Selectivity, Quality Adjustment and Mean Reversion in the Measurement of House Values*

  • Min Hwang
  • John M. Quigley
Article

Abstract

This paper develops a model of price formation in the housing market which accounts for the non-random selection of those dwellings sold on the market from the stock of existing houses. The model we develop also accounts for changes in the quality of dwellings themselves and tests for mean reversion in individual house prices. The model is applied to a unique body of data representing all dwellings sold in Sweden's largest metropolitan area during the period 1982–1999. The analysis compares house price indices that account for selectivity, quality change and mean reversion with the conventional repeat sales models used to describe the course of metropolitan housing prices. We find that the repeat sales method yields systematically large biased estimates of the value of the housing stock. Our comparison suggests that the more general approach to the estimation of housing prices or housing wealth yields substantially improved estimates of the course of housing prices and housing wealth.

house price index selectivity mean reversion hybrid model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bailey, M. H., R. F. Muth, and H. O. Nourse. (1963). “A Regression Method for Real Estate Price Index Construction,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 4, 933–942.Google Scholar
  2. Case, B., H. O. Pollakowski, and S. M. Wachter. (1997). “Frequency of Transaction and House Price Modelling,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 14, 173–187.Google Scholar
  3. Case, B., and J. M. Quigley. (1991). “The Dynamics of Real Estate Prices,” Review of Economics and Statistics 73(1), 50–58.Google Scholar
  4. Case, K. E., J. M. Quigley, and R. J. Shiller. (2001). “Stock Market Wealth, Housing Market Wealth, Spending, and Consumption.” Paper prepared for the NBER Summer Institute, Cambridge, MA, July 2001.Google Scholar
  5. Case, K. E., and R. J. Shiller. (1987). “Prices of Single-Family Homes Since 1970: New Indexes for Four Cities,” New England Economic Review 45–56.Google Scholar
  6. Calhoun, C. A. (1996). OFHEO House Price Indexes: HPI Technical Description, Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, 1996.Google Scholar
  7. Clapp, J. M., and C. Giacotto. (1992). “Estimating Price Trends for Residential Property: A Comparison of Repeat Sales and Assessed Value Methods,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 5, 357–374.Google Scholar
  8. DiPasquale, D., and C. T. Somerville. (1995). “Do House Prices Based on Transactions Represent the Entire Housing Stock? Evidence from the National and Metropolitan HS, 1974–1991,” Journal of Housing Economics 4, 100–110.Google Scholar
  9. Englund, P., J. M. Quigley and C. Redfearn. (1998). “Improved Price Indexes for Real Estate: Measuring the Course of Swedish Housing Prices,” Journal of Urban Economics 44, 171–196.Google Scholar
  10. Englund, P., J. M. Quigley, and C. Redfearn. (1999). “The Choice of Methodology for Computing Housing Price Indices,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 19(2), 91–112.Google Scholar
  11. Gatzlaff, D. H., and D. R. Haurin. (1997). “Sample Selection and Repeat Sales Index Estimates,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 14(1–2), 33–50.Google Scholar
  12. Gatzlaff, D. H., and D. R. Haurin. (1998). “Sample Selection Biases in Local House Value Indices,” Journal of Urban Economics 43(2), 199–222.Google Scholar
  13. Goetzmann, W. N. (1993). “Accounting for Taste: Art and the Financial Markets over Three Centuries,” American Economic Review 83(5), 1370–1377.Google Scholar
  14. Goetzmann, W. N., and M. Spiegel. (1995). “Non-Temporal Components of Residential Real Estate Appreciation,” The Review of Economics and Statistics 77, 199–206.Google Scholar
  15. Griliches, Z. (1971). Price Indexes and Quality Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hausman, J. A. (1979). “Individual Discount Rates and the Purchase and Utilization of Energy Using Durables,” Bell Journal of Economics 1(1), 33–54.Google Scholar
  17. Heckman, J. (1979). “Sample Selectivity Bias as a Specification Error,” Econometrica 47(1), 153–161.Google Scholar
  18. Hwang, M., and J. M. Quigley. (2002). “Price Discovery in Time and Space: The course of Condominium Prices in Singapore,” Berkeley Program on Housing and Urban Policy, Working Paper W02-002.Google Scholar
  19. Jud, D. G., and T. G. Seaks. (1994). “Sample Selection Bias in Estimating Housing Sales Prices,” Journal of Real Estate Research 9(3), 289–298.Google Scholar
  20. Kain, J. F., and J. M. Quigley. (1970). “Measuring the Value of Housing Quality,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 65(44), 532–548.Google Scholar
  21. Kain, J. F., and J. M. Quigley. (1975). Housing Markets and Racial Discrimination. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Meese, R. A., and N. E. Wallace. (1997). “The Construction of Residential Housing Price Indices: A Comparison of Repeat-Sales, Hedonic-Regression, and Hybrid Approaches,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 14(1–2), 51–73.Google Scholar
  23. Otha, M., and Z. Giliches. (1975). “Automobile Prices Revisited: Extensions of the Hedonic Price Hypothesis,” In N. E. Terleckyj (ed.), Household Production and Consumption. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. Rosen, S. S. (1974). “Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets,” Journal of Political Economy 82(1), 34–55.Google Scholar
  25. Zellner, A. (1962). “An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests of Aggregation Bias,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 57, 500–509.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Min Hwang
    • 1
  • John M. Quigley
    • 2
  1. 1.National University of SingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.University of CaliforniaBerkeleyU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations