Advertisement

The Review of Austrian Economics

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 387–405 | Cite as

National Income Accounting and Public Policy

  • Randall G. Holcombe
Article

Abstract

Modern national income accounting was designed in the early 20th century for the purpose of providing improved indicators about the performance of the economy so that government policy makers could better control the economy. The way that performance is measured affects the types of policies used to try to accomplish policy goals. Two attributes of national income accounting are analyzed for their effects on economic policy. First, government production is included in the national income accounts at cost, rather than at market value as private sector output is measured. This biases policy toward a larger public sector. Second, output is measured as a homogeneous dollar amount. This biases policy toward focusing on increasing quantities of inputs and outputs in the production process, rather than on innovation and entrepreneurship, which are the true engines of economic progress. Economic policy could be improved by focusing less on national income as an indicator of policy, and more on the underlying processes that foster economic progress.

national income accounting macroeconomic policy public finance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alchon, G. (1985) The Invisible Hand of Planning: Capitalism, Social Science, and the State in the 1920s.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Armentano, D. T. (1972) The Myths of Antitrust: Economic Theory and Legal Cases.New Rochelle, NY: Arlington House.Google Scholar
  3. Armentano, D. T. (1982) Antitrust and Monopoly: Anatomy of a Policy Failure.New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Armentano, D. T. (1986) Antitrust Policy: The Case for Repeal.Washington, D. C.: Cato Institute.Google Scholar
  5. Cox, W. M. and Alm, R. (1998) The Right Stuff: America's Move to Mass Customization.Annual Report, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.Google Scholar
  6. Cox, W. M. and Alm, R. (1999) Myths of Rich and Poor: Why We're Better Off Than We Think.New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  7. Davis, J. R. (1971) The New Economics and the Old Economists.Ames: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Forte, F. and Buchanan, J. M. (1961) “The Evaluation of Public Services.” Journal of Political Economy, 69: 107–121.Google Scholar
  9. Gwartney, J., Holcombe, R., and Lawson, R. (1998) “The Scope of Government and the Wealth of Nations.” Cato Journal, 18: 163–190.Google Scholar
  10. Gwartney, J. D., Lawson, R. A., and Holcombe, R. G. (1999) “Economic Freedom and the Environment for Economic Growth.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 155: 643–663.Google Scholar
  11. Hayek, F. A. (1945) “The Use of Knowledge in Society.” American Economic Review, 35: 519–530.Google Scholar
  12. Higgs, R. (1987) Crisis and Leviathan: Critical Episodes in the Growth of American Government.New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Higgs, R. (1992) “Wartime Prosperity? A Reassessment of the U.S. Economy in the 1940s.” Journal of Economic History, 52: 41–60.Google Scholar
  14. Higgs, R. (1999) “From Central Planning to the Market: The American Transition, 1945-1947.” Journal of Economic History, 59(3): 600–623.Google Scholar
  15. Holcombe, R. G. (1995) Public Policy and the Quality of Life.Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  16. Holcombe, R. G. (1998) “Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 1: 45–62.Google Scholar
  17. Holcombe, R. G. (1999) “Equilibrium Versus the Invisible Hand.” Review of Austrian Economics, 12: 227–243.Google Scholar
  18. Keynes, J. M. (1936) The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money.New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.Google Scholar
  19. Kirzner, I. M. (1973) Competition and Entrepreneurship.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kuznets, S. (1945) National Product in Wartime.New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  21. Landes, D. S. (1998) The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some Are So Rich and Some So Poor.New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  22. Mitchell, W. C. (1913) Business Cycles.Berkeley: University of California Press, 1913.Google Scholar
  23. Moore, S. and Simon, J. L. (1999) “The Greatest Century That Ever Was: 25 Miraculous Trends of the Past 100 Years.” Cato Institute Policy Analysis no. 364.Google Scholar
  24. Palmer, E. Z. (1966) The Meaning and Measurement of the National Income.Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  25. Peltzman, S. (1974) Regulation of Pharmaceutical Innovation.Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
  26. Ricardo, D. (1912 [1817]) The Principles of Political Economy & Taxation.New York: E.P. Dutton.Google Scholar
  27. Rothbard, M. N. (1970) Power and Market: Government and the Economy.Menlo Park, CA: Institute for Humane Studies.Google Scholar
  28. Samuelson, P. A. (1973) Economics, 9th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  29. Skousen, M. (1990) The Structure of Production.New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Skowronek, S. (1982) Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877-1920.New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Smith, A. (1937 [1776]) An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations.New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
  32. Starr, P. (1982) The Social Transformation of American Medicine.New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  33. Studenski, P. (1958) The Income of Nations-Theory, Measurement, and Analysis: Past and Present.New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Randall G. Holcombe
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsFlorida State UniversityTallahassee

Personalised recommendations