Advertisement

Review of Accounting Studies

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 35–58 | Cite as

Audit Firm Industry Specialization and Client Disclosure Quality

  • Kimberly A. Dunn
  • Brian W. Mayhew
Article

Abstract

This paper provides evidence that clients select auditors as part of their overall disclosure strategy. We hypothesize that in addition to higher quality audits, industry-specialist audit firms assist clients in enhancing disclosures. We also posit that the choice of an industry-specialist auditor signals a client’s intention to provide enhanced disclosures. However, we predict that industry-specialist audit firms are less important in regulated industries where enhanced disclosures add little value. Consistent with our hypotheses, we document a positive association between industry-specialist audit firms and analysts’ rankings of disclosure quality in unregulated industries, but no relation in regulated industries.

auditor industry specialization disclosure quality regulated industries 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balsam, S., J. Krishnan and J. G. S. Yang. (2003). “Auditor Industry Specialization and the Earnings Response Coefficient.” Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 22, 71–97.Google Scholar
  2. Behn, B. K., J. V. Carcello, D. R. Hermanson and R. H. Hermanson. (1997). “The Determinants of Audit Client Satisfaction Among Clients of Big 6 Firms.” Accounting Horizons 11, 7–24.Google Scholar
  3. Chan, D. K., A. Ferguson, D. A. Simunic and D. Stokes. (2001). “A Spatial Analysis and Test of Oligopolistic Competition in the Market for Assurance Services.” Working paper, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
  4. Coopers & Lybrand, LLP. (1998). “Anticipating Questions at Shareholders' Meetings 1998.” New York, NY: Coopers and Lybrand LLP.Google Scholar
  5. Craswell, A. T., J. R. Francis and S. L. Taylor. (1995). “Auditor Brand Name Reputations and Industry Specializations.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 20, 297–322.Google Scholar
  6. Danos, P. and J. Eichenseher. (1982). “Audit Industry Dynamics: Factors Affecting Changes in Client-Industry Market Shares.” Journal of Accounting Research 20, 604–616.Google Scholar
  7. DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). “Auditor Size and Audit Quality.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 3, 183–199.Google Scholar
  8. DeFond, M. L. (1992). “The Association Between Changes in Client Firm Agency Costs and Auditor Switching.” Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 11, 16–31.Google Scholar
  9. Eccles, R. G., R. H. Herz, E. M. Keegan and D. M. H. Phillips. (2001). The Value Reporting Revolution: Moving Beyond the Earnings Game. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  10. Fama, E. and J. D. MacBeth. (1973). “Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests.” Journal of Political Economy 81, 607–636.Google Scholar
  11. Goff, J. (2002). “Who Goes Up if Andersen Goes Down?” www.CFO.com. Google Scholar
  12. Gramling, A. A., V. E. Johnson and I. K. Khurana. (2000). “The Association Between Audit Firm Industry Experience and Financial Reporting Quality.” Working paper, Georgia State University.Google Scholar
  13. Hogan, C. E. and D. C. Jeter. (1999). “Industry Specialization by Auditors.” Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 18, 1–17.Google Scholar
  14. Krishnan, J. (2001). “Comparison of Auditor's Self-Reported Industry Expertise and Alternative Measures of Industry Specialization.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics 127–142.Google Scholar
  15. Kwon, S. Y. (1996). “The Impact of Competition within the Client's Industry on the Auditor Selection Decision.” Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 15, 53–70.Google Scholar
  16. Lang, M. and R. Lundholm. (1993). “Cross-Sectional Determinants of Analyst Ratings of Corporate Disclosures.” Journal of Accounting Research 31, 246–271.Google Scholar
  17. Lang, M. and R. Lundholm. (1996). “Corporate Disclosure Policy and Analyst Behavior.” The Accounting Review 71, 467–492.Google Scholar
  18. Lev, B. (2002). “Andersen Is Toast. But Its Progeny Can Still Flourish.” The Wall Street Journal Online, Manager's Journal.Google Scholar
  19. Mayhew, B. W. and M. Wilkins. (2003). “Audit Firm Industry Specialization as a Differentiation Strategy: Evidence from Fees Charged to Firms Going Public.” Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 22, 33–52.Google Scholar
  20. Nwaeze, E. T. (2000). “Positive and Negative Earnings Surprises, Regulatory Climate, and Stock Returns.” Contemporary Accounting Research 107–134.Google Scholar
  21. Palmrose, Z.-V. (1986). “Audit Fees and Auditor Size: Further Evidence.” Journal of Accounting Research 97–110.Google Scholar
  22. Pearson, T. and G. Trompeter. (1994). “Competition in the Market for Audit Services: The Effect of Supplier Concentration on Audit Fees.” Contemporary Accounting Research 11, 115–135.Google Scholar
  23. Sengupta, P. (1998). “Corporate Disclosure Quality and the Cost of Debt.” The Accounting Review 73, 459–474.Google Scholar
  24. Simunic, D. (1980). “The Pricing of Audit Services: Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Accounting Research 18, 161–190.Google Scholar
  25. Simunic, D. and M. Stein. (1990). “Audit Risk in the Client Portfolio Context.” Contemporary Accounting Research 6, 329–343.Google Scholar
  26. Verrecchia, R. E. (2001). “Essays on Disclosure.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 32, 97–180.Google Scholar
  27. Warfield, T. D., J. J. Wild and K. L. Wild. (1995). “Managerial Ownership, Accounting Choices, and Informativeness of Earnings.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 20, 61–91.Google Scholar
  28. Weiss, L. and M. Klass. (1986). Regulatory Reform: What Actually Happened. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of AccountancyFlorida Atlantic UniversityBoca Raton

Personalised recommendations