International Review of Education

, Volume 50, Issue 1, pp 53–71

The Impact of Phonological-Awareness and Rapid-Reading Training on the Reading Skills of Adolescent and Adult Neoliterates

  • James M. Royer
  • Helen Abadzi
  • Jules Kinda
Article

Abstract

This study compares the reading performance of adolescent and adult neoliterates in Burkina Faso who participated in one of three experimental educational programs with the reading performance of neoliterates who took part in a standard (control) educational program. The experimental programs involved training in phonological awareness, training in the rapid identification of reading material and an approach that involved both phonological-awareness and rapid-reading training. Results show that students enrolled in the experimental programs made greater gains in reading skills than did students enrolled in the standard educational programs.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abadzi, Helen. 2003. Adult Literacy: A Review of Implementation Experience. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, Marilyn J. 1990. Beginning to Read: Thinking and Learning about Print. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, John R. 1983. The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, John R. 1990. The Adaptive Character of Thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, John R., and Christian Lebiere. 1998. The Atomic Components of Thought. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Ardila, Alfredo, Feggy V. Ostrosky-Solis, and Victor Uriel-Mendozza. 2000. Learning to Read is Much More Than Learning to Read: A Neuropsychologically Based Reading Program. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 6: 789–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carr-Hill, Roy, Aikel Kweka, Mary Rusimbi, and Rustica Chendgelele. 1991. The Functioning and Effects of the Tanzanian Literacy Programme. IIEP Research Report No. 93. Paris: International Institute of Educational Planning.Google Scholar
  8. Carron, Gabriel, Kilemi Mwiria, and Gabriel Righa. 1989. The Functioning and Effects of the Kenya Literacy Programme. IIEP Research Report No. 76. Paris: International Institute of Educational Planning.Google Scholar
  9. Diagne, Amadou. 1999. Basic Education and Livelihood Opportunities for Illiterate and Semiliterate Young Adults — BELOISYA — Especially Young Women in Countries with Low Rates of Enrollment in Primary Schools. Synthesis of Project Evaluation Reviews. Human Development, Africa Region. Paper Prepared for the Review and Design Workshop, March 15–19. N'Djamena, Chad: World Bank.Google Scholar
  10. Fodor, Jerry A. 1983. The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Forster, Kenneth I. 1979. Levels of Processing and Structure of the Language Processor. In: Sentence Processing: Psycholinguistic Studies Presented to Merill Garrett, ed. by William E. Cooper and Edward C. T. Walker, 27–85. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Iredale, Robyn. 1994. Why do Donors Find Literacy Difficult? Journal of Practice in Education for Development 1(1): 31–33.Google Scholar
  13. Kintsch, Walter. 1988. The Use of Knowledge in Discourse Processing: A Construction Integration Model. Psychological Review 95: 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kintsch, Walter. 1998. Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Lauglo, John. 2000. Engaging with Adults: The Case for Increased Support to Adult Basic Education in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  16. Lind, Agneta, and Anton Johnston. 1990. Adult Literacy in the Third World. A Reviewof Objectives and Strategies. Stockholm: SIDA.Google Scholar
  17. Moulton, Jeanne. 1997. Non-formal Education and Empowered Behavior. Washington, DC: Academy for Educational Development.Google Scholar
  18. Okech, Anthony, Roy Carr-Hill, Ann Katahoire, et al. 1999. Report of Evaluation of the Functional Adult Literacy Programme in Uganda. Kampala, Uganda: Ministry of Gender, Labour and Social Development.Google Scholar
  19. Perfetti, Charles A. 1988. Verbal Efficiency in Reading Ability. In: Reading Research: Advances in Theory and Practice, ed. by Michelle Daneman, George E. MacKinnon and Thomas Waller, vol. 6, 109–143. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Perfetti, Charles A. 1992. The Representation Problem in Reading Acquisition. In: Reading Acquisition, ed. by Phillip Gough, Linea Ehri and Rebecca Trieman. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  21. Royer, James M. 1985. Reading from the Perspective of a Biological Metaphor. Contemporary Educational Psychology 10: 150–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Royer, James M. 1997. A Cognitive Perspective on the Assessment, Diagnosis and Remediation of Reading Skills. In: Handbook of Academic Learning, ed. by Gary D. Phye, 199–234. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  23. Royer, James M., and Gale M. Sinatra, 1994. A Cognitive Theoretical Approach to Reading Diagnostics. Educational Psychology Review 6: 81–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stanovich, Keith E. 1986. Matthew Effects in Reading: Some Consequences of Individual Differences in the Acquisition of Literacy. Reading Research Quarterl 26: 269–280.Google Scholar
  25. Stanovich, Keith E. 1990. Concepts in Developmental Theories of Reading Skill: Cognitive Resources, Automaticity, and Modularity. Developmental Review 10: 72–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. United States National Research Council. 1998. Preventing Reading Difficulties in Young Children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  27. Van Dijk, Tuen A., and Walter Kintsch. 1983. Strategies for Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  28. UNESCO/UNDP. 1976. The Experimental World Literacy Programme: A Critical Assessment. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  29. World Bank. 2001. Education for Dynamic Economies: Accelerating Progress Towards Education for All (EFA). Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • James M. Royer
    • 1
  • Helen Abadzi
    • 2
  • Jules Kinda
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MassachusettsAmherstUSA
  2. 2.The World BankWashington DCUSA

Personalised recommendations