Science & Education

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 179–195 | Cite as

Pseudohistory and Pseudoscience

  • Douglas Allchin


The dangers of pseudoscience – parapsychology, astrology,creationism, etc. – are widely criticized. Lessons in the history of science are oftenviewed as an educational remedy by conveying the nature of science. But such histories canbe flawed. In particular, many stories romanticize scientists, inflate the drama of their discoveries,and oversimplify the process of science. They are, literally and rhetorically, myths.While based on real historical events, they distort the basis of scientific authority and fosterunwarranted stereotypes. Such stories are pseudohistory. Like pseudoscience, they promotefalse ideas about science – in this case, about how science works. Paradoxically, perhaps,the history of pseudosciences may offer an excellent vehicle for remedying such impressions.

Characteristically, textbooks of science contain just a bit of history, either in an introductory chapteror, more often, in scattered references to the great heroes of an earlier age. From suchreferences both students and professionals come to feel like participants in a long-standinghistorical tradition. Yet the textbook-derived tradition in which scientists come to sensetheir participation is one that, in fact, never existed.

–Thomas Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions


Historical Event Scientific Revolution Introductory Chapteror Scientific Authority Excellent Vehicle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allchin, D.: 1994, 'Phlogiston After Oxygen', Ambix 39, 110-116.Google Scholar
  2. Allchin, D.: 1995, 'How Not to Teach History in Science', in F. Finley, D. Allchin, D. Rhees and S. Fifield (eds.), Proceedings, Third International History, Philosophy and Science Teaching Conference, Vol. 1, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, pp. 13-22. Reprinted in The Pantaneto Forum #7 (July, 2002), URL: Scholar
  3. Allchin, D.: 1997, 'Rekindling Phlogiston: From Classroom Case Study to Interdisciplinary Relationships', Science and Education 6, 473-509.Google Scholar
  4. Allchin, D.: 2001, 'Kettlewell's Missing Evidence, a Study in Black and White', Journal of College Science Teaching 31, 240-245.Google Scholar
  5. Allchin, D.: 2003a, 'Scientific Myth-Conceptions', Science Education 87, 329-351.Google Scholar
  6. Allchin, D.: 2003b, 'Lawson's Shoehorn', Science and Education 12, 315-329.Google Scholar
  7. Boyle, R.: 1699, The Works of the Honorable Robert Boyle, Esq., Epitomized, Richard Boulton, London.Google Scholar
  8. Boyle, R.: 1672/1673, 'An Essay about the Origins &; Virtues of Gems', in Essays on the Strange Subtilty, Determinate Nature, Great Efficacy of Effluviums, London.Google Scholar
  9. Brush, S.G.: 1974, 'Should the History of Science Be Rated “X”?', Science 18, 1164-1172.Google Scholar
  10. Brush, S.G.: 2002, 'Cautious Revolutionaries: Maxwell, Planck, Hubble', American Journal of Physics 70, 119-128.Google Scholar
  11. Butterfield, H.: 1931, The Whig Interpretation of History, G. Bell and Sons, London.Google Scholar
  12. Carroll, R.T.: 2001, 'Pseudohistory', The Skeptic's Dictionary, URL: [updated December 31, 2001; accessed October 12, 2002].Google Scholar
  13. The College Board: 1999, The Spanish Flu and Its Legacy, College Board Publications, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  14. Cordingley, B.: 2001, In Your Face: What Facial Features Reveal about the People You Know and Love, New Horizon Press, East Rutherford, NJ.Google Scholar
  15. Dobbs, B.J.: 1975, The Foundations of Newton's Alchemy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  16. Fee, E.: 1979, 'Nineteenth-Century Craniology: The Study of the Female Skull', Bulletin of the History of Medicine 53, 415-433.Google Scholar
  17. Frank, R.G., Jr.: 1980, Harvey and the Oxford Physiologists, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  18. Gauld, C.F.: 1977, 'The Role of History in the Teaching of Science', The Australian Science Teachers Journal 23(3), 47-52.Google Scholar
  19. Gauld, C.: 1992, 'The Historical Anecdote as a “Caricature”: A Case Study', Research in Science Education 22, 149-156.Google Scholar
  20. Gould, S.J.: 1980, The Panda's Thumb, W.W. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Gould, S.J.: 1981, The Mismeasure of Man, W.W. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Gregory, A.: 2001, Harvey's Heart, Icon Books, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  23. Hagen, J.B., Allchin, D. &; Singer, F.: 1996, Doing Biology, Harper Collins, Glenview, IL.Google Scholar
  24. Hamburger, J.: 1992, The Diary of William Harvey, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
  25. Kipling, R.: 1902, Just So Stories, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  26. Klein, M.J.: 1972, 'The Use and Abuse of Historical Teaching in Physics', in S.G. Brush and A.L. King (eds.), History in the Teaching of Physics, University Press of New England, Hanover, NH, pp. 12-18.Google Scholar
  27. Lawson, A.: 2000, 'The Generality of the Hypothetico-Deductive Method: Making Scientific Thinking Explicit', American Biology Teacher 62, 482-495.Google Scholar
  28. Lawson, A.: 2002, 'What Does Galileo's Discovery of Jupiter's Moons Tell Us about the Process of Scientific Discovery?', Science and Education 11, 1-24.Google Scholar
  29. Lawson, A.: in press, 'T. rex, the Crater of Doom and the Nature of Scientific Discovery', Science and Education.Google Scholar
  30. Lienhard, J.H.: 1988–1997, 'Ignaz Philipp Semmelweis', The Engines of Our Ingenuity, Episode 622. URL: [accessed October 12, 2002].Google Scholar
  31. Matthews, M.: 1994, Science Teaching: A Role for History and Philosophy of Science, Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
  32. Matthews, M.: 2000, Time for Science Education, Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  33. McComas, W.F.: 1998, 'The Principal Elements of the Nature of Science: Dispelling the Myths', in W.F. McComas (ed.), The Nature of Science in Science Education, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 53-70.Google Scholar
  34. Pagel, W.: 1967, William Harvey's Biological Ideas, Hafner, New York.Google Scholar
  35. Pagel, W.: 1977, New Light on William Harvey, S. Karger, Basel.Google Scholar
  36. Principe, L.: 1999, Robert Boyle: Aspiring Adept, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
  37. Shermer, M. &; Grobman, A.: 2000, Denying History: Who Says the Holocaust Never Happened &; Why Do They Say It?, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  38. Sterling, J.: 1994, 'The World According to Disney: Trading in Fantasies', Earth Island Journal 9(3), 32+. (URL:, accessed September 29, 2002).Google Scholar
  39. Toumey, C.: 1996, Conjuring Science, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
  40. Wallace, M.: 1996, Mickey Mouse History and Other Essays on American Memory, Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  41. Whitaker, M.A.B.: 1979, 'History and Quasi-history in Physics Education', Physics Education 14, 108, 239.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Douglas Allchin
    • 1
  1. 1.Program in the History of Science and TechnologyUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA (

Personalised recommendations