Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 59, Issue 1, pp 79–93 | Cite as

The motivation for citing specific references by social scientists in Korea: The phenomenon of co-existing references

  • Kim Kapseon
Article

Abstract

This study, based on the premise that references are a social product that reflects the social environment of a society, is an attempt to explore the co-existence of Korean and non-Korean literature in the references to Korean papers. 321 authors (papers) who published in 43 issues of 24 Korean journals focused on the social sciences were surveyed about their research channels and citation motivations, and the 11,358 references in the papers were analyzed. The findings were as follows : (1) The extent of the co-existence was that non-Korean literature was cited 1.9 times (65.3%) more often than Korean literature; (2) Research channel was the most common non-Korean channel orientation (55.8%); (3) The motivation for citations was significantly dependent on whether the literature cited was Korean or non-Korean. Non-Korean literature was chiefly cited for conceptual (20.7%), perfunctory (16.0%), and persuasive (15.1%) motivations; (4) The citations and citation motivations behind non-Korean literature were significantly influenced by research channel, discipline, focus of research, publishing career, and type of paper. Of these variables, research channel was frequently related to the citation of non-Korean literature. Finally, this study is very suggestive on two counts: (1) Citation motivation might constitute a new approach for exploring the production of knowledge by researchers. (2) This study has demonstrated, in particular, an empirical relationship between knowledge produced by Korean social scientists and non-Korean knowledge through the analysis of citation motivation.

Keywords

Social Scientist Specific Reference Social Environment Empirical Relationship Social Product 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, B. (1997), Referring to schools of thought: An example of symbolic citations, Social Studies of Science, 27: 937-949.Google Scholar
  2. Amsterdamska, O., Leydesdorff, L. (1989), Citations: Indicators of significance?, Scientometrics, 15(5–6): 449-471.Google Scholar
  3. Brittain, M. (1989), Cultural boundaries of the social sciences in the 1990s: New policies for documentation, information and knowledge creation, International Social Science Journal, 41(1): 105-114.Google Scholar
  4. Brooks, T. A. (1986), Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(1): 34-36.Google Scholar
  5. Case, D. O., Higgins, G. M. (2000), How can we investigate citation behavior?:A study of reasons for literature in communication, Journal of The American Society for Information Science, 51(7): 635-645.Google Scholar
  6. Chubin, D. E., Moitra, S. D. (1975), Content analysis of references: Adjunct or alternative to citation counting?, Social Studies of Science, 5: 423-441.Google Scholar
  7. Cozzens, S. E. (1989), What do citations count?: The rhetoric-first model, Scientometrics 15(5–6): 437-447.Google Scholar
  8. Frost, C. O. (1979), The use of citations in literary research: A preliminary classification of citation functions, Library Quarterly, 49(4): 399-414.Google Scholar
  9. Kaplan, N. (1965), The norms of citation behavior: Prolegomena to the footnote, American Documentation, 16(3): 178-184.Google Scholar
  10. Kim, K. (1999), Modeling the citation environment factors influencing citation motivations, Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 33(1): 67-86.Google Scholar
  11. Lipetz, B.-A. (1965), Improvement of the selectivity of citation indexes to science literature through the inclusion of citation relationship indicators, American Documentation, 16(2): 81-90.Google Scholar
  12. Moravcsik, M. J., Murugesan, P. (1975), Some results of the function and quality of citation, Social Studies of Science, 5: 86-92.Google Scholar
  13. Murugesan, P., Moravcsik, M. J. (1978), Variation of the nature of citation measures with journals and scientific specialities, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 29(3): 141-147.Google Scholar
  14. Oppenheim, C., Renn, S. P. (1978), Highly cited old papers and the reasons why they continue to be cited, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 29(5): 227-231.Google Scholar
  15. Peritz, B. C. (1983a), Are methodological papers more cited than theoretical or empirical ones ?: The case of sociology, Scientometrics, 5(4): 211-218.Google Scholar
  16. Peritz, B. C. (1983b), A Classification of citation roles for the social sciences and related fields, Scientometrics, 5(5): 303-312.Google Scholar
  17. Shadish, W. R., Toliver, D., Gray, M., Gupta, S. K. (1995), Author judgements about works they cite: Three studies from psychology journals, Social Studies of Science, 25: 477-498.Google Scholar
  18. Vinkler, P. (1987), A Quasi-quantitative citation model, Scientometrics, 12(1–2): 47-72.Google Scholar
  19. Weinstock, M. (1971), Citation indexes, In: Encyclopaedia of Library and Information Science, Vol. 5., Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 16-40.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publisher/Akadémiai Kiadó 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kim Kapseon
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Library and Information ScienceSungkyunkwan UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations