Research in Higher Education

, Volume 45, Issue 2, pp 97–114 | Cite as

The Relationship Between Institutional Expenditures and Degree Attainment at Baccalaureate Colleges

Article

Abstract

Enhancing student persistence and effectively managing financial resources present important challenges to higher education. Surprisingly, existing student persistence and attrition models offer little insight into the potential links between institutional expenditures and student persistence. This study examines the impact of institutional expenditures on 6-year cohort graduation rates at 363 Carnegie-classified Baccalaureate I and II institutions. The results suggest a positive and significant relationship between instructional and academic support expenditures and cohort graduation rates. As a result, researchers might consider ways to integrate expenditure variables into student persistence models. Institutions also might seek out ways to shift financial resources to areas that enhance student persistence and degree attainment. Additional research may serve to strengthen student persistence frameworks and improve links between persistence research and financial decisionmaking in colleges and universities.

institutional expenditures degree attainment persistence retention higher education finance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ACT Incorporated (2002, November). College graduation rates steady despite increase in enrollment [On-line]. Available: http://www.act.org/news/releases/2002/11-15-02. htmlGoogle Scholar
  2. Astin, A. W. (1993). What Matters in College: Four Critical Years Revisited, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  3. Bean, J. P. (1980). Dropouts and turnover: The synthesis and test of a causal model of student attrition. Research in Higher Education 12: 155-187.Google Scholar
  4. Beekhoven, S., De Jong, U., and Van Hout, H. (2002). Explaining academic progress via combining concepts of integration theory and rational choice theory. Research in Higher Education 43: 577-600.Google Scholar
  5. Belfield, C. R., and Thomas, H. R. (2000). The relationship between resources and performance in further education colleges. Oxford Review of Education 26: 239–253.Google Scholar
  6. Braxton, J. M. (2000). Reworking the Student Departure Puzzle (1st Ed.), Vanderbilt University Press, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
  7. Cabrera, A. F., and Castaneda, M. B. (1993). The convergence between two theories of college persistence. Journal of Higher Education 63: 143-164.Google Scholar
  8. Card, D., and Krueger, A. (1996). School resources and student outcomes: An overview of the literature and new evidence from North and South Carolina. Journal of Economic Perspectives 10: 31-50.Google Scholar
  9. Chickering, A. W., and Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin 37(7): 3-7.Google Scholar
  10. College Entrance Examination Board (1997). The College Handbook, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Consortium for Student Retention Data Exchange (2002). 2000-01 CSRDE report: The retention and graduation rates in 344 colleges and universities [On-line]. Available: http://www.occe.ou.edu/csrde/execsum.pdfGoogle Scholar
  12. DesJardins, S. L., Ahlburg, D. A., and McCall, B. P. (1999). An event history model of student departure. Economics of Education Review 18: 375-390.Google Scholar
  13. Donald, J. (1997). Improving the Environment for Learning: Academic Leaders Talk About What Works, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  14. Fortune, J. C. (1993). Why production function analysis is irrelevant in policy deliberations concerning educational funding equity. Education Policy Analysis Archives 1(11).Google Scholar
  15. Fox, J. (1991). Regression diagnostics. Sage University Papers. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.Google Scholar
  16. Gujarati, D. N. (1995). Basic Econometrics (3rd Ed.), McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Guskin, A. E. (1994a). Reducing student costs and enhancing student learning: The university challenge of the 90's-Part I: Restructuring the administration. Change 26(4): 22-29.Google Scholar
  18. Guskin, A. E. (1994b). Reducing student costs and enhancing student learning: The university challenge of the 90's-Part II: Restructuring role of faculty. Change 26(5): 16-25.Google Scholar
  19. Hanushek, E. A. (1997). Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: an update. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 19: 141-164.Google Scholar
  20. Harvey-Smith, A. (n.d.). Student Retention: Theory, Accountability, and Intervention, Community College Survey of Student Engagement (Student Success Initiative), Austin, TX. Available: http://ccsse.org/ssi//docs/Harvey-Smith_Alicia_Retention_Article.pdfGoogle Scholar
  21. Hodas, S. (1993). Is water an input to a fish?: Problems with the production-function model in education. Education Policy Analysis Archives 1(12).Google Scholar
  22. Hoyt, J. E. (2001). First-Year Retention at Utah Valley State College: A Follow-Up Study, Utah Valley State College, Institutional Research and Management Studies, Orem. Available: www.uvsc.edu/ir/research/fal19900nr.htmGoogle Scholar
  23. Kuh, G. D. (2002). The College Student Report (4th Ed), National Survey of Student Engagement, Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning, Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
  24. Levin, B. (1993). Students and educational productivity. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis 1(5).Google Scholar
  25. Marco, G. L., Abdel-fattah, A. A., and Baron, P. A. (1992). Methods used to establish score comparability on the enhanced ACT assessment and the SAT (College Board Report No. 92-3), The College Board, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Massy, W. F. (ed.) (1996). Resource Allocation in Higher Education, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  27. Meisinger, R. J. (1994). College and University Budgeting: An Introduction for Faculty and Academic Administrators (2nd Ed.), NACUBO, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  28. Monk, D. H. (1992). Education productivity research: An update and assessment of its role in education finance reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 14(4): 307-332.Google Scholar
  29. Monk, D. H. (1993). A reply to Mr. Hodas. Education Policy Analysis Archives 1(15).Google Scholar
  30. National Center for Education Statistics (1997). Current Funds Revenues and Expenditures of Institutions of Higher Education: Fiscal Years 1987 through 1995 (NCES Publication No. 97-441), National Center for Education Statistics, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  31. National Survey of Student Engagement (2001). NSSE technical and norms report, Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning, Bloomington.Google Scholar
  32. Pace, C. R. (1984). Measuring the Quality of College Student Experiences, University of California, Los Angeles, Center for the Study of Evaluation, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  33. Pascarella, E. T., and Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How College Affects Students: Findings and Insights from Twenty Years of Research, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  34. Patrick, W. J. (2001). Estimating first-year student attrition rates: An application of multilevel modeling using categorical variables. Research in Higher Education 42: 151-170.Google Scholar
  35. Porter, S. R. (2000). The robustness of the graduation rate performance indicator used in the U.S. News and World Report college rankings. International Journal of Educational Advancement 1(2): 145-163.Google Scholar
  36. Pritchett, L., and Fulmer, D. (1997). What education production functions really show: A positive theory of education expenditures. Economics of Education Review 18(2): 223-239.Google Scholar
  37. Smart, J. C., Ethington, C. A., Riggs, R. O., and Thompson, M. D. (2002). Influences of institutional expenditure patterns on the development of students' leadership competencies. Research in Higher Education 43: 115-132.Google Scholar
  38. Spady, W. (1971). Drop-outs from higher education: Toward an empirical model. Interchange 1: 38-82.Google Scholar
  39. St. John, E. P., Hu, S. (2001). Student persistence in a public higher education system. Journal of Higher Education 72(3): 265-285.Google Scholar
  40. Tillman, C. A., Sr. (2002). Barriers to student persistence in higher education. Diadache: Faithful Teaching 2(1). Available: http://www.nazarene.org/iboe/riie/Diadache/Diadache_ vol2_1/barriers1.htmGoogle Scholar
  41. Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research 45: 89-125.Google Scholar
  42. Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  43. Toutkoushian, R. K. (1999). The value of cost functions for policymaking and research in higher education. Research in Higher Education 40: 1-15.Google Scholar
  44. Upcraft, M. L., and Gardner, J. N. (1989). The Freshman Year Experience: Helping Students Survive and Succeed in College, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  45. Wenglinsky, H. (1997). When Money Matters: How Educational Expenditures Improve Student Performance and How They Don't, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Franciscan University of SteubenvilleSteubenville

Personalised recommendations