Small Business Economics

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 141–153

Networks, Firm Size and Innovation

  • Mark Rogers


Using survey data on Australian firms this paper investigates the determinants of innovation. Various possible determinants are investigated, including market structure, export status, the use of networks, and training. Regression analysis is conducted separately for manufacturing and non-manufacturing firms and, within each sector, by firm size categories. The results include evidence of persistence in innovative activities and that the use of networks is associated with innovation in some sector-firm size categories. Specifically, small manufacturing firms exhibit a positive association between networking and innovation. In contrast, for non-manufacturing firms this association is present for medium and large sized firms.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Acemoglu, D., 1997, ‘Training and Innovation in an Imperfect Labour Market’, Review of Economic Studies 64, 445-464.Google Scholar
  2. Acs, Z. and S. C. Isberg, 1991, ‘Innovation, Firm Size and Corporate Finance’, Economic Letters 35, 323-326.Google Scholar
  3. Acs, Z. J. and D. B. Audretsch, 1988, ‘Innovation in Large and Small Firms’, American Economic Review 78, 678-690.Google Scholar
  4. Almeida, P. and B. Kogut, 1997, ‘The Exploration of Technological Diversity and the Geographical Localization of Innovation’, Small Business Economics 9, 21-31.Google Scholar
  5. Arvanitis, S., 1997, ‘The Impact of Firm Size on Innovative Activity — an Empirical Analysis Based on Swiss Firm Data’, Small Business Economics 9, 473-490.Google Scholar
  6. Audretsch, D. and M. Vivarelli, 1994, ‘Small Firms and R&;D Spillovers: Evidence from Italy’, CEPR Discussion Paper 927.Google Scholar
  7. Australia Manufacturing Council, 1994, The Wealth of Ideas: How Linkages Help Sustain Innovation and Growth, Australian Manufacturing Council.Google Scholar
  8. Bishop, P. and N. Wiseman, 1999, ‘External Ownership and Innovation in the United Kingdom’, Applied Economics 31, 443-450.Google Scholar
  9. Blundell, R., R. Griffith and J. Van Reenen, 1995, ‘Dynamic Count Data Models of Technological Innovation’, Economic Journal 105, 333-344.Google Scholar
  10. Blundell, R., R. Griffith and J. Van Reenen, 1998, ‘Market Share, Market Value and Innovation in a Panel of British Manufacturing Firms’, mimeo, UCL and IFS.Google Scholar
  11. Cohen, W., 1995, ‘Empirical Studies of Innovative Activity’, in P. Stoneman (eds), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cohen, W. and S. Klepper, 1996, ‘A Reprise of Size and R&;D’, Economic Journal 106, 925-951.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, W. M. and R. C. Levin, 1989, ‘Empirical Studies of Innovation and Market Structure’, in R. Schmalensee and R. D. Willig (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organisation, Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  14. Cohen, W. and D. Levinthal, 1989, ‘Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&;D’, Economic Journal 99, 569-596.Google Scholar
  15. Deaton, A., 1997, The Analysis of Household Surveys, Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
  16. Dijk, B., R. Hertog, B. Menkveld and R. Thurik, 1997, ‘Some New Evidence on the Determinants of Large-and Small-Firm Innovation’, Small Business Economics 9, 335-343.Google Scholar
  17. Drago, R. and M. Wooden, 1994, ‘Unions, Innovation and Investment: Australian Evidence’, Applied Economics 26, 609-615.Google Scholar
  18. DuMouchel, W. H. and G. J. Duncan, 1983, ‘Using Sample Survey Weights in Multiple Regression Analyses of Stratified Samples’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 78, 535-543.Google Scholar
  19. Feldman, M. P., 1994, ‘Knowledge Complementarity and Innovation’, Small Business Economics 6, 363-372.Google Scholar
  20. Freeman, C., 1991, ‘Networks of Innovators: A Synthesis of Research Issues’, Research Policy 20, 499-514.Google Scholar
  21. Gospel, H., 1991, ‘Industrial Training and Technological Innovation: An Introduction’, in H. Gospel (eds.), Industrial Training and Technological Innovation, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Harrison, B., M. Kelley and J. Gant, 1996, ‘Innovative Firm Behaviour and Local Milieu: Exploring the Intersection of Agglomeration, Firm Effects, and Technological Change’, Economic Geography 72(3), 233-258.Google Scholar
  23. Hobday, M., 1995, Innovation in East Asia, Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  24. Karlsson, C. and O. Olsson, 1998, ‘Product Innovation in Small and Large Enterprises’, Small Business Economics 10, 31-46.Google Scholar
  25. Lefebvre, E., L. Lefebvre and M. Bourgault, 1998, ‘R&;D-Related Capabilities as Determinants of Export Performance’, Small Business Economics 10, 365-377.Google Scholar
  26. Love, J. and S. Roper, 1999, ‘The Determinants of Innovation: R&;D, Technology Transfer and Networking Effects’, Review of Industrial Organisation 15, 43-64.Google Scholar
  27. Love, J., B. Ashcroft and S. Dunlop, 1996, ‘Corporate Structure, Ownership and the Likelihood of Innovation’, Applied Economics 28, 737-746.Google Scholar
  28. MacPherson, A. D., 1997, ‘A Comparison of Within-Firm and External Sources of Product Innovation’, Growth and Change 28, 289-308.Google Scholar
  29. Marceau, J., 1992, Reworking the World: Organisations, Technologies, and Cultures in Comparative Perspective, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  30. Nunes, N., G. Crockett and P. Dawkins, 1993, ‘The Impact of Competition and Trade Unions on Workplace reform and Organisational and Technological Change’, Australian Economic Review, 71-88.Google Scholar
  31. Phillips, R., 1997, ‘Innovation and Firm Performance in Australian Manufacturing’. Industry Commission, Staff Research Paper (Canberra).Google Scholar
  32. Rogers, M., 1998, ‘The Definition and Measurement of Innovation’, Melbourne Institute Working Paper 10/98.Google Scholar
  33. Rogers, M., 1999a, ‘Innovation in Australian Workplaces: An Empirical Analysis using AWIRS 1990 and 1995’, Melbourne Institute Working Paper 3/99.Google Scholar
  34. Rogers, M., 1999b, ‘The Influence of Diversification and Market Structure on the R&;D Intensity of Large Australian Firms’, Paper presented at Industry Economics Conference, Melbourne, July.Google Scholar
  35. Rothwell, R. and M. Dodgson, 1994, ‘Innovation and Size of Firm’, in M. Dodgson and R. Rothwell (eds.), The Handbook of Industrial Innovation, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  36. Sako, M., 1999, ‘From Individual Skills to Organizational Capability in Japan’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 15, 114-126.Google Scholar
  37. Symeonidis, G., 1996, ‘Innovation, Firm Size and Market Structure: Schumpeterian Hypotheses and Some New Themes’, OECD Economics Dept. Working Paper 161.Google Scholar
  38. Teece, D. J., 1996, ‘Firm Organisation, Industrial Structure, and Technological Innovation’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 31, 192-224.Google Scholar
  39. Tether, B. S., 1998, ‘Small and Large Firms: Sources of Unequal Innovations?’, Research Policy 27, 725-745.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Rogers
    • 1
  1. 1.Harris Manchester CollegeOxfordU.K

Personalised recommendations