Radiophysics and Quantum Electronics

, Volume 47, Issue 3, pp 185–204 | Cite as

Study of the Excitation Conditions and Characteristics of Ionospheric Plasma Turbulence at the Development Stage of the Ponderomotive Parametric Instability

  • E. N. Sergeev
  • S. M. Grach
  • P. V. Kotov


We present the results of studying the development features of nonlinear effects at the initial stage of interaction of powerful HF radio waves with the plasma in the ionospheric F region. Experimental measurements were performed at the “Sura” heating facility for a wide pump frequency range (4.5–9.0 MHz) and a variety of pulse durations (0.3–100 ms) and effective radiated powers (1–30 MW) at various times of a day. The performed measurements allow us to study the excitation thresholds and time–amplitude characteristics of the ponderomotive self-action of a pump wave as well as the relaxation characteristics of the stimulated electromagnetic emission of the ionosphere as functions of the pump parameters and ionospheric conditions. The measured development features of the ponderomotive parametric instability in the ionospheric plasma are compared with the calculation results. The instability threshold fields (Eth≈ 220 mV/m) and the damping rates (γe≈ 450 s-1) of plasma waves, measured under evening-time conditions, are close to the estimates obtained on the assumption of collisional damping of Langmuir turbulence. A significant increase in the threshold field and the damping rate (by factors of up to 3 and 6, respectively) was observed under daytime conditions. In this case, the minimum values of these quantities (Eth≈ 350 mV/m and γe≈ 600 s-1) were observed for pump-wave reflection heights of about z≈ 230 km. The measurement and simulation results are indicative of the dominant effect of photoelectrons on the development features of ionospheric plasma turbulence under daytime conditions. We discuss the possibilities of using the developed method for comprehensive monitoring of the parameters of Langmuir turbulence and the background ionospheric plasma.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    A. V. Gaponov and M. A. Miller, Sov. Phys. JETP, 7, 168 (1958).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. V. Vas'kov and A. V. Gurevich, Radiophys. Quantum Electron., 16, No. 2, 138 (1973).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    N. A. Mityakov, V.O. Rapoport, and V.Yu. Trakhtengerts, Geomagn. Aeron., 14, No. 1, 29 (1974).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ya. I. Al'ber, Z.N. Krotova, N.A. Mityakov, et al., Sov. Phys. JETP, 39, 275 (1974).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    N. A. Mityakov, V.O. Rapoport, and V.Yu. Trakhtengerts, Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., Radiofiz, 18, No. 1, 27 (1975).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    F.W. Perkins, C.R. Oberman, and E. J. Valeo, J. Geophys. Res., 79, No. 10, 1478 (1974).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. A. Fejer, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., 17, No. 1, 135 (1979).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. A. Fejer and H. Kopka, J. Geophys. Res., 86, No. 7, 5746 (1981).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    L.M. Erukhimov, S.A. Metelev, N.A. Mityakov, and V. L. Frolov, Radiophys. Quantum Electron., 25, No. 5, 348 (1982).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    L. M. Erukhimov, V.Ya. Kovalev, E.P. Kurakin, et al., Geomagn. A'eron., 27, No. 5, 758 (1987).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    L. M. Erukhimov, V.Ya. Kovalev, E. P. Kurakin, et al., "Results of experimental studies of artificial ionospheric turbulence at the "Gissar" heating facility," Preprint No. 290 [in Russian], Radiophys. Res. Inst., Gorky (1989).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. N. Boiko, L. M. Erukhimov, V. A. Zyuzin, et al., Radiophys. Quantum Electron., 28, 259 (1985).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    G.N. Boiko and L.M. Erukhimov, Geomagn. A'eron., 30, No. 1, 68 (1990).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. Y. Wong and R. J. Taylor, Phys. Rev. Lett., 27, No. 10, 644 (1971).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J.A. Fejer, M. P. Sulzer, and F. T. Djuth, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 15985 (1991).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M.P. Sulzer and J.A. Fejer, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 15035 (1994).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    F. T. Djuth, C.A. Gonzales, and H.M. Ierkic, J. Geophys. Res., 91, No. A11, 12089 (1986).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    E. N. Sergeev, V. L. Frolov, G. N. Boiko, and G. P. Komrakov, Radiophys. Quantum Electron., 41, No. 3, 206 (1998).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    E.N. Sergeev, S.M. Grach, G. P. Komrakov, et al., Radiophys. Quantum Electron., 45, No. 3, 193 (2002).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    V. L. Frolov, E.N. Sergeev, G. P. Komrakov, et al., J. Geophys. Res., 86, No. 7, 5746 (2002).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    V. L. Ginzburg, The Propagation of Electromagnetic Waves in Plasmas, Pergamon Press, Oxford (1970).Google Scholar
  22. 22. Scholar
  23. 23.
    R. W. Shunk and A. F. Nagy, Ionospheres: Physics, Plasma Physics, and Chemistry. Atmospheric and Space Science Series, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (2000).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    M. N. Fatkullin, T. I. Zelenova, V.K. Kozlov, et al., Empirical Models of the Midlatitude Ionosphere [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1981).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    I. A. Krinberg, Kinetics of Electrons in the Earth's Ionosphere and Plasmasphere [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1978).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    A.A. Galeev, R. Z. Sagdeev, V.D. Shapiro, and V. I. Shevchenko, in: Interaction of Strong Electromagnetic Waves with Collisionless Plasmas [in Russian], Inst. Appl. Phys., Gorky (1980), p. 6.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    E. N. Pelinovsky, V. E. Fridman, and Yu.K. 'Engel'brekht, Nonlinear Evolution Equations [in Russian], Valgus, Tallinn (1984).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    N. A. Mityakov, S.M. Grach, and S. N. Mityakov, Itogi Nauki Tekh., Ser. Geomagn. Vysok. Sloi Atmos., 9(1989).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    V. V. Vas'kov and A. V. Gurevich, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 64, No. 4, 1272 (1973).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    V. V. Vas'kov and A. V. Gurevich, Sov. Phys. JETP, 39, 822 (1974).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    V.E. Zakharov, Sov. Phys. JETP, 35, 908 (1972).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    E. Mjølhus, E. Helmersen, and D.F. DuBois, Nonlinear Processes in Geophys., 10, 151 (2003).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    D.F. DuBois, D.A. Russel, P.Y. Cheing, and M. P. Sulzer, Phys. Plasmas, 8, No. 3, 791 (2001).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    V. L. Frolov, E.N. Ermakova, G. P. Komrakov, et al., Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, No. 16, 3103 (2001).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    S. M. Grach, Radiophys. Quantum Electron., 28, No. 6, 470 (1985).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. N. Sergeev
    • 1
  • S. M. Grach
    • 1
  • P. V. Kotov
    • 1
  1. 1.Radiophysical Research InstituteNizhny NovgorodRussia

Personalised recommendations