Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 353–376 | Cite as

Risk, Mispricing, and Value Investing

  • Eli Bartov
  • Myungsun Kim


We evaluate the stock return performance of a modified version of the book-to-market strategy and its implications for market efficiency. If the previously documented superior stock return of the book-to-market strategy represents mispricing, its performance should be improved by excluding fairly valued firms with extreme book-to-market ratios. To attain this, we classify stocks as value or glamour on book-to-market ratios and accounting accruals jointly. This joint classification is likely to exclude stocks with extreme book-to-market ratios due to mismeasured accounting book values reflecting limitations underlying the accounting system. Using both 12-month buy-and-hold returns and earnings announcement returns, our results show that this joint classification generates substantially higher portfolio returns in the post-portfolio-formation year than the book-to-market classification alone with no evidence of increased risk. In addition, this superior stock return performance is more pronounced among firms held primarily by small (unsophisticated) investors and followed less closely by market participants (stock price <$10). Finally, and most importantly, financial analysts are overly optimistic (pessimistic) about earnings of glamour (value) stock, and for a subset of firms identified as overvalued by our strategy, the earnings announcement raw return, as well as abnormal return, is negative. These last results are particularly important because it is hard to envision a model consistent with rational investors holding risky stocks with predictable negative raw returns for a long period of time rather than holding fT-bills and with financial analysts systematically overestimating the earnings of these stocks while underestimating earnings of stocks that outperform the stock market.

book-to-market market efficiency mispricing accruals 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ali, A., L. S. Hwang and M. A. Trombley, “Arbitrage Risk and the Book-to-Market Anomaly.” Journal of Financial Economics (2002) (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  2. Basu, S., “Investment Performance of Common Stocks in Relation to Their Price to Earnings Ratios: A Test of The Efficient Market Hypothesis.” The Journal of Finance 32, 663–682 (1977).Google Scholar
  3. Beaver, W., “The Information Content of Annual Earnings Announcements.” Journal of Accounting Research 6, 67–92 (1968).Google Scholar
  4. Brown, L. D. and M. S. Rozeff. “The Superiority of Analyst Forecasts as Measures of Expectations: Evidence from Earnings.” The Journal of Finance 33, 1–16 (1978).Google Scholar
  5. Brown, L. D., P. A. Griffin, R. L. Hagerman and M. E. Zmijewski. “Security Analyst Superiority Relative to Univariate Time Series Models in Forecasting Quarterly Earnings.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 9, 61–88 (1987).Google Scholar
  6. Chan, K., Y. Hamao and J. Lakonishok. “Fundamentals and Stock Returns in Japan.” The Journal of Finance 46, 1739–1764 (1991).Google Scholar
  7. Doukas, J. A., C. F. Kim and C. Pantzalis. “A Test of the Error-Expectations Explanation of the Value/Glamour Stock Returns Performance: Evidence from Analysts' Forecasts.” The Journal of Finance 57, 2143–2166 (2002).Google Scholar
  8. Fama, E. F. “Efficient Capital Markets: II.” The Journal of Finance 46, 1575–1617 (1991).Google Scholar
  9. Fama, E. F. and K. R. French, “The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns.” The Journal of Finance 47, 427–465 (1992).Google Scholar
  10. Griffin, J. and M. Lemmon. “Book-to-Market Equity, Distress Risk, and Stock Returns.” The Journal of Finance 57, 2317–2336 (2002).Google Scholar
  11. La Porta, R., J. Lakonishok, A. Shleifer and R. Vishny. “Good News for Value Stocks: Further Evidence on Market Efficiency.” The Journal of Finance 52, 859–874 (1997).Google Scholar
  12. Lakonishok, J., A. Shleifer and R. Vishny, “Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation, and Risk.” The Journal of Finance 49, 1541–1578 (1994).Google Scholar
  13. Mulford C. W. and E. E. Comiskey, The Financial Numbers Game: Detecting Creative Accounting Practices. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2002.Google Scholar
  14. The New York Times. Cheap Stocks: Undervalued? June 8 (1978).Google Scholar
  15. O'Brien P. C. “Analysts' Forecasts as Earnings Expectations.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 10, 53–83 (1988).Google Scholar
  16. Piotroski, J. D., “Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers.” Journal of Accounting Research 38, 1–41 (2000).Google Scholar
  17. Rosenberg, B., K. Reid and L. Ronald, “Persuasive Evidence of Market Inefficiency.” Journal of Portfolio Management 11, 9–17 (1985).Google Scholar
  18. Shumway, T., “The Delisting Return Bias in CRSP Data.” The Journal of Finance 52, 327–340 (1997).Google Scholar
  19. Sloan, R. G. “Do Stock Prices Fully Reflect Information in Accruals and Cash Flows About Future Earnings?” The Accounting Review 71, 289–316 (1996).Google Scholar
  20. Vassalou, M., “Default Risk in Equity Returns.” Working Paper. Columbia University (2001).Google Scholar
  21. The Wall Street Journal, Leading the News: AT&TCorp. Resorts To Unusual Motion: Reverse Stock Split-Market Capitalization Stays Constant, but Measure Would Boost Share Price. April 11 (2002).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eli Bartov
    • 1
  • Myungsun Kim
    • 2
  1. 1.Leonard N. Stern School of BusinessNew York UniversityNew YorkUSA.
  2. 2.Department of Accounting & Law, School of ManagementUniversity of Buffalo, SUNYBuffaloUSA.

Personalised recommendations