Advertisement

Small Business Economics

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 155–162 | Cite as

Determinants of Innovation

  • Mita Bhattacharya
  • Harry Bloch
Article

Abstract

The study examines how firm size, market structure, profitability and growth influence innovative activity in small to medium sized Australian manufacturing businesses, using the recently released Confidentialised Unit Record File drawn from the Business Longitudinal Survey of the Australian Bureau of Statistics. Regression analysis is conducted to determine the factors that effect subsequent innovative activity for the full sample of businesses, as well as for sub-samples of firms from high and low-technological opportunity industries. Most variables, including size, R&D intensity, market structure and trade shares are found to be conducive to further innovative activity for the full sample and for high-tech firms. For low-tech industries, fewer variables are significant.

Keywords

Regression Analysis Full Sample Firm Size Industrial Organization Market Structure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ABS, 1999, Business Longitudinal Survey, 1994–1995 to 1997–1998, Technical Paper, Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  2. Acs, Z. J. and D. B. Audretsch, 1987, ‘Innovation, Market Structure and Firm Size’, Review of Economics and Statistics 69, 567-575.Google Scholar
  3. Acs, Z. J. and D. B. Audretsch, 1988, ‘Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis’, American Economic Review 78, 678-690.Google Scholar
  4. Acs, Z. J. and D. B. Audretsch, 1990, Innovation and Small Firms, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Acs, Z. J. and D. B. Audretsch, 1991, ‘R&;D, Firm Size and Innovative Activity’, in Z. J. Acs and D. B. Audretsch (eds.), Innovation and Technological Change: An International Comparison, Hertfordshire, U.K.: Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp. 39-59.Google Scholar
  6. Audretsch, D.B., 1995, ‘Firm Profitability, Growth, and Innovation’, Review of Industrial Organization 10, 579-588.Google Scholar
  7. Baldwin, W. L. and J. T. Scott, 1987, Market Structure and Technological Change, Chichester: Harwood.Google Scholar
  8. Branch, B., 1974, ‘Research and Development Activity and Profitability: A Distributed Lag Analysis’, Journal of Political Economy 82, 999-1011.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, W. M., 1995, ‘Empirical Studies of Innovative Activity’, in P. Stoneman (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technical Change, Oxford, UK: Blackwell, pp. 182-264.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, W. M. and R. C. Levin, 1989, ‘Empirical Studies of Innovation and Market Structure’, in R. Schmalensee and R. Willig (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 1059-1107.Google Scholar
  11. Cohen, W. M., R. C. Levin and D. C. Mowery, 1987, ‘Firm Size and R&;D Intensity: A Re-examination’, Journal of Industrial Economics 35, 544-565.Google Scholar
  12. Doi, N., 1994, ‘Firm Size and R&;D Activity in Japanese Manufacturing Industries’, Science and Public Policy 21, 295-308.Google Scholar
  13. Doi, N., 1996, ‘Performance of Japanese Firms in Patented Inventions: An Analysis of Patents Granted in the U.S.’, Review of Industrial Organization 11, 49-68.Google Scholar
  14. Fisher, F. M. and P. Temin, 1973, ‘Returns to Scale in Research and Development: What Does the Schumpeterian Hypothesis Imply?’, Journal of Political Economy 81, 56-70.Google Scholar
  15. Galbraith, J. K., 1952, American Capitalism: The Concept of Countervailing Power, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  16. Grabowski, H. G., 1968, ‘The Determinants of Industrial Research and Development: A Study of the Chemical, Drug and Petroleum Industries’, Journal of Political Economy 76, 527-547.Google Scholar
  17. Johnston, J. and J. Dinardo, 1997, Econometric Methods, Fourth Edition, Singapore: McGraw-Hill International Edition.Google Scholar
  18. Kamien, M. I. and N. L. Schwartz, 1982, Market Structure and Innovation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Kelly, T. M., 1970, The Influence of Firm Size and Market Structure on the Research Efforts of Large Multiple-product Firms, Ph.D. dissertation, Okalahoma State University.Google Scholar
  20. Kohn, M. and J. T. Scott, 1982, ‘Scale Economies in Research and Development: The Schumpeterian Hypothesis’, Journal of Industrial Economics 30, 239-249.Google Scholar
  21. Levin, R. C., W. M. Cohen and D. C. Mowery, 1985, ‘R&;D Appropriability, Opportunity, and Market Structure: New Evidence on Some Schumpeterian Hypotheses’, American Economic Review 75(2), 20-24.Google Scholar
  22. Levin, R. C. and P. C. Reiss, 1984, ‘Test of a Schumpeterian Model of R&;D and Market Structure’, in Z. Griliches (ed.), R&;D, Patents, and Productivity, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. McLean, I. W. and D. K. Round, 1978, ‘Research and Product Innovation in Australian Manufacturing Industries’, Journal of Industrial Economics 27, 1-12.Google Scholar
  24. Mueller, D.C., 1967, ‘The Firm Decision Process: An Econometric Investigation’, Journal of Political Economy 81, 58-87.Google Scholar
  25. OECD, 1996, The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities (Oslo Manual), Second Edition, Paris: DSTI, OECD.Google Scholar
  26. Phillips, R., 1997, Innovation and Firm Performance in Australian Manufacturing, Staff Research Paper, Canberra: Industry Commission.Google Scholar
  27. Scherer, F. M., 1965, ‘Firm Size, Market Structure, Opportunity and The-output of Patented Inventions’, American Economic Review 55, 1097-1125.Google Scholar
  28. Scherer, F. M., 1970, Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  29. Scherer, F. M., 1991, ‘Changing Perspectives on the Firm Size Problem’, in Z. J. Acs and D. B. Audetsch (eds.), Innovation and Technological Change: An International Comparison, Hertfordshire, U.K.: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 24-38.Google Scholar
  30. Schumpeter, J. A., 1950, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Third Edition, New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  31. Scott, J. T., 1984, ‘Firm Versus Industry Variability in R&;D Intensity’, in Z. Griliches (ed.), R&;D Patents and Productivity, Chicago: University of Chicago Press for the NBER.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mita Bhattacharya
    • 1
  • Harry Bloch
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsMonash UniversityAustralia E-mail
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsCurtin UniversityPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations