Quality of Life Research

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 321–330

Social support and health-related quality of life in hip and knee osteoarthritis

  • O. Ethgen
  • P. Vanparijs
  • S. Delhalle
  • S. Rosant
  • O. Bruyère
  • J.-Y. Reginster
Article

Abstract

Objective: To document the association between social support and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: A prospective survey including the SF-36 and the Social Support questionnaire (SSQ) was administered to 108 hip and knee OA patients attending an outpatient physical rehabilitation and rheumatology clinic. Multiple regression analysis were performed to study the relation between social support and each dimension of the SF-36, controlling for age, sex, body mass index, number of comorbid conditions, socioeconomic status, site of survey completion and severity of OA which was gauged with the pain dimension of the WOMAC, an OA-specific health status instrument. Results: Greater social companionship transactions were associated with higher physical functioning (standardized regression coefficients: β = 0.26, p < 0.01), general health (β = 0.32, p < 0.001), mental health (β = 0.25, p < 0.01), social functioning (β = 0.20, p < 0.05) and vitality (β = 0.25, p < 0.05). Satisfaction with problem-oriented emotional support was related to better physical functioning (β = 0.22, p < 0.01), mental health (β = 0.38, p < 0.001), role-emotional (B = 0.23, p < 0.01), social functioning (β = 0.19, p < 0.05) and vitality (β = 0.26, p < 0.01). Conclusion: Social support components significantly account for HRQoL. Health interventions in OA, primary dedicated to pain and physical disability, could be supplemented with social support component to enhance health outcomes.

Health-related quality of life Osteoarthritis Social support 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Internal Med 1993; 118: 622-629.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sarason IG, Levine HM, Basham RB, Sarason BR. Assessing social support: The social support questionnaire. J Pers Soc Psychol 1983; 44: 127-139.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schaefer C, Coyne JC, Lazarus RS. The health-related functions of social support. J Behav Med 1981; 4: 381-406.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kelsey JL, Hochberg MC. Epidemiology of chronic musculoskeletal disorders. Ann Rev Public Health 1988; 9: 379-401.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Arthritis prevalence and activity limitations, United States 1990. Morb Mort Wkly Rep 1994; 43: 433-438.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Abyad A, Boyer JT. Arthritis and aging. Curr Opinion Rheum 1992; 4: 153-159.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Felson DT, Zhang Y. An update on the epidemiology of knee and hip osteoarthritis with a view to prevention. Arthritis Rheum 1998; 41: 1343-1355.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Callahan LF, Rao J, Boutaugh M. Arthritis and woman's health: Prevalence, impact and prevention. Am J Prev Med 1996; 12: 401-409.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hughes SL, Dunlop D. The prevalence and impact of arthritis in older persons. Arthritis Care Res 1995; 8: 257-264.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lawrence RC, Helmick CG, Arnett Fc, et al. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and selected musculoskeletal disorders in the United States. Arthritis Rheum 1998; 41: 778-799.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Badley EM, Wang PP. Arthritis and the aging population: Projections of arthritis prevalence in Canada 1991 to 2031. J Rheumatol 1998; 25: 138-144.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yelin E, Lubeck D, Holman H, Epstein W. The impact of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis: The activities of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis compared to controls. J Rheumatol 1987; 14: 710-717.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    De Bock GH, Kaptein AA, Touw-Otten F, Mulder JD. Health-related quality of life in patients with osteoarthritis in a family practice setting. Arthritis Care Res 1995; 8: 88-93.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dexter P, Brandt K. Distribution and predictors of depressive symptoms in osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 1994; 21: 279-286.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D, et al. Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum 1986; 29: 1039-1049.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Altman R, Alarcon GC, Appelrouth D, et al. The American College of Rheumatology Criteria for the classification and reporting of Osteoarthritis of the hip. Arthritis Rheum 1991; 34: 505-514.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ware JE Jr, Krinstin KS, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 health survey. Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston: New England Medical Center, The Health Institute; 1993.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ware JE. The SF-36 health survey. In: Spilker B, (ed), Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials, 2nd edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1996: 337-345.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Lu JF, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 1994; 32: 40-66.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tuttleman M, Pillemer SR, Tilley BC, et al. A cross sectional assessment of health status instruments in patients with rheumatoid arthritis participating in a clinical trial. Minocycline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Trial Group. J Rheumatol 1997; 24: 1910-1915.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ruta DA, Hurst NP, Kind P, Hunter M, Stubbings A. Measuring health status in British patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the short form 36-item health survey (SF-36). Br J Rheumatol 1998; 37: 425-436.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kosinski M, Keller SD, Hatoum HT, Kong SX, Ware JE Jr. The SF-36 health survey as a generic outcome measure in clinical trials of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions and score reliability. Med Care 1999; 37: MS10-22.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kosinski M, Keller SD, Ware JE Jr, Hatoum HT, Kong SX. The SF-36 health survey as a generic outcome measure in clinical trials of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Relative validity of scales in relation to clinical measures of arthritis severity. Med Care 1999; 37: MS23-39.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bellamy N. WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index. A User's Guide. University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada 1995.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: A health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988; 15: 1833-1840.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: A health status instrument for measuring clinically-important patient-relevant outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. J Orth Rheum 1988; 1: 95-108.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bellamy N, Kean WF, Buchanan WW, Gerecz-Simon E, Campbell J. Double blind randomized controlled trial of sodium Meclofenamate (Meclomen) and Diclofenac Sodium (Voltaren): Post-validation reapplication of the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index. J Rheumatol 1992; 19: 153-159.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Suurmeijer TPBM, Doeglas DM, Briançon S, et al. The measurement of social support in the ‘European Research on Incapacitating Diseases and Social Support’: The development of the social support questionnaire for transactions (SSQT). Soc Sci Med 1995; 40: 1221-1229.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Doeglas DM, Suurmeijer TPBM, Briançon S, et al. An international study on measuring social support: Interactions and satisfaction. Soc Sci Med 1996; 43: 1389-1397.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hirsch RP, Riegelman R. Statistical Operations. Analysis of Health Research Data. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Science; 1996.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Achat H, Kawachi I, Levine S, Berkey C, Coakley E, Colditz G. Social networks, stress and health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res 1998; 7: 735-750.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Caron J, Tempier R, Mercier C, Leouffe P. Components of social support and quality of life in severely mentally ill, low income individuals and a general population group. Community Mental Health J 1998; 34: 459-475.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pinquart M, Sorensen S. Influences of socioeconomic status, social network, and competence on subjective well-being in later life: A meta-analysis. Psychology Aging 2000; 15: 187-224.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Michael YL, Colditz GA, Coakley E, Kawachi I. Healthy behaviors, social networks, and healthy aging: Cross-sectional evidence from the Nurses' Health Study. Qual Life Res 1999; 8: 711-722.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sherbourne CD, Meredith LS, Rogers W, Ware JE. Social support and stressful life events: Age differences in their effects on health-related quality of life among the chronically ill. Qual Life Res 1992; 1: 235-246.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bosworth HB, Siegler IC, Olsen MK, et al. Social support and quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease. Qual Life Res 2000; 9: 829-839.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Swindells S, Mohr J, Justis JC, et al. Quality of life in patients with human immunodefficiency virus infection: Impact of social support, coping style and hopelessness. International J STD AIDS 1999; 10: 383-391.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Courtens AM, Stevens FC, Crebolder HF, Philipsen H. Longitudinal study on quality of life and social support in cancer patients. Cancer Nursing 1996; 19: 162-169.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cronan TA, Groessl E, Kaplan M. The effects of social support and education interventions on health care costs. Arthritis Care Res 1997; 10: 99-110.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Calfas KJ, Kaplan RM, Ingram RE. One-year evaluation of cognitive-behavioral intervention in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res 1992; 54: 202-209.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Blixen CE, Kippes C. Depression, social support, and quality of life in older adults with osteoarthritis. Image — J Nurs Scholarship 1999; 31: 221-226.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kiebzak GM, Campbell M, Mauerhan DR. The SF-36 general health status survey documents the burden of osteoarthritis and the benefits of total joint arthroplasty: But why should we use it? Am J Manag Care 2002; 8: 463-474.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. Ethgen
    • 1
    • 2
  • P. Vanparijs
    • 2
  • S. Delhalle
    • 2
  • S. Rosant
    • 2
  • O. Bruyère
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • J.-Y. Reginster
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.WHO Collaborating Center for Public Health Aspects of Osteoarticular Disorders, University of Liège, CHU Sart TilmanLiègeBelgium
  2. 2.Department of Epidemiology and Public HealthUniversity of Liège, CHU Sart TilmanLiègeBelgium
  3. 3.Bone and Cartilage Research UnitUniversity of Liège, CHU Centre VilleLiègeBelgium

Personalised recommendations