constructed symbols for specific original achievements in science is realized. This new synthesis is embodied in a citation classification system, the citation cube, with dimensions of normative compliance, symbolic consensus, and disinterestedness (self-citation).

Keywords

Reward System Citation Behavior Normative Compliance Matthew Effect Original Message 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baldi, S. (1998), Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations: a network-analytic model. American Sociological Review, 63(6): 829-846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biagioli, M., Galison, P. (Eds) (2003), Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Cole, J. R., Cole, S. (1973), Social Stratification in Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Cozzens, S. E. (1988), Life-history of a knowledge claim: the opiate receptor case. Knowledge-Creation Diffusion Utilization, 9(4): 511-529.Google Scholar
  5. Crane, D. (1976), Reward systems in art, science and religion. American Behavioral Scientist, 19(6): 719-734.Google Scholar
  6. Cronin, B. (2000), Semiotics and evaluative bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 56(4): 440-453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Garfield, E. (1998), Random thoughts on citationology, its theory and practice. Scientometrics, 43(1): 69-76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Griffith, B. C. (1997), Discussion of nature of science provokes hit or miss debate. Physics Today, 50(1): 11.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. Kaplan, N. (1965), The norms of citation behavior: prolegomena to the footnote. American Documentation, 16(3): 179-184.Google Scholar
  10. Latour, B. (1987), Science in Action. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Merton, R. K. (1942), Science and technology in a democratic order. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1: 115-126. Reprinted in: The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973, pp. 267–278.Google Scholar
  12. Merton, R. K. (1957), Priorities in scientific discovery. American Sociological Review, 22(6): 635-659. Reprinted in: The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973, pp. 286–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Merton, R. K. (1961), Singletons and multiples in scientific discovery. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 105(5): 470-486. Reprinted in: The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973, pp. 343–370.Google Scholar
  14. Merton, R. K. (1963a), Resistance to the systematic study of multiple discoveries in science. European Journal of Sociology, 4: 237-249. Reprinted in: The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973, pp. 371–382.Google Scholar
  15. Merton, R. K. (1963b), Resistance to the systematic study of multiple discoveries in science. European Journal of Sociology, 4: 250-282. Reprinted in: The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973, pp. 383–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Merton, R. K. (1965), On the Shoulders of Giants: A Shandean Postscript. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  17. Merton, R. K. (1968), The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159(3810): 56-63. Reprinted in: The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973, pp. 438–459.Google Scholar
  18. Merton, R. K. (1969), Behavior patterns of scientists. American Scientist, 58: 1-23. Reprinted in: The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973, pp. 325–342.Google Scholar
  19. Merton, R. K. (1977), The Sociology of Science: An Episodic Memoir. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Merton, R. K. (1979), Foreword to Garfield, E., Citation Indexing — Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology and Humanities. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. Merton, R. K. (1988), The Matthew effect in science, 2: cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. ISIS, 79(299): 606-623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moravcsik, M. J., Murugesan, P. (1975), Some results on the function and quality of citations. Social Studies of Science, 5: 86-92.Google Scholar
  23. Palevitz, B. A. (1997), The ethics of citation: a matter of science's family values. The Scientist, 11(12): 8.Google Scholar
  24. Price, D. J. D. (1965), Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149(3683): 510.Google Scholar
  25. Small, H., Griffith, B. C. (1974), The structure of scientific literatures. 1: identifying and graphing specialties. Science Studies, 4(1): 17-40.Google Scholar
  26. Small, H. (1978), Cited documents as concept symbols. Social Studies of Science, 8(3): 327-340.Google Scholar
  27. Small, H. (1984), Lives of a scientific paper. In: Selectivity in Information Systems. K. Warren (Ed.), New York: Praeger, pp. 83-97.Google Scholar
  28. Small, H. (2003), Paradigms, citations, and maps of science: a personal history. American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5): 394-399.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stent, G. S. (1972), Prematurity and uniqueness in scientific discovery. Scientific American, 227(6): 84-93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers/Akadémiai Kiadó 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henry Small
    • 1
  1. 1.PhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations